Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Apr 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Hanna Miller (lead), Daniel Lambert

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Daniel Lambert, Hanna Miller

  • Postcode verified

    PO38 3HJ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−3Mixedmore positive than 23% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisecaringeffective
Criticismnot alwayslimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1004w−8
  • What needs to improve135w+13

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,127
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Mark Snow Interim Executive Headteacher Godshill Primary School School Road Godshill Ventnor Isle of Wight PO38 3HJ

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Godshill Primary School

Following my remote inspection with Hanna Miller, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 4 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Godshill Primary School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Godshill Primary School

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Godshill Primary School

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in September 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Godshill Primary School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that curriculum content is carefully chosen and sequenced in all subjects so that pupils possess the right building blocks for future learning.

p.2

Context

 Since the previous inspection, a new assistant headteacher and a business manager have joined the school. Two new members have joined the governing body.

p.2

Context

 A small proportion of pupils had to work at home during the autumn term 2020.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, four fifths of pupils were being educated at home. Two fifths of vulnerable pupils were attending school on site, as well as three fifths of pupils who have an education, health and care plan.

p.2

Main findings

 In January 2021, leaders quickly adapted to the national lockdown, drawing on their learning and experience from the last partial school closure. Leaders set up a virtual school and provided electronic equipment to families who needed it. The remote curriculum replicates the normal curriculum where possible, particularly in English and mathematics. Leaders have sensibly adapted some subjects, such as physical education, so that pupils can participate without specialist equipment. Pupils log in daily to complete their tasks and staff carefully track their attendance. If pupils do not complete their work or find tasks tricky, staff quickly get in touch, providing feedback and support to help pupils get back on track.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have identified which children of key workers and vulnerable pupils need to be in school and these pupils work in small groups with their teachers. Pupils in school follow the planned curriculum and benefit from the additional support and guidance that staff provide. The school’s focus on academic and well-being support for these pupils is carefully considered and helps them to make progress during a time of anxiety for many. This was reflected in the views of parents, one of whom told us, ‘As a keyworker, I have to say the school has done an amazing job caring for my children. I am so grateful for what they have done and continue to do.’ Leaders maintain close contact with vulnerable pupils who are at home to ensure their welfare and educational needs are met.

p.2

Main findings

 Up until March 2020, leaders were in the process of developing the whole- school curriculum. Training was helping to develop leaders’ subject knowledge, enabling them to make these improvements. This work has been disrupted by the events of the past year. As a result, some subjects are better planned and sequenced than others. For example, in science, the key content and vocabulary that pupils need to know has been carefully planned so staff can build pupils’ knowledge over time. Other subjects are at earlier stages of development and plans do not focus sufficiently on what pupils need to know and remember. Consequently, the series of lessons do not always build pupils’ knowledge systematically.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have ensured that younger pupils continue to learn and practise their phonics skills daily, both remotely and in school. Pupils learn new sounds using online videos, and then put their new knowledge to work by reading online books. Parents share video recordings to show what their children have learned to teachers who provide feedback to pupils and plan new learning based on this information. Older pupils read and discuss texts which are carefully selected to build pupils’ knowledge of literature and the wider curriculum.

p.3

Main findings

 Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) typically are attending school on site. These pupils benefit from receiving their planned support and therapies. The SEND coordinator maintains close contact with families who are working remotely to ensure that the work set is matched to pupils’ needs and that families have sufficient support to help their children complete this.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors have adapted their work to meet the evolving needs of the school. They have made good use of the local authority support and training to improve their knowledge and to gain an unbiased view of the school’s performance. This has enabled them to check that all pupils are receiving education and that the right pupils continue to attend school. Governors have redoubled their checks on the well-being of staff and pupils to ensure that provision is made to help everyone manage during this time of change.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders have made effective use of the support offered by the local authority. Staff have received useful training to improve their understanding of phonics and mathematics. This has led to improvements in staff’s subject knowledge across the school. Many teachers have attended leadership training, which is helping them to plan for, and begin to enact, improvements in the school.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, senior leaders and staff. We met with representatives of those responsible for governance and a representative of the local authority to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We examined the school’s curriculum plans and viewed some samples of learning that is being provided remotely. We met with pupils who attend the school on site and listened to pupils read. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 34 free-text responses, and 17 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for the Isle of Wight. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion