Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 May 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Roary Pownall (lead), Caroline Poole

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Caroline Poole, Roary Pownall

  • Postcode verified

    NG15 8BZ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+30Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongfall behindsafe
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings849w+30
  • What needs to improve161w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
995
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Russell Tew Headteacher Leen Mills Primary School Leen Mills Lane Vaughan Estate Hucknall Nottingham Nottinghamshire NG15 8BZ

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Leen Mills Primary School

Following my remote inspection with Roary Pownall, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 30 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Leen Mills Primary School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Leen Mills Primary School

This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Leen Mills Primary School

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in June 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Leen Mills Primary School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 develop the effectiveness of subject leaders so they are able to check that pupils are learning the subject-specific vocabulary they need, and make sure that pupils are remembering sufficient knowledge in all year groups.

p.2

Context

 Since the previous inspection three new teachers have been appointed. Two are temporary appointments, covering for teachers who are currently on leave.

p.2

Context

 The governing body has appointed a new chair of governors and two further governors.

p.2

Context

 During the early spring term before the school reopened to all pupils, approximately one third of pupils were educated on site. Almost all vulnerable pupils and a little under one half of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) were taught in school.

p.2

Context

 Currently, all pupils have returned to school and are being taught on site.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have made sure that pupils carried on learning during lockdown. Pupils in school and at home followed the same curriculum. A small number of changes were made to the usual curriculum in science and design technology. This was because not all pupils had the resources that they needed at home to complete the work. When pupils did not join in with online lessons, leaders checked the reason for this. They made sure that any problems were sorted out.

p.2

Main findings

 Prior to the pandemic, leaders had reviewed the school’s curriculum. They have set out what they want pupils to know and remember in each subject, starting from the early years. Leaders have ensured that this work has continued during the past year. Leaders know that this work is not complete. Checks on what pupils can remember or the important words that pupils need to know are not taking place in all subjects.

p.2

Main findings

 During the partial school closure, pupils uploaded their work to the school’s online learning platform. Teachers checked regularly what pupils understood. They made sure that pupils got extra help if they needed it so that they did not fall behind. Pupils told inspectors that their teachers would always help them if they found the online work difficult to understand. However, a few pupils have not understood everything that was taught during this time. Leaders have further plans to ensure that pupils who have fallen behind during lockdown catch up.  Daily phonics lessons continued during lockdown. Teachers assessed the progress that pupils made in phonics. If a pupil did not remember the sounds that had been taught, they were identified quickly. Staff provided one-to-one sessions or intervention groups for these pupils. During lockdown, pupils had access to online books. Teachers continued to read every day to their classes.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils feel that story time is a special time in school.

p.3

Main findings

 Additional support is provided for pupils with SEND. The special educational needs coordinator checks that they get the help that they need. This ensures that the work provided for pupils with SEND helps them to build on what they already know. Support for pupils with emotional difficulties has also continued during lockdown. Key staff provided individual online meetings, to talk to pupils about how they are feeling. Parents praised the help that the staff offer. Every parent who responded to the Ofsted online questionnaire said that the school gives pupils with SEND the support they need to succeed.

p.3

Main findings

 Governing body meetings have continued through lockdown to check the work of the school. Governors question leaders to assure themselves that pupils are safe and have continued to be educated during this past year. They understand how the school’s curriculum has been developed. Governors take a strong interest in staff workload and well-being. A governor has been given responsibility to oversee this aspect of the school’s work.

p.3

Main findings

 The local authority has provided the school with a range of support and guidance. This has helped the school to improve early years provision and develop the role of subject leaders.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you and the deputy headteacher, five curriculum leaders, a small group of pupils, the leader responsible for pupils with SEND, two nurture leaders, the chair of the governing body and two further governors, and a representative of the local authority to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We also listened to pupils in Years 1, 2 and 3 read. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, including 81 free-text responses, and 27 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Nottinghamshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion