Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Apr 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Steve Varnam (lead), Damien Turrell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Damien Turrell, Steve Varnam

  • Postcode verified

    S21 4BE

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−11Mixedmore positive than 19% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveclear
Criticismweakerlimitedunclearnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings836w−36
  • What needs to improve214w+47

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,034
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%What needs to improve 20%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Sue Birch Headteacher Birk Hill Infant and Nursery School Chestnut Avenue Eckington Derbyshire S21 4BE

p.1

School

Following my remote inspection with Steve Varnam, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 2 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

School

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

School

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in November 2019.

p.1

School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 develop curriculum plans so that teachers can easily identify the knowledge they want pupils to learn and remember

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 widen the expertise of the governing body so that governors can more effectively hold leaders to account

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 improve communication with parents and carers so that they are clear about what their children are expected to learn across the curriculum.

p.2

Context

 There have been significant changes to leadership since the previous inspection. A key stage one leader and leader responsible for mathematics were appointed in September 2020. The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) joined the school in January 2020. Four governors have resigned. There are several vacancies on the governing body.

p.2

Context

 Very few pupils had to learn from home during the autumn term. No class ‘bubbles’ had to isolate.

p.2

Context

 Currently, around half of all pupils are working from home. Most pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and all vulnerable pupils attend on site.

p.2

Context

 There have been a small number of staffing absences due to COVID-19. Leaders have covered the absences with their own staff as well as with supply staff.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have taken the necessary actions to ensure that pupils, including those with SEND, receive education at this time. They have listened to the views of parents and carers to help improve the remote education on offer. However, a significant minority of parents report that they are unclear about what their children are expected to know and remember at this time.

p.2

Main findings

 Prior to the school partially closing on 23 March 2020, leaders responsible for English were receiving training arranged by the local English hub. They were using this training to improve the quality of the curriculum for reading and phonics. The approach to teaching phonics is more effective than it previously was. Pupils read books that help them to practise the sounds they have been learning. They read with increasing accuracy.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have started to improve the curriculum in most subjects. However, some plans do not yet set out the knowledge pupils should learn and when they should learn it. Not all teachers understand what subject knowledge they need to teach so that pupils know and remember more each year.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have trained staff so that the curriculum can be taught remotely. Teachers deliver some online lessons to check that pupils understand the work set. Teachers direct pupils to online materials to support the study of a wider range of subjects.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders ensure that vulnerable pupils receive more help at school and when working remotely. They provide pupils with electronic devices so they can join in with online learning. Teachers speak regularly with pupils and parents to check on the well-being of the whole family. Pupils who have fallen behind continue to receive support, particularly in reading. Pupils receive extra lessons in phonics as well as additional reading time with staff. However, some of this extra support for reading, has not been available to pupils working remotely.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders and teachers adapt the curriculum so that pupils with SEND continue to access the support they are used to. For example, in English, some pupils with SEND learn important vocabulary before the start of lessons. They use this knowledge to help them to understand the texts that they read during lessons. Teachers break information down into smaller steps for some pupils with SEND. Pupils know what is expected of them as they complete tasks at school and working remotely.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors are a committed team. They check that leaders continue to provide pupils with education at this time. However, due to recent resignations from the governing body, governors do not have enough expertise to hold leaders to account as well as they have done in the past.

p.3

Main findings

 The local authority provides support and challenge to help leaders address weaker areas of the curriculum. For example, it encourages links with the local English hub. Leaders use these links to help them improve the curriculum for reading. The local authority has plans to support the recruitment of new governors to help widen the expertise of the governing body.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, the SENCo, two senior leaders, two subject leaders, a member of the governing body and a representative of the local authority, to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We also checked a sample of lesson materials used for remote education and listened to pupils read in Years 1 and 2. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 17 free-text responses, and 13 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Derbyshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion