Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Apr 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Alyson Middlemass (lead), Michael Pennington

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alyson Middlemass, Michael Pennington

  • Postcode verified

    WA7 5YH

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+17Mostly positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyconfidentlyattentiveclear
Criticismlimitedmissednot effectivelynot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings995w+8
  • What needs to improve240w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,218
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 19%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

James Forber Interim Headteacher St Chads Catholic and Church of England High School Grangeway Runcorn Cheshire WA7 5YH

p.1

of England High School

Following my remote inspection with Alyson Middlemass, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 4 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

of England High School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require special measures.

p.1

of England High School

This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

of England High School

The inspection took place because the school was judged to require special measures. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in November 2019.

p.1

of England High School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 strengthen curriculum plans so that teachers are better informed about the knowledge that pupils need to know and remember

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 develop staff expertise so that they can adapt subject curriculums to meet the individual needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND)

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 strengthen teachers’ abilities to support pupils’ reading more effectively across subjects.

p.2

Context

 An interim executive board (IEB) was formed in May 2020. The previous headteacher left the school in August 2020. An interim executive headteacher took up post between June 2020 and December 2020. You were appointed as interim headteacher in January 2021. A special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) joined the school in November 2020 and an assistant SENCo took up post in January 2021. Since the last inspection, 19 teachers have left the school and one has joined.

p.2

Context

 In the autumn term, nearly all pupils have worked from home for a short period of time on at least one occasion. This has affected pupils in Years 8 and 9 more than other year groups.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, a small proportion of pupils are attending school. This includes about one fifth of pupils with SEND and about one fifth of all vulnerable pupils. All other pupils are being educated remotely.

p.2

Main findings

 The formation of the IEB has added impetus to leaders’ actions to improve leadership and the curriculum. Their work, alongside the support from the local authority, has ensured that leadership and curriculum development have continued throughout the pandemic. As a result, pupils have continued with their education throughout the current challenging times.

p.2

Main findings

 Improvements to the curriculum mean that it is now suitably broad. However, curriculum plans do not support teachers with enough detail about the knowledge that pupils should know and remember. Subject leaders are beginning to address this, but this work is still in its infancy.

p.2

Main findings

 Pupils benefit from a remote education offer that reflects the breadth of the new curriculum. Staff use the online systems well to check on pupils’ learning. Gradually, teachers are providing pupils with more useful feedback so that pupils can build on their learning. This is helping to ensure that pupils are increasingly engaged in an appropriate education at this time.  The SENCo has begun to improve the systems to support pupils with SEND. Leaders are strengthening support plans so that they include better information about the needs of these pupils than they did in the past. Even so, teachers are at different stages of using this information confidently and competently to adapt subject curriculums to meet the individual needs of pupils with SEND. Nonetheless, leaders have ensured that these pupils are duly supported during the current challenging circumstances. Teachers are helping pupils with some of their learning needs when they are working from

p.2

Main findings

home. Teaching assistants use online systems effectively to support groups of pupils with SEND. Leaders work well with other agencies to provide these pupils with the additional support that they usually receive.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders ensure that vulnerable pupils in school and those working remotely are able to access their education. Staff provide helpful support for vulnerable pupils who are attending school. Pupils said that they value the opportunities they get to work in smaller groups. Staff are appropriately attentive to the needs of vulnerable pupils who are working from home. They support these pupils regularly with helpful discussions about their learning and welfare.

p.3

Main findings

 Pupils in Year 11 largely follow their usual curriculum. However, leaders are mindful that these pupils have missed some learning which could not be delivered effectively under the current circumstances. You have suitable plans to make up for lost learning when the school reopens to all pupils. Staff provide helpful careers information, advice and guidance to pupils in Year 11 through a range of remote activities.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders established a clear picture of pupils’ reading abilities in the autumn term. Staff provided a range of appropriate opportunities to assist pupils who needed support with their reading. Some aspects of this support have not been able to continue while pupils are educated remotely. Furthermore, subject teachers do not have a clear enough understanding of what they can do to further support pupils’ reading.

p.3

Main findings

 Members of the IEB have brought vital expertise and leadership capacity to the school. They have taken appropriate actions to ensure that new leadership and curriculum structures better meet the needs of the school. The IEB challenges and supports leaders well. This group rigorously evaluates the impact of leaders’ actions. Throughout the pandemic, its members have established a deep understanding of the challenges that leaders have faced, and continue to face, in the current circumstances.

p.3

Main findings

 The local authority has provided additional leadership capacity. This has significantly strengthened senior leadership and the leadership of the curriculum and SEND over the last year. Support from a local multi-academy trust has provided helpful guidance for subject leaders in their ongoing work to review and improve the curriculum.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We held meetings with you and other senior leaders to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown. We spoke with members of the IEB and representatives of the local authority. We also met with representatives from each diocese.

p.4

Evidence

We spoke with groups of middle leaders, teachers and pupils. We also evaluated some of the work that pupils have completed in recent weeks.

p.4

Evidence

We examined curriculum plans and records of the meetings of the IEB. We considered 30 responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire for staff. We also took account of the 38 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, including the comments received via Ofsted’s free-text facility.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the interim executive board, the director of education for the Diocese of Shrewsbury, the director of education for the Diocese of Chester, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Halton. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion