Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Eleanor Belfield

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Eleanor Belfield

  • Postcode verified

    NE3 3RU

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveknowledgeablesettled
Criticismlimitednot confidentlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings906w+25
  • What needs to improve171w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,063
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Sarah Holmes-Carne Principal Kenton School Drayton Road Newcastle-upon-Tyne Tyne and Wear NE3 3RU

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Kenton School

Following my remote inspection with Eleanor Belfield, Her Majesty's Inspector (HMI), of your school on 18 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Kenton School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted's published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Kenton School

This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Kenton School

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in February 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Kenton School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that there is sufficient emphasis on the subject content and knowledge taught to pupils as the key stage 3 curriculum is developed

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 provide subject leaders with further training on the principles of effective curriculum design.

p.2

Context

 Since the previous inspection, there have been several changes in senior leadership and governance. The trust appointed a new chief executive in September 2019. The chair of the trust took up office in March 2021. Three assistant principals have also been appointed since the last inspection.

p.2

Context

 Approximately 95% of pupils were educated at home in the spring term, before the school re-opened to all pupils. During that time, 45% of vulnerable pupils and 65% of pupils with an education, health and care plan were educated on site.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, approximately 95% of pupils were attending on site.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders and those responsible for governance have ensured that education continued throughout the period when schools were only open to some pupils due to COVID-19 restrictions. You planned carefully how to deliver education remotely. Teachers used a blended approach of workbooks, online activities and some live lessons. Pupils’ initial engagement in remote learning was low. Some pupils lacked computer hardware and wi-fi access. You provided almost 30% of pupils at the school with a laptop. As a result of this endeavour, pupils’ engagement with remote education increased. These measures will remain in place for pupils who may still need to learn from home.

p.2

Main findings

 Almost all pupils have returned to school following the period when schools were only open to some pupils due to COVID-19 restrictions. You told us that pupils returned to school enthusiastically. Leaders are determined to resume the normal curriculum quickly. The school has developed a programme of personal development to support pupils’ well-being as they return to the classroom. This work is necessary to get pupils settled back into school and back on track.

p.2

Main findings

 You have surveyed pupils about their learning and welfare every half term throughout the pandemic. During the periods of remote education, you used short, regular tests to find out what pupils had learned and remembered. As a result of this, teachers have made sensible decisions about what will be taught to Year 11 and Year 13 as they complete their GCSE and A level courses.

p.2

Main findings

 You have recently changed the school’s curriculum. You explained that this is to cover the national curriculum in greater breadth and depth in key stage 3. Teachers have carefully considered how subjects are taught and how pupils will be assessed. However, there is more work to do to ensure teachers deliver the right knowledge in the correct sequence in all subjects.

p.3

Main findings

 Vulnerable pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) receive extra support and help. Specialist external support, such as speech and language therapy, continued during the period when schools were closed to pupils in the spring term. Pupils with SEND have had their support plans updated and receive extra help as they return to the classroom. This support is effective because you have targeted it to those who need it most.

p.3

Main findings

 Early in Year 7, teachers identify pupils who are not confident in reading. They are supported with extra reading sessions. There is a phonics programme in place for the weakest readers. You recognise that there is more work to do to improve the reading and vocabulary of pupils, so that they can better read and understand texts in their other subjects.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors are knowledgeable about the community and the school. They understand how the pandemic has affected the long-term and short-term priorities of the school. Governors have made strategic decisions during the pandemic, such as curriculum change and the development of remote education. They have made sure that there is external support for the school, and they regularly assess how effective this support is. As a result of this work, governors provide appropriate challenge and help to the school.

p.3

Main findings

 The school is drawing on support from a range of external partners, including other schools and a national leader of education. This support is focused on strategic developments such as the curriculum and subject leadership. The school has also used other local networks and local authority support to make things work during the pandemic. This collaborative work is effective.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We held meetings with the headteacher, other senior leaders, representatives of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority. We also held discussions with pupils and staff, to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 15 free-text responses, and 176 staff questionnaires. I am copying this letter to the chair of the local governing body, the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Kenton Schools Academy Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Newcastle. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion