Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 29 Apr 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Heather Simpson (lead), Heather Phillips

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Heather Phillips, Heather Simpson

  • Postcode verified

    ST17 9DR

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−25Mixedmore positive than 13% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseconsistentsafe
Criticismlimitednot clearnot knowledgeable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings928w−25
  • What needs to improve153w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,066
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Joanne Banks Headteacher Flash Ley Primary School Hawksmoor Road Stafford Staffordshire ST17 9DR

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Flash Ley Primary School

Following my remote inspection with Heather Simpson, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 25 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Flash Ley Primary School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Flash Ley Primary School

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Flash Ley Primary School

The inspection took place because the school has received three successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in June 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Flash Ley Primary School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 develop the curriculum in the remaining foundation subjects so that pupils’ knowledge, skills and subject-specific vocabulary build over time

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure governors fully understand the school’s curriculum and know how the quality of education being provided is monitored.

p.2

Context

 Since the previous inspection, the following staff have been appointed: the early years/key stage 1 leader, the special educational needs coordinator and the office manager.

p.2

Context

 During autumn 2020, about a quarter of pupils received remote education at some point in the term.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, two fifths of pupils were being educated in school. Four fifths of pupils identified as being vulnerable, and just under a half of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), were attending school.

p.2

Main findings

 Before the pandemic, leaders had revised curriculum plans so that the sequence of learning was mapped out in more detail. These improvements span most subjects. Some subject planning such as English, mathematics and science is further ahead. Other subjects, including history and computing, have been mapped out during the pandemic. However, a few remaining subjects still need further development.

p.2

Main findings

 A structured approach to curriculum planning has helped staff to plan remote education. Currently, whether at home or in school, pupils are studying all their usual subjects. In most cases, teachers follow existing curriculum plans. Some content has been reordered to make activities more manageable at home. In art, and design and technology, lessons are very different to usual. This is due to families not having the necessary resources at home. In both subjects, staff have created new activities to keep pupils interested and engaged.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have thought carefully about managing the learning of pupils being taught in school and at home. The arrangements in place allow pupils to move seamlessly between being educated in school and remotely if needed, such as children of part-time key workers. The school’s remote offer includes a mix of recorded lessons, videos and other activities. Not all activities take place on computers and many pupils use pencil and paper methods to access learning and record their ideas. Leaders have listened to families about what is working well for them.  Leaders monitor pupils’ engagement with remote learning. If a pupil is not taking part, then staff email or telephone home to find out why, and to offer support. When necessary, pupils who find it hard to work at home are asked to come into school. Staff keep in contact with professional services, such as social services, as part of their checks on pupils’ welfare.

p.2

Main findings

 The school’s online platform allows pupils to access work at their level. Pupils with SEND or those who need extra guidance benefit from the bespoke resources provided. Pupils who speak English as an additional language have their learning materials adapted for them. Work for these pupils includes carefully chosen language so pupils can understand. Regular contact with pupils and their families helps to keep extra support targeted at the right things.

p.3

Main findings

 The school has a structured phonics programme and daily routines for teaching reading. Staff have made e-books available to pupils at home and provide phonically decodable books. Teachers provide extra reading support, if needed, for vulnerable pupils who are taught in school. There is a consistent approach to the teaching of reading in all year groups.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders have prioritised pupils’ mental health and well-being. Pupils are taught to keep themselves safe and how to manage their feelings as part of the curriculum. A range of enrichment activities are available for pupils, some taking place in school and others remotely. These include yoga, steel pans, singing and taking part in the RSPB’s bird watch.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors receive regular information from school leaders about the work of the school. However, governors are not suitably knowledgeable about the school’s current curriculum offer. They are not clear about which subjects are being developed and which need further work. Governors could not explain how the curriculum is monitored. Nor could they articulate the impact of recent developments.

p.3

Main findings

 External support, brokered through the local authority, is helping the school move forwards. The school is receiving support from a teaching school and some other advisers. The school’s improvement partner reports that the school is prioritising the right things at this time. He is aware some aspects of the curriculum still need further work.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, the chair and vice-chair of governors and the school’s improvement partner from the local authority to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown. We also looked at remote education resources, examples of pupils’ work and information on the school’s website. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 17 free-text responses, and 22 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Staffordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion