Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Louise Walker (lead), Yasmin Maskatiya

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Louise Walker, Yasmin Maskatiya

  • Postcode verified

    RG41 5NE

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−3Mixedmore positive than 23% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedwell supportedclear
Criticismdeclinedlimitedgapsnot improved

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings970w−3
  • What needs to improve115w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,070
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Shirley Austin Headteacher The Forest School Robin Hood Lane Winnersh Wokingham RG41 5NE

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Forest School

Following my remote inspection with Louise Walker, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 30 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Forest School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Forest School

This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Forest School

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in May 2018.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Forest School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 improve the progress of the weakest readers and develop all pupils’ vocabulary range.

p.2

Context

 Since the last inspection a new deputy headteacher and assistant headteacher have been appointed.

p.2

Context

 Approximately 95% of pupils were educated at home during the period of partial closure in the spring term. Just under half of all pupils with education, health and care plans were attending on site. The majority of vulnerable pupils were educated remotely.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, almost all pupils were attending on site.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have been proactive in developing curriculum content over the past two years. This process has continued unabated during the partial closures of schools. The headteacher has been assiduous in the drive to improve the quality of education. She and the governors have appointed new middle leaders across the curriculum. They have also made a range of new appointments to the subject teams.

p.2

Main findings

 Each department now has a clear rationale for what they teach. It is firmly based on the values and vision of the school. Staff are enthusiastically implementing the improved curriculum. They are very much focused on ensuring pupils remember what they learn. In addition, teachers have organised the sequence of what they teach, to allow for common topics to be taught at the same time across subjects. For instance, history covers World War 1 while pupils learn about the poetry of the period. This helps pupils to make richer connections in their learning.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have also reduced key stage 3 to two years and extended key stage 4 to three years. Leaders believe this means they are offering a broad and balanced curriculum. However, a few subjects currently receive only one session a fortnight at key stage 3. Leaders are aware of this. They plan to check carefully the coverage of curriculum content as the year progresses.

p.2

Main findings

 Senior leaders made sure that all pupils had access to the remote learning offer. They provided pupils with devices and internet access where required. Teachers offered the usual curriculum through live lessons. Pupils were very pleased with the rapid feedback that they received about their work while learning remotely. They say they have been able to keep up with their studies well.  There has been a high level of pupils’ engagement with their learning during this period. Now that pupils have returned to school, teachers have prioritised postponed practical work. If any pupil has to learn from home again, systems are in place for them to access the curriculum remotely.

p.2

Main findings

 Y11 and Y13 are pleased to be back at school and teachers report that they are working hard. Staff have largely been able to continue with the usual curriculum. This is because the vast majority engaged well with remote learning and retained well what they have learned over the past few months. Teachers continue to check for any gaps, ready to adapt what they are teaching if the need arises.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders have checked on all pupils’ reading ability through the course of the year. They are aware that this has declined somewhat. Leaders have introduced several strategies, but more is needed. Pupils need to improve the range of their vocabulary across all subjects.

p.3

Main findings

 Vulnerable pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities have been well supported throughout the partial closure. They have been as engaged as other pupils and have made progress in their learning. Some, indeed, with the benefit of additional adult support, have made even better than expected progress in some areas. However, the weakest readers have not significantly improved their fluency and understanding. These pupils need extra support to help them quickly become better readers.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors are well informed about the school. They know what advances the school has made over the past few years. They also know what challenges remain. Governors have established the values and vision of the school. This forms the basis for the school’s long-term strategy. Through their assurance processes they check on what progress the school is making. They have prioritised building the capacity of leadership in the school. They have also concentrated on strengthening the school’s financial position.

p.3

Main findings

 The headteacher and governors have sought out external support. The school is an active participant in the local secondary schools’ federation. This partnership has provided helpful professional development for their middle leaders. The local authority has also provided useful information briefings for senior leaders, as well as school improvement advice to the school.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, pupils, staff, representatives of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown. We also considered documentation provided by the school. We looked at 144 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 109 free-text responses, and 66 replies to the staff questionnaire.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Wokingham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion