Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Charlie Fordham (lead), John Mitcheson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Charlie Fordham, John Mitcheson

  • Postcode verified

    LE18 4TA

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−23Mixedmore positive than 13% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyconsistentlysafeclear
Criticisminconsistencieslimitedconcernsmissednot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings961w−46
  • What needs to improve221w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,166
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 18%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Susan Webb Principal South Wigston High School St Thomas Road Wigston Leicester LE18 4TA

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of South Wigston High School

Following my remote inspection with Charlie Fordham, Her Majesty’s Inspector, of your school on 23 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of South Wigston High School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted's published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of South Wigston High School

This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of South Wigston High School

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in May 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of South Wigston High School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to ensure that:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 staff consistently apply the school’s agreed procedures to manage pupils’ behaviour

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 the information gained from teachers’ assessments is used effectively to identify what pupils have remembered, and what else they need to learn in the future.

p.2

Context

 In January 2021, the school joined the Learning Without Limits Academy Trust. A senior leader has been seconded from the trust to improve the curriculum and raise achievement. Two new middle leaders and three newly qualified teachers have joined the school. A new vice-chair of the governing body has been appointed.

p.2

Context

 At the start of the spring term, when the school was not open to all pupils, 89% of pupils were educated at home. Eleven percent of pupils attended on site. Approximately half of these pupils were known to be vulnerable or were pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). This included eight of the school’s 17 pupils who have an education, health and care plan.

p.2

Context

 At the time of the inspection, 90% of pupils were attending on site. A group of 24 pupils in Year 9 had been asked to isolate at home and were learning remotely.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have taken suitable actions to develop the curriculum. Improvements made after the previous inspection slowed at the start of the pandemic. Time has been used effectively to gauge what learning pupils have missed and what needed to be taught again. An adapted curriculum was implemented at the start of the 2020 autumn term.

p.2

Main findings

 Your monitoring shows that learning provided during lockdown worked well. Pupils in Years 7 and 11 told us that they have continued to learn and feel they are making progress. You acknowledge that during this period, practical learning in science, dance, music, art and physical education (PE) was limited.

p.2

Main findings

 The vast majority of pupils returned to school this term. Pupils are currently taught in separate ‘zones’ to minimise movement around school. Few changes have been made to the curriculum. Pupils continue to study their usual subjects. More time has been allocated to teaching core subjects to help pupils in Year 11 to catch up. This has marginalised core PE, which is not currently taught.  When pupils returned to school this term, you prioritised welcoming them back into their new surroundings and keeping everyone safe. Staff have begun to make assessments in lessons to build on the information gained during lockdown about how well pupils are progressing. Further assessments are planned for next term. You feel these will provide a clear overview of what pupils have remembered, and what learning may need re-visiting. Staff are expected to adapt the curriculum to ensure that pupils gain the knowledge they need.

p.2

Main findings

 Staff use a range of strategies to encourage pupils to read. They use different texts, social media and poetry to foster pupils’ interest and encourage them to read widely. Pupils with SEND receive support to develop their reading. Support for less able readers, other than those with SEND, is underdeveloped. There is no clear approach to teaching pupils to read by using phonics. Older pupils are taught the vocabulary but are not helped to interpret meaning and understand opinions in newspaper articles.

p.3

Main findings

 Currently, a small proportion of Year 9 pupils are taught remotely. Consequently, staff are preparing online resources as well as teaching in classrooms. They continue to provide a blend of live lessons in core subjects and a range of tasks for pupils to complete in their own time. You have checked that all pupils have suitable devices to learn at home.

p.3

Main findings

 Staff responsible for pupils with SEND ensured that pupils and their families were supported during the previous lockdown. Staff remained in weekly contact with pupils to make sure they had the resources needed to engage in remote learning. Regular checks have continued as pupils have returned to school. Staff have re-assessed pupils’ additional needs, including those pupils who joined in Year 7. Each year group has a learning support assistant allocated to support their learning.

p.3

Main findings

 Survey responses revealed that some staff have concerns about pupils’ behaviour. You are aware of inconsistencies in how staff apply the school’s agreed procedures to manage pupils’ behaviour and acknowledge the need to eradicate these inconsistencies. The trust feels it is now in a good position to support you with this action.

p.3

Main findings

 Joining the trust this year has bolstered governance. The governing body and trust board share a common vision for the school and are working together to oversee improvements. Regular meetings enable those responsible for governance to hold you and other leaders to account. They have asked challenging questions about the decisions made during the COVID-19 period.

p.3

Main findings

 New partnerships have enabled you to gain from the good practice in other schools within the academy trust, and local teaching schools. The trust is providing challenge and support through joint monitoring arrangements and greater scrutiny of the school’s improvement plans.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you and senior and middle leaders, the chief executive officer of the academy trust, a group of staff, two groups of pupils and four members of the governing body to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.4

Evidence

We also met with the designated safeguarding lead to discuss the school’s safeguarding arrangements. We looked at 14 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and 60 responses to the staff questionnaire.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chief executive officer of the Learning Without Limits Academy Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Leicestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion