Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
Frances Nation (lead), James Broadbridge
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Frances Nation, James Broadbridge
- Postcode verified
ME15 9PS
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The senior leadership team, who had recently joined the school at the time of the last inspection, remains the same. p.2
- A new early years leader joined the school in September 2020. p.2
- The chief executive officer (CEO) of the trust resigned in December 2020. p.2
- Currently, there is an acting CEO in post. p.2
- Approximately 65% of pupils were educated at home when the school was closed to most pupils earlier this term. p.2
- Nearly all vulnerable pupils and 65% of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) were attending school. p.2
- At the time of this inspection, most pupils were attending school. p.2
- A small number of staff who were shielding were working from home. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance18
“Leaders have improved the provision for pupils with SEND.” p.3SEND & inclusion3
“Leaders have improved the provision for pupils with SEND.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,042
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Nicola Clarke Principal The Holy Family Catholic Primary School Bicknor Road Park Wood Maidstone ME15 9PS
p.1
Primary School
Following my remote inspection with Frances Nation, Her Majesty’s Inspector, of your school on Wednesday 24 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.
p.1
Primary School
This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted's published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.
p.1
Primary School
This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.
p.1
Primary School
The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in September 2019.
p.1
Primary School
Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
complete the work to sequence the knowledge and skills that pupils need in each subject
p.2
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
ensure that the school’s approach to teaching the curriculum is consistent across every class so that all pupils learn well
p.2
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
support pupils who are currently behind on the school’s phonics programme to catch up quickly.
p.2
Context
The senior leadership team, who had recently joined the school at the time of the last inspection, remains the same. A new early years leader joined the school in September 2020. The chief executive officer (CEO) of the trust resigned in December 2020. Currently, there is an acting CEO in post.
p.2
Context
Approximately 65% of pupils were educated at home when the school was closed to most pupils earlier this term. Nearly all vulnerable pupils and 65% of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) were attending school.
p.2
Context
At the time of this inspection, most pupils were attending school. A small number of staff who were shielding were working from home.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have been unwavering in making sure that pupils continue to get their education during the pandemic. They always have in mind ‘The Parable of the Lost Sheep’ as they try to live out their gospel values by reaching out to pupils and families in particular need of support. Impressively, nearly all vulnerable pupils were in school during the most recent partial closure.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders were determined that, as far as possible, pupils would get direct teaching whether they were learning in school or at home. Teachers provided daily live lessons following the usual curriculum to pupils learning remotely. In addition, staff provided online tuition to support pupils who needed to revisit what they had been taught.
p.2
Main findings
COVID-19 has hampered leaders’ work to develop the curriculum as fully as they wanted by now. Drawing on relevant research, leaders are working through each subject to carefully consider the order that knowledge and skills should be taught in. They have not yet tackled all subjects. There is more to do to make sure that all staff are teaching new plans as intended so that pupils across the school know more and remember more. The trust’s commitment to making reading the number one priority is evident. They have invested much in staff’s professional development so that they can teach reading more effectively. Throughout lockdown, leaders provided pupils at home with online access to reading books, including all books on the phonics programme.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders are not able to fully implement the phonics programme as intended due to ‘bubble’ restrictions. They are making suitable adjustments in the current circumstances. Now that all pupils are back in school, staff have checked what pupils remember from the phonics programme. They have found that many pupils are behind where they should be. Nonetheless, leaders are providing the right support to help pupils catch up.
p.3
Main findings
In mathematics, leaders’ checks have enabled them to prioritise the areas that pupils need to be taught again to secure their understanding. This includes regular practice of calculation methods and fluency in number. In other subjects, such as design and technology and science, teachers are providing pupils with more time to develop the practical skills they could not easily learn at home.
p.3
Main findings
Leaders have improved the provision for pupils with SEND. Staff are now better trained and, as a result, are meeting pupils’ needs in the classroom so they can learn alongside their classmates. Leaders ensured that outside agencies continued to provide pupils with SEND with the help they needed while the school was partially closed.
p.3
Main findings
The trust really knows the school and the journey it is on. Governors know what the school’s priorities are. They receive the right information from leaders. This means they challenge leaders and hold them to account for the actions they are taking to improve the school. The trust assured themselves about the quality of education provided while the school was closed to most pupils.
p.3
Main findings
There are clear lines of accountability within the trust. The trust’s primary improvement team knows what leaders need to do to improve the teaching of the curriculum. To address this, they are working alongside teachers to help improve their expertise and ensure that pupils are knowing more and remembering more of the taught curriculum.
p.3
Evidence
This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, the executive principal, senior leaders, the chair of trustees, the chair of the local governing body, staff, pupils and the senior primary improvement adviser from the trust, to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 24 free-text responses, and 27 staff questionnaires.
p.3
Evidence
I am copying this letter to the chair of trustees of the Kent Catholic Schools’ Partnership trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Kent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion