Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 29 Apr 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Alice Roberts (lead), Lee Selby

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alice Roberts, Lee Selby

  • Postcode verified

    ME6 5HS

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−58Criticalmore positive than 6% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisepositiveskilledfeel safe
Criticismconcernsweaknessespoorat riskgapsharm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1192w−58
  • What needs to improve228w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,399
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Glenn Prebble Head of School Holmesdale School Malling Road Snodland Kent ME6 5HS

p.1

Additional monitoring inspection of Holmesdale School

Following my inspection with Alice Roberts, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), to your school on 10 and 12 February, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional monitoring inspection of Holmesdale School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require special measures.

p.1

Additional monitoring inspection of Holmesdale School

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was initially carried out remotely but moved to an on-site visit due to significant concerns about safeguarding.

p.1

Additional monitoring inspection of Holmesdale School

The inspection took place because the school was judged to require special measures at its previous section 5 inspection. The school’s most recent Section 5 inspection took place in February 2018.

p.1

Additional monitoring inspection of Holmesdale School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 rapidly improve the culture of safeguarding so that all relevant members of staff can access a single record of documentation relating to the welfare of all vulnerable pupils

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that leaders responsible for safeguarding are aware of and apply all of their statutory duties in line with the latest government legislation.

p.2

Context

 The local authority commissioned Swale Academies Trust (SAT) to lead the school following the departure of the previous headteacher in December 2018. The current executive headteacher, head of school and designated safeguarding leader are employed by SAT. There is an interim executive board (IEB) in place and a new chair was appointed in July 2019. There are currently no students in Year 13.

p.2

Context

 Approximately 70% of pupils were educated remotely at some point during the autumn term of 2020 because of the need to self-isolate.

p.2

Context

 Just over 10% of pupils are being educated on site currently. This includes fewer than half of the pupils with education, health and care (EHC) plans for their special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The number of vulnerable pupils attending school has increased as the term has progressed. Around 40% of pupils attending school are children of key workers.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have continued to make improvements to the curriculum and pupils’ learning despite the challenges of the current pandemic. Many parents who completed our survey recognise the improvements being made to the school and are grateful for the efforts to provide appropriate education remotely.

p.2

Main findings

 Education is being provided in all subjects. A small but growing number of pupils in key stage 4 are now studying a broader and appropriately challenging curriculum, because subjects like Spanish have been introduced. There has been a renewed emphasis on personal development and pupils’ health and well-being.

p.2

Main findings

 Teachers have adapted the order in which topics are taught in some subjects. Face to face teaching time between lockdowns has been used thoughtfully to fill gaps in pupils’ knowledge and to teach those elements of the curriculum that would be most difficult to teach remotely. A similar approach has been taken during the current lockdown, with some trickier topics in mathematics and science postponed until pupils all return to school. Teachers have slowed the pace of teaching in modern foreign languages to give pupils working remotely more time to practise and rehearse what they have learned.  A greater number of vulnerable pupils are coming to school than in previous lockdowns. The number of pupils attending school is increasing as staff use their regular welfare checks to identify additional pupils who may benefit from being in school. Some more able pupils in Year 11 who would have been preparing for examinations have been invited into school

p.2

Main findings

 Pupils attending school are receiving the same curriculum that is being taught remotely, through a balance of live and recorded lessons. Pupils in school have additional support from staff working in school to help them. Pupils that we met were very positive about this and valued the extra support they are receiving.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders are checking on the well-being and progress of pupils with EHC plans when they are not attending school. Teachers demonstrated to us how the usual curriculum is planned to meet the needs of pupils with SEND. For example, teachers use live modelling of new concepts and knowledge, such as chemical equations in science. Teachers and pupils told us that the techniques we saw being used remotely mirror the ‘Holmesdale homestyle’ approach that is used in school.

p.3

Main findings

 The members of the IEB are experienced and skilled and have a thorough understanding of the substantial improvements that have been made to the curriculum by having a stable staff group. Staff who completed our survey are overwhelmingly positive about all aspects of the school.

p.3

Main findings

 The IEB hold leaders to account for all aspects of improvement and provide careful support where needed. Despite their regular checks on safeguarding, and the assurances they were given by leaders, members were not aware of some of the weaknesses identified during this inspection. The IEB are resolute in their determination to put them right quickly.

p.3

Main findings

 The local authority monitors the work of SAT leading the school using external consultants and contractors. The local authority has not independently audited safeguarding arrangements since 2018.

p.3

Main findings

 Weaknesses in safeguarding procedures identified in both the previous inspection and subsequent monitoring visit in 2018, and in the local authority’s audit in 2018, remain. These weaknesses relate to the effectiveness of leaders responsible for safeguarding fulfilling aspects of their statutory duties and how records about vulnerable pupils, including those attending alternative provision, are kept.

p.3

Main findings

 The school simultaneously operates multiple recording systems relating to safeguarding. This does not match the school’s own policy and allows for duplication and omission which could put pupils at risk of harm. Inspectors observed mismatches in information within different systems. Some members of staff hold records of a safeguarding nature in their own separate files rather than in safeguarding records.

p.3

Main findings

 Inspectors found examples of poor practice where key conversations and decision making between safeguarding leaders and other professionals relating to vulnerable pupils were not recorded. Leaders responsible for training all staff in safeguarding were not following the statutory guidance themselves.

p.4

Main findings

 Senior leaders had not spotted these weaknesses through their routine monitoring. Nonetheless, leaders took swift action, during the inspection, to start to change procedures.

p.4

Main findings

 All pupils are known well as individuals by at least one adult in school and during this lockdown have had their welfare checked regularly. Pupils we met in school told us they feel safe and have someone to talk to if they have any concerns. Pupils have a confidential text system to inform staff of any concerns they have when out of school.

p.4

Evidence

This inspection was initially conducted remotely but moved to an on-site visit due to concerns about safeguarding. The inspection was paused on the 11 February because leaders closed the school site to pupils due to poor weather conditions.

p.4

Evidence

We spoke to you, the executive headteacher, other senior leaders, designated safeguarding leaders, subject leaders and leaders responsible for provision for pupils with SEND. We also met with the chief executive officer of Swale Academies Trust, the chair and another member of the interim executive board and a representative of the local authority. We also held a telephone conversation with the director of education for Kent County Council. We talked to pupils who were attending the school site. All of these conversations allowed us to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown and the effectiveness of safeguarding procedures.

p.4

Evidence

We also looked at a sample of recordings of remote lessons, curriculum plans, and examples of pupils’ work completed during the current lockdown. We looked at a wide range of documentation that was related to safeguarding. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 24 free-text responses, and 44 staff questionnaires. We telephoned a small number of parents.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the interim executive board, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Kent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion