Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
Sarah McGinnis (lead), Lydia Pride
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Lydia Pride, Sarah McGinnis
- Postcode verified
TA4 4SW
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Since the previous inspection, new chairs have been appointed to the trust board and also to the local governing body. p.2
- An additional group of middle leaders have been appointed to monitor the quality of education in the school. p.2
- Across the autumn term 2020, approximately 20% of pupils had to be educated remotely for short periods of time. p.2
- At the time of the inspection, around 80% of pupils were being educated remotely. p.2
- Of the vulnerable pupils, 20% attend on site, including 60% of pupils with education, health and care plans. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance15
“Leaders of all subjects have a strong grasp of the skills pupils should develop.” p.2Reading & phonics8
“Pupils enjoy access to online books while they learn from home.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,010
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Daniel Hartley Headteacher Danesfield Church of England Middle School North Road Williford Taunton Somerset TA4 4SW
p.1
Middle School
Following my remote inspection with Sarah McGinnis, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 2 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.
p.1
Middle School
This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.
p.1
Middle School
Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.
p.1
Middle School
The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in May 2019. Ofsted
p.1
Middle School
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
to provide education in the current circumstances.
p.2
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:
p.2
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
ensure the school’s curriculum is sequenced effectively so that pupils know more and remember more.
p.2
Context
Since the previous inspection, new chairs have been appointed to the trust board and also to the local governing body. An additional group of middle leaders have been appointed to monitor the quality of education in the school.
p.2
Context
Across the autumn term 2020, approximately 20% of pupils had to be educated remotely for short periods of time.
p.2
Context
At the time of the inspection, around 80% of pupils were being educated remotely. Of the vulnerable pupils, 20% attend on site, including 60% of pupils with education, health and care plans.
p.2
Main findings
With the support of the multi-academy trust, you have made sure that pupils learn effectively from home. Your staff work tenaciously to ensure that pupils have working devices. Parents say that pupils benefit from more face-to-face time with their teachers. When pupils log in each day, they are greeted by their tutors. They attend live lessons across the week. As a result, pupils feel connected to the school and motivated towards their learning.
p.2
Main findings
You monitor the engagement of all pupils in remote learning carefully. When pupils do not participate, you act swiftly. Staff carry out home visits. If necessary, they encourage pupils to attend in person. Pupils working on site access their live lessons in the same way as if they were at home. Staff are on hand to provide any guidance they may need.
p.2
Main findings
Since the previous inspection, you have strengthened the leadership of the curriculum. Leaders have started to design a curriculum for Years 5 to 8. This builds on their first school learning and towards the local college curriculum. Links between subjects are being made. This work is further advanced in English and mathematics than in the wider curriculum.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders of all subjects have a strong grasp of the skills pupils should develop. However, in some subject areas, leaders do not have experience of setting out a sequence of knowledge for pupils to learn. Individual teachers decide what to emphasise. Curriculum plans do not make clear what all pupils must learn. Consequently, pupils do not remember the important curriculum content well enough.
p.2
Main findings
You send a clear message to pupils about the importance of reading. Pupils are encouraged to keep electronic reading diaries. Pupils enjoy access to online books while they learn from home. This is especially useful for pupils who do not have many books of their own.
p.3
Main findings
A programme of phonics teaching for pupils in the early stages of learning to read is in place. Pupils who attend school in person have continued to learn phonics. However, pupils who learn from home have not benefited from this phonics development.
p.3
Main findings
Leaders provide effective support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Staff know the pupils well and understand their needs. For pupils learning from home, teachers offer a special online classroom. They present the most important content in smaller chunks, which helps pupils with SEND to remember more of the curriculum. When pupils with SEND attend in person, specialist staff support them well.
p.3
Main findings
The trust has sought feedback from pupils and parents on the remote learning offer. This has been used to improve the provision. Trust leaders invested in laptops for pupils. They are considering how to make the technology a routine feature of pupils’ education.
p.3
Main findings
Trust leaders increased the number of leaders in the school following the previous inspection. As a result, leaders monitor more closely how the curriculum works in practice. The local governing body provides effective support and challenge to subject leaders, which they welcome. Subject leaders receive useful support from local literacy and mathematics hubs.
p.3
Evidence
This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, the multi-academy trust chief executive officer and members of the local governing body to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.
p.3
Evidence
We held meetings with middle leaders, including the SEND manager, and groups of teachers. We met with a small group of pupils to discuss their experiences of education in the current circumstances. We scrutinised curriculum plans and samples of pupils’ work. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 29 free-text responses, and 26 staff questionnaires.
p.3
Evidence
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the West Somerset Academies multi-academy trust, the director of education for the Diocese of Bath and Wells, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Somerset. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion