Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
22 Apr 2021
- URN verified
EY454082
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families4
“Some parents did not feel they were informed about accidents.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 389
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 19%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills is leading Ofsted's work into how regulated early years and childcare providers in England have delivered child- centred practice and care, within the context of the restrictions placed on society during the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic.
p.1
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the¿ Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage . If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 8 April 2021, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. On 22 April 2021, we carried out a regulatory telephone call. We found the provider was meeting requirements with regard to having first aid trained staff who were able to attend to children who have accidents. We also found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements and had taken action to put this right. The provider was not always keeping a written record for accidents they perceived as a 'tumble'. Some parents did not feel they were informed about accidents. The provider has made changes and all accidents, even if perceived as minor, are now being recorded at the time they happen. These written records are shared with parents who sign to indicate they have been informed.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The risk assessment for climbing equipment had identified the risks and mitigations but had not been correctly implemented. The provider has changed their staff deployment and changed rules around the number of children who can use the equipment at any one time, to comply with the risk assessment already in place.
p.1
Summary of outcome
There was also a breach in confidentiality. Staff have received refresher training about the provider's expectations around the confidentiality of information staff obtain as part of their work role. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. We are satisfied with the action taken. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements. We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion