Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Damien Turrell (lead), Steve Varnam

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Damien Turrell, Steve Varnam

  • Postcode verified

    LE12 7ND

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−42Criticalmore positive than 8% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovingstrengthsaccuratekeensafe
Criticismweaknessesconcernsseriousat riskfall behindweakernot ambitiouslimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1142w−43
  • What needs to improve213w+13

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,337
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Troy Jenkinson Headteacher Highgate Community Primary School Heathcote Drive Sileby Loughborough Leicestershire LE12 7ND

p.1

Additional monitoring inspection of Highgate Community Primary School

Following my inspection with Damien Turrell, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 4 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional monitoring inspection of Highgate Community Primary School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to have serious weaknesses.

p.1

Additional monitoring inspection of Highgate Community Primary School

Inspectors visited the school site due to significant concerns about safeguarding raised at the previous inspection. The range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional monitoring inspection of Highgate Community Primary School

The inspection took place because the school was judged to have serious weaknesses at its previous section 5 inspection. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in September 2019.

p.1

Additional monitoring inspection of Highgate Community Primary School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 refine existing curriculum plans so that teachers can identify the knowledge that pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), need to learn so that they achieve well in the foundation subjects

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 raise the ambition of the phonics programme in the early years so that children are better prepared for the demands of reading in Year 1.

p.2

Context

 The early years leader joined the school in September 2020. The governing body appointed a new chair of governors in June 2020.

p.2

Context

 The school is due to become part of the Bradgate Education Partnership multi-academy trust on 1 April 2021.

p.2

Context

 A small number of pupils had to learn from home at some point during the autumn term 2020. Pupils in Year 2 had to do this more than others.

p.2

Context

 Currently, around half of all pupils are learning from home. Almost all pupils with SEND, or those who are vulnerable, are attending on site.

p.2

Context

 The deputy headteacher, key stage 1 leader and English leader are currently absent from work. These roles are covered temporarily by the headteacher and other staff.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders give careful thought to how pupils receive education in the current circumstances. They make sure that pupils learning from home get the same curriculum as those in school. They know which pupils need more support to do this. These pupils receive electronic devices and paper packs of resources. Staff contact pupils regularly to check that they understand the content taught. Parents and carers appreciate this help. A typical comment was that, ‘The school has gone above and beyond during this last lockdown.’

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have worked determinedly to develop the curriculum since the previous inspection. They have set out what they want pupils to know and remember in most subjects, starting from the early years. This work is further along in some subjects than in others. In some foundation subjects, leaders have not identified precisely enough the knowledge that pupils, including those with SEND, need to understand so that they achieve well.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders use research to improve the curriculum. For example, they train staff to understand how information is stored and remembered in pupils’ memory. Pupils at home and in school take part in ‘fab four’ and ‘super six’ quizzes so that teachers can check what pupils have remembered. Children in the early years get ‘pinny time’. On these occasions, staff dress in pinafores with letter cards in the pockets. They join in with children’s play, pulling out letter cards to check that children can remember the sounds that the letters make.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders act on feedback from parents to improve the remote education on offer. This has led to pupils now receiving more face-to-face time with teachers than they did during the first national lockdown. For example, staff deliver daily registration sessions and weekly assemblies online.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders and teachers adapt the curriculum so that all pupils can continue to learn, whether in school or at home. For example, teachers currently deliver more theoretical parts of practical subjects such as design and technology. Plans are in place to teach practical content when pupils return to school. In the early years, teachers encourage children to use everyday household items to learn. Children make ‘counting boxes’ filled with 20 items so they can practise counting. They go on hunts around the home to find different household objects, such as tins and boxes, that fit the description of the three-dimensional shapes they are learning about.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders are improving the reading curriculum. Most pupils read books that are well matched to the phonic knowledge they have. Pupils at home access electronic texts. Pupils who fall behind get extra help to catch up. However, the phonics programme in the early years is not ambitious enough. Some children leave the Reception Year without the knowledge they need to be fluent readers in Year 1.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders work hard to support vulnerable families. They check regularly how well families of these pupils are coping in the current circumstances. They offer vulnerable pupils places in school when learning at home becomes too difficult. Many of these pupils take part in forest activities. Staff use this time to improve pupils’ confidence, self-esteem and well-being.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders adapt the curriculum for pupils with SEND who are learning at home or at school. For example, staff teach these pupils important vocabulary before the start of lessons. Pupils use this knowledge to help them understand lesson content. Staff in ‘The Hub’ provide effective care and support for those pupils with the most complex needs.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors are committed to improving the school. They are reflective and keen to learn from mistakes made in the past. They work hard to check that leaders do the right things for all pupils. They receive a wide range of information from leaders and other stakeholders. They use this to deepen their understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses.

p.3

Main findings

 The local authority and the incoming trust provide valuable support to the school. Together, they have an accurate view of the school’s current performance. They give effective training to governors to improve their knowledge of safeguarding. They support leaders to develop weaker areas of the curriculum.

p.3

Main findings

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders have acted quickly to remedy weaknesses identified at the previous inspection. Staff receive comprehensive training. They know what to do when a pupil may be at risk of harm. Leaders respond to these concerns and make sure that pupils get the help they need. Leaders record the actions they take to keep pupils safe. These records are detailed and accurate. Pupils told us that, ‘If you are feeling upset or stuck, and your head is down, staff will come and help you.’

p.4

Evidence

We spoke to you, the assistant headteacher, the early years leader, the school business manager, the special educational needs coordinator, the deputy designated leads for safeguarding, two subject leaders, a small group of Years 5 and 6 pupils, three members of the governing body, a representative of the local authority and the chief executive officer of the Bradgate Education Partnership multi-academy trust to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.4

Evidence

We scrutinised a wide range of documents relating to safeguarding. We checked a sample of lesson materials used for remote education and listened to pupils in Years 1 to 3 read. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 41 free-text responses, and 17 staff questionnaires.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Leicestershire County Council. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion