Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
20 Apr 2021
- URN verified
EY254001
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- We also found that the provider had addressed the weaknesses in staff's knowledge and understanding of how to raise concerns about an adult's conduct and practice. p.1
- We found the provider had not met some of the requirements following the significant event and had taken action to put this right. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 1
- Words of findings
- 310
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills is leading Ofsted's work into how regulated early years and childcare providers in England have delivered child- centred practice and care within the context of the restrictions placed on society during the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic.
p.1
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 11th of January 2020, the provider notified us of a significant event which was likely to affect the suitability of a person in regular contact with children on the premises. Although the provider notified Ofsted, as required, they did not do so within the required timeframe.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 8 March, we carried out a regulatory telephone call to look into these concerns.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We found the provider had not met some of the requirements following the significant event and had taken action to put this right. We found that the provider had taken steps to improve the child protection arrangements at the setting by ensuring that the lead safeguarding officer in charge of the setting understood their roles and responsibilities. We also found that the provider had addressed the weaknesses in staff's knowledge and understanding of how to raise concerns about an adult's conduct and practice.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion