Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Apr 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

James Duncan (lead), Steve Shaw

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    James Duncan, Steve Shaw

  • Postcode verified

    DN12 3JY

Page 2 of 3
Page 2 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+65Positivemore positive than 63% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery higheffectivestrongpositiveindependentclear
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings815w+60
  • What needs to improve172w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
976
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 17%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Anna Rooney Principal De Warenne Academy Gardens Lane Conisbrough Doncaster South Yorkshire DN12 3JY

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of De Warenne Academy

Following my remote inspection with James Duncan, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 10 and 11 February, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of De Warenne Academy

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of De Warenne Academy

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of De Warenne Academy

The inspection took place because the school has received three successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in May 2018.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of De Warenne Academy

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Context

 Since the previous inspection in May 2018, your senior leadership team of vice principals and assistant principals has completely changed. You have also recently appointed new senior leaders to take responsibility for literacy, relationships and sex education, e-learning and alternative provision. Since the previous inspection, the sixth form has closed.

p.2

Context

 At some point during the autumn term 2020, approximately 50% of pupils had to be educated remotely.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, approximately 5% of your pupils were being educated on site. Around 90% of your pupils who have education, health and care plans are attending on site. A very high proportion of your vulnerable pupils are attending on site, although the times when some of them attend varies across the week. Where this is the case, in the very large majority of instances, this is managed in partnership with appropriate external agencies such as the local authority’s children’s services.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders and those responsible for governance have put in place a remote learning curriculum which consists of regular ‘live’ lessons and lesson resources for independent study, which pupils access online. You have thought very carefully about how best to deliver your remote learning curriculum. Teachers are expected to follow your, and the trust’s, expectations for remote learning. Senior and subject leaders monitor the quality of what is being taught, and how.

p.2

Main findings

 To a very high degree, the remote learning curriculum is based on the curriculum which was in place at the start of the pandemic. Five-year plans in each subject were already in place. Leaders have had to make some adaptations to these plans in the current circumstances, such as moving science experiments to later in the year, or adapting aspects of technology practical work. Other than such amendments caused by COVID-19, pupils follow sequences of lessons where the content of what they learn is the same, and in the same order, as it was pre-pandemic.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders are taking effective action to provide education for vulnerable pupils and the children of key workers in school by ensuring that they access the ‘live’ lessons and other lesson resources. Pupils in school are supported in their work by learning support assistants. Leaders are continuing to support their weakest readers with a phonics-based scheme.

p.2

Main findings

 Pupils in Year 11 are following courses in the same qualifications which they started at the beginning of Year 10. Leaders have put extra one-to-one support in place for Year 11 pupils in the evenings and at weekends to help them to catch up on any lost learning caused by the pandemic.  Leaders’ plans to support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are founded on ensuring that pupils receive the same quality of support as they did pre-pandemic. For example, learning support assistants work with pupils with SEND in breakout rooms within the school’s digital learning environment. Leaders have already identified a detailed review of their SEND remote learning provision as a next step.

p.2

Main findings

 Those responsible for governance are supporting and holding leaders to account for the decisions which leaders are making. This is particularly the case for the remote learning curriculum, where governors have a clear understanding of what curriculum is being provided. As such, governors are taking effective actions to ensure that all pupils receive an education during the current circumstances.

p.3

Main findings

 School leaders are receiving strong support and challenge from the multi- academy trust to which the school belongs. For example, the trust has supported leaders in making sure that appropriate safeguarding processes are in place for remote learning, and in supporting subject leaders in making necessary adaptations to the remote learning curriculum. Staff who responded to the staff survey feel very positive about the school’s leadership.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, the delegate of the multi-academy trust’s chief executive officer, pupils, and representatives of those responsible for governance, to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We also reviewed examples of the school’s remote learning provision together with senior leaders. We discussed the school’s anti-bullying policy and practice. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, including 28 free-text responses, and 46 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Delta Academies Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Doncaster. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion