Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Marathon Science School

Inspected 22 Mar 2021 · published 30 Apr 2021 · URN 135901

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Barnaby Dowell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Mar 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Barnaby Dowell

  • Postcode verified

    SE8 5RQ

  • Name on report verified

    Marathon Science School

  • URN verified

    135901

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−12Mixedmore positive than 18% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveimprovedhappyenjoyindependentclearly
Criticismconcernslimitedconcerning

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings609w−3
  • What needs to improve132w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
741
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 37%

Full report text

Progress monitoring inspection boarding report

p.1

Marathon Science School 1−9 Evelyn Street, Surrey Quays, London SE8 5RQ

p.1

Context of the monitoring visit

Ofsted conducted this on-site visit after receiving responses from children to the recent Ofsted point-in-time survey. Children raised concerns with regards to access to the local area, the restricted use of mobile phones and the quality of the food.

p.1

Context of the monitoring visit

This visit included the inspector holding meetings with children, the school’s independent listener, boarding house staff and the headteacher. The inspector spoke face to face with 19 children. Four parents were also spoken to on the phone.

p.1

Summary of findings

No evidence was found to substantiate the concerns. Children receive a good standard of care. However, shortfalls were identified regarding the recording of incidents and one aspect of the living environment.

p.1

Summary of findings

Children commented that they understand the school’s policy regarding the restricted use of mobile phones. They confirmed that the restrictions were clearly explained to them prior to their arrival and noted that they valued the positive impact that this has on their academic studies.

p.1

Summary of findings

The food provided to children is varied and offers at least two healthy choices each mealtime. Staff strive, and generally succeed, to support the individual tastes of a culturally diverse group of children. Children are consulted on the weekly menu and learn the value of healthy eating.

p.1

Summary of findings

Since the last inspection, the boarding house environment has been improved. Shower rooms on two floors have been completely refurbished. However, despite other improvements, one child’s bed was found to be not large enough, leaving him uncomfortable at night. The head of boarding informed the inspector that a new bed would be ordered immediately. Recordings of incidents involving children offer limited detail and evaluation. For example, one entry concerning an altercation between children had not been completed in full. This meant that there was no recorded outcome to the incident in question. This means it is difficult for managers to track the outcome of incidents or the development of staff.

p.1

Summary of findings

Children told us that they were happy in the boarding house. They said that they enjoy the opportunity to spend time with friends while benefiting from the structured routines provided to them.

p.2

Summary of findings

A new head of boarding began in the role in September 2020. He moved from another position in boarding within the school and is presently mentored by the previous head of boarding. The new head of boarding has completed a management qualification specific to boarding schools and is a designated safeguarding lead. There have been no other staff changes since the last Ofsted inspection in 2019.

p.2

Summary of findings

Feedback from parents was universally positive. Parents spoken with said that they value the impact that boarding has on their child’s academic progress. They also highlighted this as a way of developing social skills and accessing a broader choice of activities.

p.2

Summary of findings

Staff have tried to reduce the impact of the pandemic on children. Additional resources, such as new table tennis tables and an air hockey table, have been purchased to help children to socialise safely together. Children commented that they are excited by the introduction of a new Thursday night cooking club.

p.2

Summary of findings

The rules of the boarding house are appropriate. Boarding staff said that they strictly adhere to government guidance relating to the pandemic. Some children have struggled to adjust to the change of routine, with so much time spent in the boarding house environment. Staff offer children supervised trips to local shops whenever possible.

p.2

Summary of findings

Because of the limited scope of the visit, the recommendations set at the last inspection were not assessed on this occasion. Two additional recommendations, relating to the quality of case recordings and the boarding house environment, have been made following this visit.

p.2

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that all supervision sessions with boarding staff are appropriately recorded.  The registered person should ensure that performance appraisals consider using feedback from children and other professionals to offer a more comprehensive assessment of performance.  The registered person should ensure that a record is kept of all complaints, allowing the more efficient tracking of concerns.  The registered person should ensure that a record is kept of all sanctions given to children, allowing the monitoring of behaviours.  The registered person should ensure that the environment is regularly reviewed to verify that it is meeting the needs of children, for example, that beds are big enough.  The registered person should regularly review the quality of case recordings to ensure that incidents are fully evaluated.

p.3

Information about this school

Marathon Science School is a boarding school for boys. The school is situated in Lewisham and the boarding provision is in Shoreditch. The boarding provision is located within a mosque complex. The school opened in September 2009. The school is registered for 144 pupils. The boarding site can currently accommodate a maximum of 120 boarders between the ages of 10 and 16 years. There are presently 55 pupils, of whom 54 are boarders. Six boarders attend a local schools sixth form and are included on the rolls of both the school and the sixth-form provision. The boys usually go home to their families on alternate weekends. Most of the boys come from London boroughs, although some come from further afield. The proprietors are four trustees of the Seven Hill Education Trust, a registered charitable trust. The school was established with the aim of providing a 24-hour curriculum inspired by Islamic values.

p.3

number

This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989, as amended by the Care Standards Act 2000, having regard to the National Minimum Standards for Boarding Schools.

p.4

number

The inspection was conducted at the request of the registration authority for independent schools in order to monitor the progress the school has made in implementing its action plan following the previous inspection.

p.4

number

Type of school Boarding school Number of boarders on roll 54 Gender of boarders Male Age range of boarders 10 to 19 Headteacher Uzeyir Onur

p.4

inspection

Telephone number 02072 313232 Email address uzeyironur@marathonschool.com achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

inspection

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

inspection

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.5

inspection

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

inspection

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion