Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 23 Apr 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ruth Dollner (lead), Sophie Welch

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ruth Dollner, Sophie Welch

  • Postcode verified

    DL5 7LF

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+14Mostly positivemore positive than 32% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveconfidenttimelyclear
Criticismlimitedmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings842w+14
  • What needs to improve153w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
979
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

David Priestley Executive Headteacher Greenfield Community College Greenfield Way Newton Aycliffe County Durham DL5 7LF

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Greenfield Community College

Following my remote inspection with Ruth Dollner, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 2 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Greenfield Community College

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Greenfield Community College

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Greenfield Community College

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in September 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Greenfield Community College

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 consolidate work on the curriculum and monitor the impact of this across all subjects

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that the planned work to develop extra support for reading meets the specific needs of pupils.

p.2

Context

 Since the previous inspection, a new chair of governors, one new deputy headteacher and five new subject leaders have been appointed.

p.2

Context

 During the autumn term 2020, most pupils experienced periods of remote education because of COVID-19. This happened on two separate occasions for Year 7 pupils.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, the majority of pupils were being educated at home. About three quarters of all vulnerable pupils were attending on site. Around half of the pupils with an education, health and care (EHC) plan were in school.

p.2

Main findings

 In the current circumstances, pupils follow their usual timetables through live lessons, and their uptake of this provision is tracked. Leaders follow up with those pupils who are not attending as much as they should. Teachers have received training on how to use the school’s online learning platform, for example, in the use of ‘break-out’ rooms to help support the needs of individual pupils.

p.2

Main findings

 The school has made use of external support to develop planning in different subjects. This has included making audits of foundation subject plans in relation to national curriculum requirements. The local authority has supported this work. Teachers continue to plan collaboratively. They have found this helpful. Leaders believe they are delivering the full depth and breadth needed in each subject. However, work to develop the curriculum has slowed down due to the pandemic. More time is needed for leaders to implement and evaluate the impact of changes they have made to the organisation of different subjects.

p.2

Main findings

 During the pandemic, some changes have been made to the existing curriculum because of restrictions brought about by remote learning. For example, Year 8 textiles lessons have deferred practical assignments until pupils return to school. Leaders updated curriculum plans at the start of this academic year to account for missed learning. They have identified key knowledge that pupils may not have learned. This will be prioritised when pupils return.  All pupils complete the same work, either at school or remotely. Those on site, including vulnerable pupils, are provided with additional help from support staff. If pupils are not accessing lessons remotely, leaders invite them to come into school. Teachers are using a range of strategies to provide pupils with timely feedback.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders shared plans to improve the provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) during the inspection. As part of these plans, leaders allocated time for staff training and development. Some of this training has been able to continue in the current circumstances. Leaders have ensured that pupils with SEND receive individual support linked to their needs. Teachers make use of teaching assistants in the delivery of remote lessons.

p.3

Main findings

 Work to develop pupils’ reading is at an early stage. Leaders are currently selecting the pupils who will benefit from additional support. Accelerating this work is a priority for school leaders. Pupils in Year 11 are continuing with their normal curriculum, as timetabled, including receiving careers information, advice and guidance.

p.3

Main findings

 The school is receiving support from the local authority. This includes half termly visits and close monitoring. Leaders are working with a partner school, which has helped to inform their strategic planning. The local authority adviser is positive about the school’s engagement with this guidance.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors and the local authority have supported leaders in streamlining the advice and guidance that they have received. This has helped the school to focus on one set of priorities. Governors are confident speaking about the current provision. They are clear about how they hold leaders to account and are aware of the school’s priorities, both current and in the longer term.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, curriculum leaders, teachers, a representative of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We also looked at examples of the work uploaded for pupils. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 113 free-text responses, and 68 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Durham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion