Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Apr 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Eleanor Belfield

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Eleanor Belfield

  • Postcode verified

    DL21 2AN

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+66Positivemore positive than 64% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveclearknowledgeableclearly
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings926w+66
  • What needs to improve153w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,065
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Jonathan Lumb Principal Haughton Academy Salters Lane South Darlington County Durham DL21 2AN

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Haughton Academy

Following my remote inspection with Eleanor Belfield, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 24 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Haughton Academy

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Haughton Academy

This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Haughton Academy

The inspection took place because the school has received three successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in June 2018.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Haughton Academy

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 implement the planned reading strategy, so that pupils gain the language comprehension they need as a foundation for future learning

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that the curriculum changes you have made mean that pupils know more and remember more of what they have learned.

p.2

Context

 Three new governors have joined the governing body since the last inspection. In December 2020, the trust appointed a new chair of governors.

p.2

Context

 Approximately 90% of pupils were educated at home in the spring term, before the school reopened to all pupils. During that time, 25% of vulnerable pupils and 25% of pupils with an education, health and care plan were educated on site.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, approximately 95% of pupils were attending on site.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders and those responsible for governance have ensured that education continued throughout the period when schools were only open to some pupils due to COVID-19 restrictions. All pupils studied the usual curriculum, whether learning at home or in school. You made some curriculum changes to adapt to the periods of remote learning. For example, in art, you moved a Year 8 topic requiring the use of clay for sculpture until later in the year. This is because it was not possible to do this at home. However, in some other subjects, you have kept to your original plans. For example, in geography, teachers continued teaching urbanisation because this knowledge was necessary for future learning. You have a clear curriculum plan for each subject.

p.2

Main findings

 During the period when schools were only open to some pupils due to COVID- 19 restrictions, you planned carefully how to deliver education remotely. Pupils followed their normal daily timetable. Remote learning was a combination of live, online lessons and time given to pupils to work independently. Pupils’ engagement was high because you ensured that lessons could be accessed using mobile phones as well as laptops and tablets. If pupils need to learn from home in future, the work will be online at the same time as their normal lesson. These measures have made remote learning effective.

p.2

Main findings

 In 2019, you reviewed and changed the school’s curriculum. You have allocated more time to key stage 3. This curriculum development is now in place. Subject leaders have considered the content and sequence of the knowledge that pupils need. You acknowledge that the next step is to evaluate how effective this curriculum is in ensuring that pupils know more and remember more.

p.2

Main findings

 Teachers have thought carefully about how to assess pupils’ knowledge and understanding as they return to the classroom. Teachers begin each lesson with a short quiz to see what pupils can remember from previous topics. As a result of this, you are making changes to your planned curriculum. For example, in French and Spanish, pupils need more practice at speaking and listening. This approach is effective because it is helping you to identify what pupils need to learn next.

p.3

Main findings

 Pupils in Year 11 told us about their plans for their next steps in education, employment or training. They said that the careers advice and guidance provided by the school has continued throughout the pandemic. They found this advice useful. As a result, pupils are clear about their next step in education. You have communicated clearly with Year 11 pupils about how they will be assessed for their GCSE courses. Year 11 pupils told us that they feel reassured.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders have ensured that pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) have the support they need. Teachers have received recent training to adapt lesson activities to help pupils with SEND understand their work. Pupils with SEND continue to access specialist external support. This support is effective because you have targeted it to those who need it most.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors are knowledgeable about the community and the school. They have remained in regular contact with school leaders. Governors have carried out their strategic responsibilities during the pandemic. For example, they have continued to monitor the curriculum changes. Governors regularly assess the impact of actions outlined in the school’s improvement plans. The work of governors is effective.

p.3

Main findings

 The school is drawing on support from external partners and local networks. This support includes working with other schools and a national leader of education. This work is focused on strategic developments such as curriculum planning and subject leadership. This is bringing about change and it is effective.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, the multi-academy trust chief executive officer, pupils, staff and representatives of those responsible for governance to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 41 free-text responses, and 52 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Education Village Academy Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Darlington. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion