Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 29 Apr 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dale Burr (lead), Julie Carrington

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Dale Burr, Julie Carrington

  • Postcode verified

    TQ12 1PT

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−6Mixedmore positive than 21% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepreciselovesuccessfullyswiftlyconsistentaccurately
Criticismnot yetlimitedgapsmissedabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings960w−2
  • What needs to improve156w−20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,102
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Kelly Dunne Headteacher St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School Highweek Newton Abbot Devon TQ12 1PT

p.1

School

Following my remote inspection with Dale Burr, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 4 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

School

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

School

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in February 2020.

p.1

School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 rigorously ensure that the headteacher implements curriculum plans which enable pupils to gain the knowledge they require for the next stage of their education.

p.2

Context

 Since the last inspection in February 2020, there have been several changes to the leadership of mathematics. A substantive member of staff returned from extended absence in June 2020. Three governors have left, and two governors joined in September 2020.

p.2

Context

 Across the autumn term 2020, approximately 40% of pupils had to be educated remotely. Years 1 and 2 were more affected than other year groups.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, 35% of pupils were being educated on site. Approximately 50% of vulnerable pupils and 40% of pupils with an education, health and care plan were attending on site.

p.2

Main findings

 Immediately after the last inspection, you set out your plans to tackle the areas identified for improvement. Shortly after this, COVID-19 restrictions came into place. Despite this, your commitment to drive whole-school improvement did not falter. Your actions to provide staff with substantial training to develop their subject knowledge in English and mathematics is already paying dividends.

p.2

Main findings

 When pupils returned to school in September 2020, you identified that many had gaps in their knowledge and understanding. Swiftly, staff readjusted teaching plans to resolve any missed learning. By December 2020, such actions helped many pupils to improve their writing, and remember their number facts, with greater accuracy than before. Alongside this, you were quick in upskilling staff and pupils in using new digital technologies to strengthen the school’s remote education offer.

p.2

Main findings

 Since January 2021, vulnerable pupils and the children of key workers, who are learning in school, follow the same curriculum content as pupils who are learning at home. Teachers are checking pupils’ understanding of important knowledge and this is helping teachers to plan sequences of lessons with more precision. Pupils who are identified for additional support in reading, writing and mathematics have continued to receive extra teaching sessions in school. This is not yet the case for some pupils who are learning at home.

p.2

Main findings

 You are making headway in upgrading the whole-school approach to teaching reading. Many pupils are benefiting from a more challenging reading curriculum. It is helping them gain a greater understanding of what they read. All staff are receiving ongoing phonics training. Week-on-week, staff are gaining more confidence in teaching this new and consistent approach. Increasingly, they make precise checks to find out whether pupils are mastering the sounds that letters make. Pupils have increased opportunities to practise and apply their reading each day. As such, many pupils are learning more and reading with greater accuracy.

p.2

Main findings

 In addition to phonics teaching, the early years leader and her staff are implementing a well-thought-out approach to develop children’s speaking skills, role-play, and love of stories. As such, more children are speaking in full and extended sentences than before.

p.3

Main findings

 Beyond English and mathematics, all other subject leaders are receiving the comprehensive training they need to understand their roles and responsibilities in full. Importantly, subject leaders have revamped curriculum plans so they set out the essential knowledge that pupils need to know and by when they need to know it. However, leaders’ actions to implement these new plans are in their infancy.

p.3

Main findings

 The special educational needs coordinator is in regular contact with pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and their families. She ensures that pupils’ pastoral and academic needs are identified accurately. As headteacher, you make sure that teachers provide pupils with the additional resources they need to learn successfully whether they are at school or at home.

p.3

Main findings

 The multi-academy trust has stringent systems to check the remote education the school provides. The local governing body asks precise questions about pupils’ attendance and gains assurances about safeguarding practices in school. However, it is not yet holding leaders to account sufficiently when it comes to implementing the school’s curriculum plans. Governors are not challenging leaders firmly about how well pupils, including those with SEND, are being prepared for their next stage of education.

p.3

Main findings

 The trust has brokered much external subject support. Leaders and teachers are receiving a wide-ranging package of reading, writing and mathematics training from external providers. The trust is bolstering subject leadership by pairing new subject leaders with experienced subject leaders from another school. This work is already strengthening subject leaders’ knowledge and skills markedly.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other staff members, the director of education for Plymouth CAST multi-academy trust, governors and the school’s education standards manager to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown. We also looked at pupils’ work, listened to pupils read, and examined school and trust minutes of meetings. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 18 free-text responses, and 13 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of Plymouth CAST multi-academy trust, the director of education for the Diocese of Plymouth, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Devon. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion