Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jo Evans (lead), Martin Pye

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jo Evans, Martin Pye

  • Postcode verified

    B98 0LH

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+59Positivemore positive than 57% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongrobustrigorousimprovingpositiveeffective
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings971w+55
  • What needs to improve178w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,133
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Sarah Allen Interim Headteacher Roman Way First School Colts Lane Winyates West Redditch Worcestershire B98 0LH

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Roman Way First School

Following my remote inspection with Jo Evans, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 4 March 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Roman Way First School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require special measures.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Roman Way First School

This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Roman Way First School

The inspection took place because the school was judged to require special measures at its previous section 5 inspection. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in December 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Roman Way First School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 strengthen leadership capacity across the school, building more robust subject leadership

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 improve assessment systems so that pupils’ new learning builds securely on what they already know and remember.

p.2

Context

 Since the previous inspection, there have been many changes. The previous headteacher and an assistant headteacher have left. An interim headteacher has been appointed. The governing body has recruited new members and there is a new chair of governors. The school is due to become an academy in the near future.

p.2

Context

 During autumn 2020, about two thirds of pupils received remote education at some point in the term. Pupils in Year 4 were affected by this more than others.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, around two fifths of pupils were being educated in school. Almost all pupils identified as being vulnerable and all of those with an education, health and care plan were attending school.

p.2

Main findings

 Since the previous inspection, there has been an increasingly rigorous approach to school improvement processes. Leaders have changed curriculum planning in all subjects, and expectations are rising. Even so, leaders and staff know that further improvements to curriculum design and more staff training are needed. Throughout the past year, leaders have remained focused on these key improvement areas. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the pace of change.

p.2

Main findings

 Currently, pupils learning in school and at home are doing all their usual subjects. However, learning in English, mathematics and science has been prioritised. In these subjects, staff have identified the key knowledge that pupils need to know and have established routines for pupils to revisit crucial content. Other subjects, such as languages, music and physical education, still happen, but activities are different from usual. In the main, this is to make them more manageable at home.

p.2

Main findings

 The school uses an online platform to provide most remote learning. Teachers post work online every day. Pupils then do the work at a time to suit them and upload it so teachers can check it. Pupils in school follow a stricter timetable, and their lessons happen at set times. Whether at home or in school, lessons and activities are informed by the same curriculum plans and cover the same content. Pupils say that everyone gets frequent feedback about their work. Once a week, classes come together online for a joint activity, so pupils can see and talk with their friends.

p.2

Main findings

 If a pupil working at home does not upload work, staff contact them to check that all is okay. On top of this, staff make routine telephone calls home. They also keep in contact with any agencies working with families to make sure that the right support is in place.

p.3

Main findings

 Whether at home or in school, pupils take part in phonics lessons and read every day. Pupils at home can access reading material online and parents can collect books from school. Throughout lockdown, the school has placed a strong emphasis on reading for pleasure and enjoying books.

p.3

Main findings

 In all subjects, leaders are working on improving curriculum planning and whole-school practice. Some subjects, such as mathematics, are further ahead than others, but in all subjects, there is scope to strengthen leadership further and improve assessment. Staff know that it is hard to gauge how much pupils working at home have actually done for themselves. Making sure that assessment checks the right things is an important priority, and particularly so when pupils return to school after 8 March 2021.

p.3

Main findings

 The provision of remote education has been a catalyst for improving communication with families. The school has provided plenty of information for parents to help with home learning. In addition, the school has provided laptops and technical advice. In their free-text responses to Ofsted’s survey, parents expressed very positive views. Their written comments praised the school’s actions to support children, academically and emotionally, during lockdown. Staff, too, feel supported at work.

p.3

Main findings

 Currently, about half of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are in school. In all cases, school staff tailor work to pupils’ particular needs and keep in close contact with home. As already noted, assessment of how well these pupils are doing could be better.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors understand their role and receive regular reports about the school’s actions to provide education at this time. They ask the right questions and have established routines for checking on the quality of the school’s work.

p.3

Main findings

 External support has focused on building leadership capacity in the school. The local authority and staff from two multi-academy trusts have provided effective advice and training to help with this. In addition, there has been a review of the school’s governance and SEND provision. All of these actions are bringing more challenge and support to all aspects of the school’s work.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, the chief executive officer of Endeavour Multi-Academy Trust, teaching staff, pupils, the chair and a parent governor to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.4

Evidence

We also looked at information on the school’s website, curriculum plans and remote education resources. We observed a reading session. We considered responses to our online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, including 28 free-text responses, and 15 staff questionnaires.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Worcestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion