Social care · Social care monitoring visit
Children's Home run by Midas Manors Ltd in Bradford
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Midas Manors Ltd
- Inspection date verified
3 Mar 2021
- Inspectors verified
Jacqueline Malcolm
- Name on report verified
2573447
- URN verified
2573447
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Within 48 hours of the use of the measure, the registered person, or a person who is authorised by the registered person to do so (“the authorised person”)— p.4
- Specifically, ensure that a copy of the staff debrief is reflected in the physical intervention records. 31/03/2021 p.4
- The system referred to in paragraph (2) must provide for ascertaining and considering the opinions of children, their parents, placing authorities and staff. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 298
- shorter than usual (typical 566)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 46
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home - monitoring visit: 2573447 1
p.1
Midas Manors Ltd
Monitoring visit Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home is owned and operated by a private company and is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to two children who may have emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home and the manager have been registered with Ofsted since July 2020.
p.1
This monitoring visit
The purpose of this monitoring visit was to explore the children’s experiences, safety and welfare, because the home has not been inspected since it was registered in July 2020. Other aspects that were looked at during the visit relate to the admission and discharge of children at the home.
p.1
This monitoring visit
The visit included sampling documents and talking with one child, staff and relevant professionals. Due to the restrictions in place relating to COVID-19 (coronavirus), this monitoring visit was carried out off site. At the time of the visit, two teenage children were living at the home.
p.1
This monitoring visit
The manager and staff team have reflected on a very challenging period, which has resulted in some children leaving the home sooner than planned. Some staff have been physically assaulted. The manager has recognised and has acted on the times when they have not been able to keep everyone consistently safe due to the level of some children’s complex behaviours. The behaviour management guidance, diversion strategies and focused key-work sessions that the children have engaged in with staff did not lead to the desired progress. One of the contributing factors has been the lack of transparent information-sharing from the placing authority when one child was placed at the home. The manager has challenged this matter with the Inspection report for children’s home - monitoring visit: 2573447 2 placing authority. A meeting is planned between the provider and placing authority that intends to improve the admissions process.
p.1
This monitoring visit
Despite the challenges, the staff understand the children’s needs and risks and provide nurturing care to the children. Trusting relationships have been formed between the children and the staff team. A child remains in touch with the home since they left several weeks ago, which is testament to the positive relationships. One child has thrived significantly from their starting point. One social worker said, ‘The care afforded to [Name of the child] by the staff at [Name of the home] has been remarkable.’
p.2
This monitoring visit
Children can talk to the staff about any of their worries or concerns. The children’s involvement in their plans and decisions about the home encourages them to express their views and feelings openly.
p.2
This monitoring visit
Staff understand their role and responsibilities to safeguard children. The staff know how to whistle-blow about any unsafe practice. Children’s risk management plans support the staff to protect the children’s vulnerabilities. However, not all the risk assessments show the rationale for decreasing a child’s risk of sexual exploitation, and this is inconsistent with the child’s other related documentation. This is a recording issue that has posed no risk to the child’s safety and well-being. Children feel safe. One child rated their safety as ‘10 out of 10’.
p.2
This monitoring visit
The staff debriefs that take place after a physical intervention have not been included in the physical intervention records. The omission has not had an impact on children’s safety and welfare. When children have gone missing, the staff take effective action to help ensure that the children are found quickly. The good information-sharing from the police about any known risks in the community helps the manager to update the area risk assessment, and the staff remain vigilant.
p.2
This monitoring visit
Some children have continued to attend school during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, the fun and interesting activities that children have engaged in at the home have kept them occupied during lockdown. The dedication shown by two staff caring for one child during a period of self-isolation has enhanced the child’s experiences, provided some good memories and shown the child how much the staff care about them.
p.2
This monitoring visit
Appropriate scrutiny and challenge from the responsible individual promote continuous improvement. The views of children, staff, family and professionals have not been included in the quality of care review report. Some of the children’s electronic records are not secure. This could undermine the integrity and reliability of the information.
p.2
This monitoring visit
The manager has not consistently informed Ofsted of serious incidents that have led to the police being called to the home. Although no child has come to harm, the shortfall inhibits the regulator from having an oversight of safeguarding practices in the home. Inspection report for children’s home - monitoring visit: 2573447 3 The consistent and resilient staff team staff spoke highly about the children, and the management support and training. The staff are valued by the managers for their care and commitment to the children. One staff member said, ‘The support is 100% there.’ Professionals confirmed that the home communicates well with them. One professional said, ‘The home has been a fantastic steppingstone for [Name of the child] during a difficult period of time, and I hope to work with [Name of the registered manager] and her staff team again in the future!’
p.2
Recent inspection history
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
p.3
Recent inspection history
This is the home’s first inspection. Inspection report for children’s home - monitoring visit: 2573447 4
p.3
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.4
Requirement Due date
The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—
p.4
Requirement Due date
helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and
p.4
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—
p.4
Requirement Due date
use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(h))
p.4
Requirement Due date
review the risk assessments to ensure that the rationale for changing the risk rating is clear and consistent with the other relevant risk management documentation ensure that all children’s electronic records are maintained in a secure format. 31/03/2021
p.4
Requirement Due date
Within 48 hours of the use of the measure, the registered person, or a person who is authorised by the registered person to do so (“the authorised person”)—
p.4
Requirement Due date
has spoken to the user about the measure. (Regulation 35 (3)(b)(i))
p.4
Requirement Due date
Specifically, ensure that a copy of the staff debrief is reflected in the physical intervention records. 31/03/2021
p.4
Requirement Due date
The registered person must notify HMCI and each other relevant person without delay if— 31/03/2021 Inspection report for children’s home - monitoring visit: 2573447 5 an incident requiring police involvement occurs in relation to a child which the registered person considers to be serious. (Regulation 40 (4)(b))
p.4
Requirement Due date
The system referred to in paragraph (2) must provide for ascertaining and considering the opinions of children, their parents, placing authorities and staff. (Regulation 45 (5)) 31/03/2021
p.5
Information about this inspection
The purpose of this visit was to monitor the action taken and the progress made by the children’s home since its last Ofsted inspection.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000.
p.5
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: 10 Joseph Street, Holme Lane, Bradford BD4 0PT
p.5
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Alison Serefoglou
p.5
Inspector
Jacqueline Malcolm, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home - monitoring visit: 2573447 6 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion