Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 30 Apr 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Alison Stephenson (lead), Christine Watkins

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alison Stephenson, Christine Watkins

  • Postcode verified

    S63 0DS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+1Mixedmore positive than 25% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveconfidentlypreciselyclear
Criticismlimitednot yetabsencenot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings798w+1
  • What needs to improve185w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
966
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%What needs to improve 19%

Full report text

Emma Cadman Principal The Hill Primary Academy Tudor Street Thurnscoe Rotherham South Yorkshire S63 0DS

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Hill Primary Academy

Following my remote inspection with Alison Stephenson, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 23 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances. This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement. This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Hill Primary Academy

site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports. The inspection took place because the school was judged to require improvement at its previous section 5 inspection. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in May 2019. Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to: Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted  ensure that the revised curriculum sets out precisely what pupils should know, and in what order, in all subjects

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 monitor the impact of the curriculum on pupils’ learning and progress.

p.2

Context

 The principal, vice-principal and the special educational needs coordinator have been appointed since the last inspection. The chair of governors took up his role in September 2019.

p.2

Context

 During the period when the school was closed to most pupils, from the start of the spring term, approximately a quarter of pupils attended on site. This included half of vulnerable pupils and the majority of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, 82 pupils from three class ‘bubbles’ in the Reception Year, Year 4 and Year 6 were self-isolating at home.

p.2

Context

 Currently, a small number of staff are absent due to COVID-19. Leaders are managing this absence through a combination of internal and supply staff.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders are taking effective action to provide education in the current circumstances. They have carefully adapted the curriculum to cater for the needs of pupils in school and those who are learning remotely. Leaders have postponed the teaching of ‘hands on’ practical subjects such as art and design and technology until the summer term, for safety reasons. Staff have expanded the current science curriculum to allow for this change.

p.2

Main findings

 Since the last inspection, leaders have revised the school’s curriculum. The curriculum sets out what pupils should know, and when, in most subjects. Leaders plan to complete this work across all subjects over the coming months. Leaders and governors have not been able to check the effectiveness of the revised curriculum, due to COVID-19 restrictions. They do not yet have a clear picture of the impact on pupils’ progress.

p.2

Main findings

 Staff are in the process of checking what pupils remember from the spring term’s teaching in all subjects. Staff are using this information to provide extra support for individuals or small groups, as required.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have rewritten the reading curriculum since the last inspection. All staff have been trained to deliver the new phonics scheme. When an inspector observed pupils reading, it was clear that staff encourage pupils to apply their phonics knowledge when reading unfamiliar words. Pupils read confidently from books that are well-matched to their phonics knowledge.  At the time of this inspection, three class bubbles were self-isolating due to COVID-19. Pupils learning at home can access a range of live and recorded lessons. Staff ensure that remote education matches the curriculum provided on site.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders and staff recognise that pupils with SEND may need a curriculum that is adjusted to their needs. For example, staff may provide activities with enlarged text and visual instructions. Curriculum leaders ensure that the needs of pupils with SEND are an integral part of the subject plans.

p.3

Main findings

 Over the past year, staff have kept in regular contact with the families of vulnerable pupils. They have provided food parcels and resources such as laptops and other devices for home learning.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors continue to meet and oversee the work of the school. They are aware of leaders’ ongoing work to revise the curriculum. They provide support and challenge, prioritising pupils’ safety and the education of vulnerable pupils and pupils with SEND. Governors are mindful of pressures on staff workload and well-being.

p.3

Main findings

 The multi-academy trust has provided support with policies and risk assessments. This has reduced the operational burden on school leaders. Staff appreciate access to central trust services to support their well-being.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, members of staff, the director of primary education from the multi-academy trust and the chair of governors to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils in the current circumstances.

p.3

Evidence

We also observed pupils reading to members of staff and reviewed curriculum plans. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 12 free-text responses, and 17 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer or equivalent of the Astrea multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Barnsley. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion