Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
Jennifer Gibbs (lead), Susan Aykin
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Jennifer Gibbs, Susan Aykin
- Postcode verified
BA3 3NQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Since the previous inspection, you were appointed as the interim headteacher. p.2
- A new special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) and an assistant headteacher responsible for disadvantaged pupils were appointed. p.2
- In addition, a new chair of governors and two governors joined the governing body. p.2
- Approximately 20% of pupils, including one Year 9 class, accessed remote education last year. p.2
- At the time of this inspection, around 90% of pupils were learning from home. p.2
- Approximately 50% of pupils with education, care and health plans, alongside 10% of vulnerable and key-worker pupils, were attending school. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 995
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alun Williams Headteacher Writhlington School Knobsbury Lane Writhlington Radstock Somerset BA3 3NQ
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Writhlington School
Following my remote inspection with Jennifer Gibbs, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 2 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Writhlington School
This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Writhlington School
This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Writhlington School
The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in June 2019.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Writhlington School
Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
implement an effective literacy programme in every subject area so that pupils can read and write about these subjects successfully.
p.2
Context
Since the previous inspection, you were appointed as the interim headteacher. A new special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) and an assistant headteacher responsible for disadvantaged pupils were appointed. In addition, a new chair of governors and two governors joined the governing body.
p.2
Context
Approximately 20% of pupils, including one Year 9 class, accessed remote education last year.
p.2
Context
At the time of this inspection, around 90% of pupils were learning from home. Approximately 50% of pupils with education, care and health plans, alongside 10% of vulnerable and key-worker pupils, were attending school.
p.2
Main findings
You have worked hard to make sure that all pupils access education in the current circumstances. You and your staff have planned the curriculum well so that pupils can access it regardless of where they are learning. Where necessary, you have changed the sequence of learning in some subjects to meet the challenges posed by remote learning. For example, you rightly changed the sequence of lessons in chemistry to enable pupils to conduct experiments at school.
p.2
Main findings
You and your leadership team have designed a curriculum across the range of subjects that builds pupils’ knowledge and skills from key stage 3 to key stage 5. Despite this, you have identified that weaker literacy skills for some pupils remain a barrier to accessing the curriculum successfully. Although you have introduced new approaches to reading, your plans to improve the teaching and learning of literacy across the curriculum have not progressed as rapidly.
p.2
Main findings
You have made sure that pupils are assessed routinely both at home and at school. This has enabled staff to tackle gaps in pupils’ knowledge as they teach the curriculum. Year 11 pupils are currently revising their learning across different subjects. This approach ensures that pupils are secure in their knowledge and skills before they move on to the next stage in their education.
p.2
Main findings
Vulnerable pupils and key-worker children who study at school follow the same curriculum as those studying remotely. Pupils receive additional support if they find lessons difficult. Across the curriculum, pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities receive support and resources to help them learn well. For example, the use of videos to teach lessons across the curriculum is helping pupils to study at their own pace and secure their understanding before moving on to new topics.
p.2
Main findings
You have established effective monitoring systems to check pupils’ learning whether they are studying in school or at home. Most pupils engage well regardless of how they access education. Leaders know which pupils are not learning well and act swiftly to resolve the issue through additional support.
p.3
Main findings
You have adapted the personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education curriculum to meet the needs of all pupils. For example, you have prioritised the teaching of healthy eating as you have identified issues among pupils during the pandemic. You have rightly focused on training for staff to improve the quality of teaching and learning in PSHE, while identifying that more time is required for the PSHE curriculum to be implemented successfully.
p.3
Main findings
The trust plays an important role in helping the school to improve the quality of education. The mathematics curriculum is a strong example of the impact of the trust’s support. Developed through collaboration with other schools, it is well sequenced, enabling pupils to develop strong mathematical knowledge and skills. A range of helpful resources and routine assessment support pupils to practise what they have learned and prepare them for the next stage in their education.
p.3
Main findings
Governors bring a range of expertise to their roles. They understand the school’s priorities and the work leaders are doing. They gather a range of evidence to monitor the impact of leaders’ actions and hold them to account.
p.3
Evidence
This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, four governors, including the chair of the governing body, the SENCo and a number of subject leaders to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.
p.3
Evidence
We also spoke to two groups of pupils, looked at examples of pupils’ work and looked at examples of remote lessons. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 59 free-text responses, and 73 staff questionnaires.
p.3
Evidence
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body and the chief executive officer of Midsomer Norton Schools Partnership multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Bath and North East Somerset. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion