Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
Tim Vaughan (lead), John Donald
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
John Donald, Tim Vaughan
- Postcode verified
PR5 0DR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to: Ofsted p.1
- Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted p.1
- Since the last inspection, two teachers have left the school. p.2
- Two members of the governing body have resigned. p.2
- A new staff governor has been appointed. p.2
- Approximately two fifths of all pupils were educated at home in the spring term before the school reopened to all pupils. p.2
- During the same period, approximately one third of vulnerable pupils attended school. p.2
- For every 10 pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), approximately eight pupils attended school. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,207
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mark Melling Headteacher Brindle Gregson Lane Primary School Gregson Lane Preston Lancashire PR5 0DR
p.1
School
Following my remote inspection with Tim Vaughan, Her Majesty's Inspector (HMI), of your school on 25 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.
p.1
School
This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted's published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.
p.1
School
This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.
p.1
School
The inspection took place because the school was judged to require improvement at its previous section 5 inspection. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in April 2019.
p.1
School
Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
to provide education in the current circumstances.
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to: Ofsted
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted develop the use of assessment systems across the curriculum to identify what knowledge pupils have forgotten, and use this to plan pupils’ new learning
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
improve subject leaders’ knowledge of the early years so that that they can better plan the key stage 1 subject curriculums.
p.2
Context
Since the last inspection, two teachers have left the school. Two members of the governing body have resigned. A new staff governor has been appointed.
p.2
Context
Approximately two fifths of all pupils were educated at home in the spring term before the school reopened to all pupils. During the same period, approximately one third of vulnerable pupils attended school. For every 10 pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), approximately eight pupils attended school.
p.2
Context
At the time of this inspection, most pupils were attending school. A small proportion of pupils were being educated remotely.
p.2
Main findings
Prior to the pandemic, you and the senior leaders had begun to redesign the curriculum. You identified that the previous curriculum did not allow pupils to develop essential knowledge in a wide range of subjects. As a result, you and subject leaders have improved the curriculum planning in several subjects, including English, history and geography. However, the implementation of these plans faltered at the outset of the pandemic. During the first period when schools were closed to most pupils, the curriculum offer was reduced as the delivery of English and mathematics took precedence. This hindered leaders’ ability to put their new curriculums for a broader range of subjects into place.
p.2
Main findings
The redesign and improvements of the school’s curriculum that began prior to the pandemic have been further delayed because subject leaders do not have a secure understanding of the early years curriculum. As a result, curriculum plans for key stage 1 do not build on the skills and knowledge that children acquire by the end of the Reception Year.
p.2
Main findings
Since the autumn term 2020, the staff have developed and improved the remote education offer. As teachers have become more proficient in delivering remote education, pupils are now studying more subjects. Since the autumn term 2020, there has been a renewed focus on delivering learning in subjects such as art and music. This supports pupils to catch up on content that was not taught when they were being educated remotely in the summer term 2020. You have ensured that pupils, including vulnerable pupils and those with SEND, have had access to suitable electronic devices. As a result, pupils who are currently self-isolating can continue to access education remotely.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers have systems in place to identify the knowledge that they want pupils to learn in English and mathematics. This helps teachers to check what pupils have learned and remembered. This information is used to plan new learning. This is particularly useful to plan support for vulnerable pupils and those with SEND in English and mathematics. This is not the case in other subjects because teachers have not developed systems to help them check what knowledge pupils may have forgotten of their prior learning.
p.3
Main findings
Pupils in school, and those working remotely, continue to receive their usual phonics and reading programme. Pupils have access to books and online reading resources. These books enable pupils to practise new sounds and read unfamiliar words. Staff have received training in the delivery of reading and phonics. This helps them to support children in the early years and older pupils to catch up with their reading and phonics if they fall behind.
p.3
Main findings
Vulnerable pupils and those with SEND receive effective support in school and when working remotely. Parents and carers are appreciative of the staff's efforts to support their children’s learning and well-being. The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) has trained teachers and support staff well. This has helped these staff to better meet the specific needs of pupils. The SENCo continues to work with a range of services to ensure that children with SEND receive specialist support.
p.3
Main findings
In recent months, governors have developed their expertise. This means that they have a secure understanding of their roles to support and hold school leaders to account. They know the school well. Despite the challenges posed by the pandemic, they have continued to fulfil their responsibilities. They have provided strong challenge to you and school leaders about the remote education offer. They have held you to account in relation to the delayed implementation of the wider curriculum plans. Governors ensure that vulnerable pupils and those with SEND are well cared for and challenged academically.
p.3
Main findings
The local authority has worked closely with you and other leaders in recent months. They have been instrumental in the improvements of the governance. They have helped you to further improve the support that is offered to pupils with SEND. Due to your retirement at the end of the spring term, the local authority has identified appropriate support to strengthen the school's leadership capacity. They have put plans in place to support the deputy headteacher in his new role as acting headteacher in the summer term.
p.3
Evidence
This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders and a group of teachers and support staff. As well as this, we spoke to pupils and listened to them read to a trusted adult. We met with two representatives of the local authority and four members of the governing body, including the chair of governors, to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.
p.4
Evidence
We also reviewed school curriculum plans and scrutinised minutes of governing body minutes. We looked at the 65 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including the 64 free-text responses, and the 10 responses to the staff questionnaire.
p.4
Evidence
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Lancashire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion