Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 30 Apr 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Wilson (lead), Charlie Fordham

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Charlie Fordham, Paul Wilson

  • Postcode verified

    IP2 8PL

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−7Mixedmore positive than 21% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiverigoroushappyeffectivelystrengthssupportivepositivesafe
Criticismconcernsnot alwaysweakernot clearnot rigorous

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1085w−12
  • What needs to improve181w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,248
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Andrew Robinson Principal Stoke High School – Ormiston Academy Maidenhall Approach Ipswich Suffolk IP2 8PL

p.1

– Ormiston Academy

Following my inspection with Paul Wilson, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), and Kim Hall, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 18 and 19 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

– Ormiston Academy

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

– Ormiston Academy

This monitoring inspection was initially carried out remotely but moved to an on-site visit due to significant concerns about safeguarding.

p.1

– Ormiston Academy

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in March 2018.

p.1

– Ormiston Academy

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time: Ofsted

p.1

– Ormiston Academy

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances.

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 implement more rigorous systems to assure themselves that the correct safeguarding actions are in place

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 put in place a more coherent strategy to develop reading, particularly for the weakest readers

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that teachers know how to use information about pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) to help them make the best possible progress.

p.2

Context

 You were previously the head of school and you were appointed as principal in September 2019. The multi-academy trust appointed a new regional director in September 2020. Approximately 50% of the teachers are new since the previous inspection.

p.2

Context

 During the third national lockdown, 90% of pupils were educated at home. During this time, 35% of pupils with an education, health and care plan and 40% of vulnerable pupils were attending on site.

p.2

Context

 At the time of the inspection, 92% of pupils were being educated on site. A small number of pupils were isolating as a result of COVID-19 and studying at home.

p.2

Main findings

 During the current circumstances, leaders have checked on pupils’ participation in remote learning and on their understanding of it. The parents who responded to our survey praised leaders’ recent actions to provide education during the pandemic. Pupils also appreciate teachers’ work to provide remote education, though they are happy to be back on site. Year 7 pupils say staff have helped them settle in well despite the challenges due to COVID-19.

p.2

Main findings

 Over the first national lockdown, you used the time to review the school’s curriculum. Leaders consulted with staff about creating a curriculum appropriate for pupils. You worked with subject leaders to write new curriculum plans for every subject. These plans show that new content builds on what pupils have learned before. Subject leaders and teachers have completed training to help them understand how to put the new curriculum into practice.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have taken effective action to offer the planned curriculum for all subjects in the current circumstances. Subject leaders check the work of teachers. They use these checks to identify and suggest improvements. Teachers make regular checks on pupils’ understanding. They give guidance on how pupils can improve their work and they adapt what pupils learn next. However, teachers in some subjects do this more effectively than others. Leaders are working to address this.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders continue to offer remote learning to pupils who need to study at home. They have adapted the order in which pupils learn some of the content. This is because some content is more suitable for learning at home. Leaders make sure that pupils still have the knowledge they need to understand new learning.

p.3

Main findings

 There are several programmes to support weaker readers. Staff provide individual or small-group support for pupils. However, it is not clear how these different programmes fit together into a wider plan to support reading. The adults providing support do not always know how to help the weakest readers develop their knowledge of phonics.

p.3

Main findings

 Year 11 pupils have continued to study their examination subjects. They say their teachers are preparing them well for assessments at the end of the course. Leaders have ensured pupils get helpful information and advice about careers and their next steps in education.

p.3

Main findings

 Staff have taken appropriate actions to support pupils with SEND during the lockdown. They have helped these pupils to settle back into learning in school. Leaders have identified the pupils’ individual learning needs. They have then put in place specific help. Leaders have ensured that teachers have information about the needs of pupils with SEND. However, teachers do not always know how to use this to help these pupils make the best possible progress.

p.3

Main findings

 Staff have provided helpful support for vulnerable pupils as they return to school. They have checked on their welfare and on their progress in their studies. Leaders have prioritised the teaching of literacy in all subjects. This helps those pupils who speak English is an additional language and vulnerable pupils to learn.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors are committed to the school. They understand the school’s context, its strengths, and the challenges it faces. Governors have been very supportive of leaders’ work during the pandemic. They are starting to ask leaders more challenging questions about whether the actions they are taking are making a positive difference.  The multi-academy trust has increased its support for leaders during this school year. It has given training to help subject leaders plan and put in place the new curriculum. The trust has reviewed the school’s safeguarding and its plans for pupils with SEND. Leaders are currently putting the recommendations from these reviews into practice to improve these areas of the school’s work.

p.3

Main findings

 Safeguarding is effective. Staff make frequent contact with vulnerable pupils who are absent or studying at home. They monitor pupils who speak English as an additional language when they have concerns about them. Leaders have trained staff so that they know how to keep pupils safe. You make and record the appropriate checks when new staff join the school.

p.4

Main findings

 Pupils say they feel safe. They know how they can raise concerns if they have them and how to keep themselves safe online. However, leaders are not rigorous in checking that they have referred concerns to the appropriate external agencies. They are not tenacious in following up with agencies to get the support that pupils with SEND need. The systems leaders use to ensure that appropriate actions are in place and recorded are not as thorough as they could be.

p.4

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely on the first day, and on the school site for the second day. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, representatives of the multi- academy trust, pupils, staff and representatives of those responsible for governance to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.4

Evidence

We also inspected the school’s safeguarding systems and records. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 11 free-text responses, and 50 staff questionnaires.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Ormiston Academies Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Suffolk. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion