Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Apr 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Chris Davies (lead), Tim Jenner

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Chris Davies, Tim Jenner

  • Postcode verified

    WF4 1NF

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+3Mixedmore positive than 34% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisecleareffectivewell supportedpositive
Criticismconcernlimitedstrugglegaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings810w+13
  • What needs to improve136w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
931
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 8
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Peter Walker Headteacher Crofton Academy High Street Crofton Wakefield West Yorkshire WF4 1NF

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Crofton Academy

Following my remote inspection with Chris Davies, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 4 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Crofton Academy

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Crofton Academy

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Crofton Academy

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in September 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Crofton Academy

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances.

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 check that support for pupils who struggle to read fluently helps them to improve quickly.

p.2

Context

 Since the previous inspection, one deputy headteacher has left the school. You have appointed two new assistant headteachers and a new school business manager. In May 2020, the school joined Castleford Academy Trust.

p.2

Context

 Across the autumn term 2020, just over half of pupils were taught remotely on at least one occasion.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, a small proportion of pupils were attending the school site, including the school’s on-site resource base for visually impaired pupils. This includes around a fifth of pupils identified as vulnerable and a third of pupils with an education, health and care plan.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have a clear plan for ensuring pupils access education either remotely or on site. They have provided effective training and support for staff to teach remotely. Leaders monitor the attendance and participation of pupils in remote education, which have increased across this term.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have adapted subject content to prioritise topics that can be taught remotely. For example, in mathematics and history, leaders have changed the order of some parts of topics. Content which has not been taught this term will be taught when pupils return to school. The academy’s wider focus on identifying clear ‘steps’ in learning has supported these decisions.

p.2

Main findings

 Pupils who are learning on site are taught the same curriculum as those learning remotely. Pupils on site are well supported by a range of staff. This includes senior leaders, pastoral leaders and learning support assistants. Pupils who are learning remotely can ask for extra help during live lessons or by contacting their teacher.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders maintain regular contact with vulnerable pupils who are not being educated on site. This is done through phone calls and home visits. The school provides ‘live’ tutor sessions and assemblies in order to support pupils’ well-being. The school is quick to act if there is a concern about a pupil’s well-being or safety.  Leaders continue to focus on pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). They have worked closely with families and found creative ways to support pupils remotely, for example by using voice recordings. Pupils with SEND who are learning on site are supported by their usual support staff.

p.2

Main findings

 The school has focused on developing the knowledge of Year 11 pupils. There are also plans to provide extra support to Year 11 pupils when they return to school. This includes additional classes for pupils who intend to study A-level science.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders have clear plans to develop pupils’ reading, although these plans have been disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Leaders know how important reading is to enable all pupils to do well in all subjects. Leaders intend to resume these plans as soon as possible, with a specific focus on the weakest readers and those with gaps in their learning.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors have regularly supported and challenged leaders’ approach to remote education. They have considered the attendance and participation of pupils, and the support for vulnerable pupils. Governors have also continued to support leaders in focusing on wider strategic priorities.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders, staff and governors are very positive about the support they receive from the multi-academy trust (MAT). The MAT has supported leaders in planning for remote education. The MAT has also supported wider school improvement by working closely with senior leaders. The school has also received MAT support for curriculum development in science and design technology.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, staff, the multi-academy trust chief executive officer and representatives of those responsible for governance to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We also saw examples of remote education provided by the school. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 110 free-text responses, and 90 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Castleford Academy Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Wakefield. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion