Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
Louise Walker (lead), Yasmin Maskatiya
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Louise Walker, Yasmin Maskatiya
- Postcode verified
RG41 5NE
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Since the last inspection a new deputy headteacher and assistant headteacher have been appointed. p.2
- Approximately 95% of pupils were educated at home during the period of partial closure in the spring term. p.2
- Just under half of all pupils with education, health and care plans were attending on site. p.2
- The majority of vulnerable pupils were educated remotely. p.2
- At the time of this inspection, almost all pupils were attending on site. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance16
“Governors are well informed about the school.” p.3Communication & language2
“improve the progress of the weakest readers and develop all pupils’ vocabulary range.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,070
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Shirley Austin Headteacher The Forest School Robin Hood Lane Winnersh Wokingham RG41 5NE
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Forest School
Following my remote inspection with Louise Walker, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 30 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Forest School
This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Forest School
This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Forest School
The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in May 2018.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Forest School
Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
improve the progress of the weakest readers and develop all pupils’ vocabulary range.
p.2
Context
Since the last inspection a new deputy headteacher and assistant headteacher have been appointed.
p.2
Context
Approximately 95% of pupils were educated at home during the period of partial closure in the spring term. Just under half of all pupils with education, health and care plans were attending on site. The majority of vulnerable pupils were educated remotely.
p.2
Context
At the time of this inspection, almost all pupils were attending on site.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have been proactive in developing curriculum content over the past two years. This process has continued unabated during the partial closures of schools. The headteacher has been assiduous in the drive to improve the quality of education. She and the governors have appointed new middle leaders across the curriculum. They have also made a range of new appointments to the subject teams.
p.2
Main findings
Each department now has a clear rationale for what they teach. It is firmly based on the values and vision of the school. Staff are enthusiastically implementing the improved curriculum. They are very much focused on ensuring pupils remember what they learn. In addition, teachers have organised the sequence of what they teach, to allow for common topics to be taught at the same time across subjects. For instance, history covers World War 1 while pupils learn about the poetry of the period. This helps pupils to make richer connections in their learning.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have also reduced key stage 3 to two years and extended key stage 4 to three years. Leaders believe this means they are offering a broad and balanced curriculum. However, a few subjects currently receive only one session a fortnight at key stage 3. Leaders are aware of this. They plan to check carefully the coverage of curriculum content as the year progresses.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders made sure that all pupils had access to the remote learning offer. They provided pupils with devices and internet access where required. Teachers offered the usual curriculum through live lessons. Pupils were very pleased with the rapid feedback that they received about their work while learning remotely. They say they have been able to keep up with their studies well. There has been a high level of pupils’ engagement with their learning during this period. Now that pupils have returned to school, teachers have prioritised postponed practical work. If any pupil has to learn from home again, systems are in place for them to access the curriculum remotely.
p.2
Main findings
Y11 and Y13 are pleased to be back at school and teachers report that they are working hard. Staff have largely been able to continue with the usual curriculum. This is because the vast majority engaged well with remote learning and retained well what they have learned over the past few months. Teachers continue to check for any gaps, ready to adapt what they are teaching if the need arises.
p.3
Main findings
Leaders have checked on all pupils’ reading ability through the course of the year. They are aware that this has declined somewhat. Leaders have introduced several strategies, but more is needed. Pupils need to improve the range of their vocabulary across all subjects.
p.3
Main findings
Vulnerable pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities have been well supported throughout the partial closure. They have been as engaged as other pupils and have made progress in their learning. Some, indeed, with the benefit of additional adult support, have made even better than expected progress in some areas. However, the weakest readers have not significantly improved their fluency and understanding. These pupils need extra support to help them quickly become better readers.
p.3
Main findings
Governors are well informed about the school. They know what advances the school has made over the past few years. They also know what challenges remain. Governors have established the values and vision of the school. This forms the basis for the school’s long-term strategy. Through their assurance processes they check on what progress the school is making. They have prioritised building the capacity of leadership in the school. They have also concentrated on strengthening the school’s financial position.
p.3
Main findings
The headteacher and governors have sought out external support. The school is an active participant in the local secondary schools’ federation. This partnership has provided helpful professional development for their middle leaders. The local authority has also provided useful information briefings for senior leaders, as well as school improvement advice to the school.
p.3
Evidence
This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, pupils, staff, representatives of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown. We also considered documentation provided by the school. We looked at 144 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 109 free-text responses, and 66 replies to the staff questionnaire.
p.3
Evidence
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Wokingham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion