Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Apr 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Helen Williams

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Helen Williams

  • Postcode verified

    NN1 4LR

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−27Mixedmore positive than 12% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffective
Criticismlimitedgapsmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings874w−27
  • What needs to improve166w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,026
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Luci Clapton Head of School Stimpson Avenue Academy Stimpson Avenue Northampton Northamptonshire NN1 4LR

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Stimpson Avenue Academy

Following my remote inspection with Caroline Poole, Seconded Inspector, of your school on 16 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Stimpson Avenue Academy

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Stimpson Avenue Academy

This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Stimpson Avenue Academy

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in July 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Stimpson Avenue Academy

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 monitor the implementation of the curriculum in all subjects, to check the impact it is having on what pupils know and remember.

p.2

Context

 Since the last inspection, the senior leadership team has changed. The executive headteacher took over leadership of the school in 2019 and, as of September 2020, the two assistant headteachers were promoted to deputy headteacher and head of school. The leader for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) joined in the autumn term. The trust formed the governing body.

p.2

Context

 During the recent national lockdown, approximately two thirds of pupils were learning at home. All the school’s vulnerable pupils and most of the school’s pupils with an education, health and care plan.

p.2

Context

 Currently, almost all pupils are in school. The pupils who are continuing to learn at home are shielding.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have made sure that pupils have had access to education during the pandemic. Throughout the recent lockdown, teachers provided online lessons for pupils. These were closely matched to the school’s usual curriculum. Leaders gave pupils who could not get online laptops or access to the internet.

p.2

Main findings

 Before the start of the pandemic, school staff redesigned the curriculum. Subject leaders from schools across the trust worked together. They planned out what they wanted pupils to know, and how knowledge would build over time. Leaders started to implement this curriculum before the pandemic hit. Due to the pandemic, leaders have done what they can to monitor the curriculum. However, they are aware that they will need to measure the impact once all pupils return to school.

p.2

Main findings

 Teachers are adapting the school’s curriculum due to the restrictions of the pandemic. When pupils were learning at home, teachers changed some curriculum content. For example, Year 1 pupils were learning about their local area. Teachers combined physical education (PE) and geography, asking families to get on their bikes or walk to find local features. So that they can cover everything they need to, teachers have moved some content to later in the year. For example, pupils will learn how to use apparatus in gymnastics during the summer term.

p.2

Main findings

 Teachers use different methods to spot what pupils can and cannot remember. These methods include quizzes, recapping previous learning, and giving pupils organisers which show the key knowledge in a subject. In the next few weeks, teachers will check further what pupils have learned in English and mathematics. Teachers will cover any gaps or missed content over the summer term.

p.2

Main findings

 The school’s programme for teaching reading carried on during the lockdown. Teachers continued with daily phonics lessons. Pupils at home and in school learned sounds appropriate to their stage of learning. They have learned the same number of sounds as they would have had they all been in school.

p.3

Main findings

 For pupils learning at home, teachers set tasks linked to the content covered by pupils in school. There are plans for these pupils to join in with lessons via video.

p.3

Main findings

 The school’s leader for pupils with SEND, the special educational needs coordinator, is providing training and support for staff. This includes helping staff to identify pupils who might have SEND and how to adapt the curriculum for pupils. Leaders are continuing with the strategies which worked well during lockdown now that all pupils have returned to school. For example, teachers ask these pupils questions during lessons, or by make sure that adults are close by to give support.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors know what the school needs to do next to continue to improve. They say they have adopted a ‘no excuses’ culture. They are checking the work of leaders such as asking how effective the new curriculum is or how catch up funding is benefiting pupils.

p.3

Main findings

 The trust has provided significant support for curriculum development. Subject leaders speak highly of the support they have received. This includes the subject networks set up across the trust. When designing the curriculum, the trust sought advice and guidance from subject specialist organisations.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, the executive headteacher, deputy headteacher, subject leaders, the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the lead academy improvement partner, academy improvement partner and the head of standards and performance, pupils, staff and representatives of those responsible for governance to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We also listened to pupils read and scrutinised curriculum documents available on the school’s website. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 14 free-text responses, and 32 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer or equivalent of the East Midlands Multi-Academy Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Northamptonshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion