Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
Mark Howes (lead), Martin Pye
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Mark Howes, Martin Pye
- Postcode verified
B34 6NB
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school’s leadership and staff remain unchanged since the previous inspection. p.2
- Between the start of the spring term and 5 March 2021, all pupils received remote education at some point. p.2
- Typically, the proportion ranged between 80% and 90%. p.2
- This included the very few pupils who have an education, health and care plan. p.2
- During the same period, most pupils identified as being vulnerable continued to attend school. p.2
- At the time of this inspection, Year 4 pupils were being educated remotely because of COVID-19. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,160
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Peter Higgins Headteacher Heathlands Primary Academy Heath Way Castle Bromwich Birmingham West Midlands B34 6NB
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Heathlands Primary Academy
Following my remote inspection with Mark Howes, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 23 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Heathlands Primary Academy
This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Heathlands Primary Academy
This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Heathlands Primary Academy
The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in September 2019.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Heathlands Primary Academy
Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
support pupils, particularly those who are disadvantaged, who have got out of practice with their writing and arithmetic
p.2
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
refine foundation subject curriculum plans further to identify the core knowledge that pupils need to know as they move through the school, and ensure assessment checks the right things.
p.2
Context
The school’s leadership and staff remain unchanged since the previous inspection.
p.2
Context
Between the start of the spring term and 5 March 2021, all pupils received remote education at some point. Typically, the proportion ranged between 80% and 90%. This included the very few pupils who have an education, health and care plan. During the same period, most pupils identified as being vulnerable continued to attend school.
p.2
Context
At the time of this inspection, Year 4 pupils were being educated remotely because of COVID-19.
p.2
Main findings
In the months following the September 2019 inspection, school leaders pressed on with improvements to the wider curriculum. Plans in subjects such as history and geography were revised to include more details about what pupils needed to learn in different year groups. In addition, staff training helped to strengthen subject leadership. Consequently, by the time the pandemic arrived, the school had already improved the curriculum offer.
p.2
Main findings
These improvements have helped the school to provide meaningful education during the period when schools were only open to some children due to COVID-19 restrictions. This term, until 8 March 2021, the remote education offer included the school’s usual subjects and provided clear guidance about what to do. Staff kept in regular contact with home to check on pupils’ progress, their well-being and whereabouts. Furthermore, teachers provided pupils with feedback and guidance on how to keep on top of their learning and stay healthy. In their comments to Ofsted, parents and pupils expressed positive views about how remote education was managed.
p.2
Main findings
This organised approach to remote learning enabled the school to respond quickly when it was necessary for Year 4 pupils to return to remote education this week. Familiar systems and clear-cut expectations mean that everyone knows what to expect and pupils continue to learn. The school’s systematic approach to teaching phonics and daily routines for reading, for example, have supported pupils throughout the pandemic. Pupils have continued to enjoy listening to stories, have had access to books and have engaged with reading tasks. Recent checks show that most pupils have kept up with reading.
p.2
Main findings
Staff are also checking what pupils know in other subjects. Some of these assessments are based on teachers’ observations and some on tests. In mathematics, staff have found that some pupils’ knowledge of arithmetic, particularly multiplication and division, has slipped. In response, they have adjusted curriculum plans to focus on these aspects. Where needed, pupils receive additional support, either in small groups or in one-to-one sessions outside of the main class. Pupils’ writing has also taken a dip. Some pupils have got out of practice and staff are reminding them about previous learning and expectations. Staff are also setting tasks that build up pupils’ stamina for writing at length.
p.3
Main findings
In the foundation subjects, the school’s curriculum plans set out the content to be covered in different topics and year groups. That said, the core knowledge that pupils need to know and when could be made even clearer. Once this is set out clearly, leaders will be better placed to strengthen assessment in these subjects. Currently, assessment in foundation subjects focuses more on what has been taught than on what pupils know. This is a helpful check on content coverage but is less useful for checking whether pupils actually know more and have made progress. This inspection found that leaders are aware of this and are on the case.
p.3
Main findings
Throughout the period when schools were only open to some children due to COVID-19 restrictions, leaders ensured that pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities continued to access specialist support when needed, with some provided online. Staff are attentive to pupils who may be anxious about returning to the classroom and have in-school support available.
p.3
Main findings
The local governing body asks the right questions and is informed about the school’s work. Governors know that the current priorities are to settle pupils back into school, get them active, and back on track with their learning. They have met regularly throughout the pandemic to steer decision-making and keep an eye on everyone’s welfare.
p.3
Main findings
The trust has supported leaders with policy matters and in practical ways, such as supplying laptops to pupils. Across the trust, there are subject leader networks that enable staff to share and learn from effective practice. These, and input from an executive headteacher and an external education advisory service, have served to improve curriculum leadership and the quality of education across the school.
p.3
Evidence
This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, the chief executive officer of The University of Wolverhampton Multi Academy Trust (UWMAT), an executive headteacher who works across five schools in UWMAT, teaching staff, pupils, and the chair and two governors from the local governing body to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.
p.4
Evidence
We also looked at information on the school’s website and curriculum plans. We observed a reading session. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 41 free-text responses, and 39 staff questionnaires.
p.4
Evidence
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chair of the board of trustees, the chief executive officer of UWMAT, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Birmingham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion