Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Isabel Davis (lead), Damian Loneragan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Damian Loneragan, Isabel Davis

  • Postcode verified

    SG2 9XT

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−27Mixedmore positive than 12% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffective
Criticismdisruptionconcernslimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings883w−9
  • What needs to improve202w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,070
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 18%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Tony Fitzpatrick Executive Headteacher Barnwell School Shephall Green Stevenage Hertfordshire SG2 9XT

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Barnwell School

Following my remote inspection with Isabel Davis, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 23 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Barnwell School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Barnwell School

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Barnwell School

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in January 2018.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Barnwell School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 review the curriculum provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), using the information you have collected during this time of remote education.

p.2

Context

 Since the previous full inspection in January 2018, the leadership structure has changed. The headteacher is now the executive headteacher and one of the previous deputy headteachers is head of school. An assistant headteacher is currently the interim head of science.

p.2

Context

 In the first half of the autumn term 2020, very few pupils had to learn from home. By the second half of the same term, the school experienced greater disruption, with pupils isolating at home. During this period, the whole of Year 9 and Year 11 and some classes in Year 8 had to learn from home. In total, around 40% of pupils had to isolate at any one time.

p.2

Context

 Most pupils are learning from home, with approximately 10% of pupils on site. Around 25% of vulnerable pupils and 60% of pupils with education, health and care plans are being supported in school.

p.2

Main findings

 Following the previous inspection, leaders reviewed the curriculum for all subjects. Leaders were well placed to move to remote education during the national lockdowns. They continued to develop remote education during the autumn term of 2020 and spring term of 2021. Leaders are ensuring they provide an education to pupils learning in school or at home in the current circumstances.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have adapted how they teach each subject so pupils can access their learning remotely. Teachers increasingly deliver ‘live’ lessons that closely match pupils’ original timetables. Apart from physical education and the school’s ‘PRIDE’ programme, most pupils access the same subjects as they once did. Teachers check how well pupils are doing and provide guidance and feedback to help pupils understand what they are learning. Pupils told us that they value the discussions with their teachers. Pupils comment upon how the guidance teachers provide supports pupils to improve.

p.2

Main findings

 Teachers and leaders monitor pupils’ attendance and participation in remote education. Leaders have developed processes for quickly contacting parents should staff have concerns about a pupil and their learning. Regular contact with parents has helped leaders understand the challenges of their families at this time. Staff provide support at home where necessary. Some phone calls have resulted in leaders providing additional work packs or supporting pupils to return to school to work. Pupils, parents and staff say that leaders are looking after their well-being at this time.

p.2

Main findings

 In Year 11 and Year 13, leaders have matched the remote curriculum to the pupils’ usual experience in school. The curriculum supports reading to continue both in class and at home. Where possible, leaders have ensured that those in the sixth form continue to access other opportunities such as public-speaking opportunities and externally arranged leadership opportunities.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders have provided staff with appropriate training to deliver the school’s curriculum remotely. Staff feel they are supported well, and they value the opportunities leaders give them to share ideas to improve their remote teaching further.

p.3

Main findings

 For those working at school, and those learning at home, the content of the curriculum is mostly the same. Teachers and staff in school consider different ways to ensure the most vulnerable pupils receive the help they need. For example, leaders have supported the weakest readers with access to online reading resources and e-books.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders use what they know about pupils with SEND to help them access the curriculum. As a result, teachers work closely with learning support assistants to give pupils with SEND the support they need. Pupils with SEND and their parents tell us that they appreciate the additional help that they have been given during the period of remote learning.

p.3

Main findings

 A small number of pupils with SEND are studying a smaller range of subjects than they would usually. This group of pupils are accessing a curriculum that focuses on developing their English, mathematics and science knowledge, with additional reading and other support tailored to their needs. Leaders and governors recognise this is a short-term solution and are making plans to help return these pupils to their usual curriculum when possible.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors are supporting leaders to take effective action. They ask leaders appropriate questions about how leaders are supporting pupils’ learning in the current circumstances. Governors consider staff and pupils’ well-being.

p.3

Main findings

 The local authority challenges and supports leaders to help them continually review the curriculum.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, pupils, staff, representatives of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown. We also reviewed minutes from previous governing body meetings. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 48 free-text responses, and 98 staff responses to Ofsted’s survey.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hertfordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion