Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Apr 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrea Batley (lead), Vic Wilkinson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrea Batley, Vic Wilkinson

  • Postcode verified

    S65 4JG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+29Mostly positivemore positive than 39% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivepositiveaccuratesafe
Criticismlimitednot clearnot accurate

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings840w+29
  • What needs to improve159w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
982
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Robyn Parry-McDermott Headteacher Thrybergh Primary School Oldgate Lane Thrybergh Rotherham South Yorkshire S65 4JG

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Thrybergh Primary School

Following my remote inspection with Andrea Batley, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 17 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Thrybergh Primary School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Thrybergh Primary School

This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Thrybergh Primary School

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in October 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Thrybergh Primary School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 set out what pupils are expected to learn in reading at each point throughout key stage 2

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 implement fully the school’s assessment procedures so that teachers check on what pupils know and remember in each subject.

p.2

Context

 Since the last inspection, there have been two chairs of the governing body. The current chair has held the position previously.

p.2

Context

 When the school was only open to some children due to COVID-19 restrictions at the start of the spring term, around three quarters of pupils were educated at home. Around three quarters of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) were educated on site. A similar proportion of vulnerable pupils were also educated on site.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, all pupils were attending on site.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have planned a broad curriculum, which is designed for the pupils at the school. The curriculum sets out what pupils are expected to know, remember and do in all subjects throughout their time in school. Leaders have identified important concepts, such as ‘community’, that they want pupils to understand in depth. The curriculum regularly revisits these concepts to help pupils understand them better. The impact of COVID-19 has slowed work on the curriculum. Plans are at an early stage of being implemented.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have developed a programme called ‘broadening horizons’. This sets out what pupils will experience to help them learn the curriculum. Leaders have ensured that this programme has continued throughout the pandemic. Recently, pupils have undertaken a virtual trip to Chester Zoo, worked with staff from a local museum and have joined in workshops about the Second World War.

p.2

Main findings

 Some changes have been made to the curriculum as a result of COVID-19. Content in some subjects, including physical education and music, has been adapted or moved to be taught at a later time. Teachers have checked which parts of the curriculum have not been learned well enough while some pupils have been learning remotely. Teachers are reteaching the important parts.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have designed a new assessment system to check on how well pupils remember what has been taught in all subjects. However, this has not been fully implemented.  Phonics is taught well. Teachers know which sounds pupils should know and when. Pupils use their phonics knowledge well to help them read unfamiliar words. The books that pupils read match the sounds that they know.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have set out what they want pupils to learn in reading in key stage 2. However, these plans do not make clear enough what will be taught and when. This means that teachers cannot make accurate checks on how pupils are progressing or identify quickly enough where extra help is needed.

p.3

Main findings

 The majority of vulnerable pupils and those with SEND were educated on site during the spring term. Teachers provided extra help to those who needed it. Teachers regularly checked on those learning remotely to make sure that they were well and completing their work. Leaders followed up to provide help and support where needed.

p.3

Main findings

 The governing body has an accurate view of how effective the school is. Governors have challenged and supported leaders’ work to develop the curriculum and to provide education in the current circumstances. They have checked on how well leaders have kept pupils and staff safe. The governing body has continued to check on staff well-being and workload throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

p.3

Main findings

 The trust has helped leaders to develop their curriculum. It has provided extra devices so pupils learning remotely can access their lessons. The trust has also helped leaders to identify and reduce the risks of COVID-19. Leaders are highly positive about the support that they have received from the trust.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, the assistant headteacher, two representatives of the multi-academy trust, and those responsible for governance to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We also met with a group of staff, listened to pupils read to adults in school and looked at examples of remote learning. We spoke to the leaders responsible for the curriculum, reading and SEND. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including three free-text responses, and 11 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chair of the board of trustees, the chief executive officer of the Wickersley Partnership Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Rotherham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion