Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 29 Mar 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Heather Barraclough (lead), Nathan Kemp

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Heather Barraclough, Nathan Kemp

  • Postcode verified

    TQ3 3XA

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiserichhigh-qualityaccurate
Criticismlimitedabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings895w+49
  • What needs to improve162w−20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,042
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Jessica Humphrey Executive Headteacher Kings Ash Academy Pimm Road Paignton Devon TQ3 3XA

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Kings Ash Academy

Following my remote inspection with Heather Barraclough, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 25 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Kings Ash Academy

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Kings Ash Academy

This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Kings Ash Academy

The inspection took place because the school has received three successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in March 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Kings Ash Academy

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Context

 There have been no significant changes to staffing or leadership since the previous inspection. The school remains part of Bay Education Trust.

p.2

Context

 In the autumn term 2020, there were no confirmed cases of COVID-19. However, approximately 40% of pupils were educated remotely at some time. The average period of absence for these pupils was 2 to 3 days. No ‘bubbles’, classes or year groups were closed.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, approximately 40% of pupils were attending school. This includes 63% of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), and 68% of vulnerable pupils. In addition, approximately 60% of pupils with an education, health and care plan were in school.

p.2

Context

 Two members of staff were shielding at home at the time of this inspection. However, they continue to contribute to the school’s offer of on-site and remote education.

p.2

Main findings

 Since the beginning of the third national lockdown, the proportion of vulnerable pupils and pupils with SEND attending school has increased. With the support of the multi-academy trust, you have worked hard to ensure that as many pupils as possible access education in the current circumstances. You have provided devices, internet data and paper copies of work for families that need them. As a result, most pupils regularly access and complete activities that staff provide.

p.2

Main findings

 You chose methods of remote education which parents, pupils and staff knew and understood. This made it easy to get off to a quick start when schools closed to all pupils. You remain adamant that despite national restrictions, it is very much ‘business as usual’. While it is impossible to teach everything you normally would, such as team sports in physical education, you continue to offer the school’s normal curriculum.

p.2

Main findings

 You have ensured that all pupils have access to a rich and varied curriculum experience that links to the school’s ‘Big ideas’. Staff provide daily English and mathematics lessons for all pupils. Pupils also learn science and in the foundation subjects, such as history, at different points of the week. In subjects such as music and French, pupils continue to receive specialist teaching. Staff go the extra mile to make sure pupils educated remotely do not miss out, delivering items such as reading books, sculpting clay and musical instruments to pupils’ homes.

p.2

Main findings

 Phonics and reading rightly remain a top priority for the school. You provide daily opportunities for pupils to develop their phonics knowledge, including in the early years. Teachers provide activities which match pupils’ knowledge. Staff provide support for pupils who need extra help to keep on track. Your analysis of assessment information suggests to you that pupils’ knowledge is close to where it would be normally at this time of year.

p.2

Main findings

 Teachers provide pupils with daily opportunities to read and listen to an adult read. This starts in the early years, where children listen to and recite nursery rhymes. You have carefully selected high-quality texts with increasing complexity, so pupils of all ages can access rich language and vocabulary. Fluent readers access books matched to their reading ability and are regularly assessed to test their understanding and readiness to tackle more complex texts.

p.3

Main findings

 You continue to support pupils with SEND, whether they are at home or in school. Teachers provide activities that help pupils make progress against their individual targets. You keep in touch with families, so parents know how to support their children. Pupils continue to access specialist support, including from the educational psychologist and speech and language specialists. As a result, pupils with SEND engage well with education.

p.3

Main findings

 The trust board supports you well. It keeps a watchful eye on how well pupils engage with remote education. An external consultant carries out visits to the school. Such visits are used by the trust board to assure themselves that the school continues to improve, even in the current circumstances.

p.3

Main findings

 You access useful support from the local teaching school. Your staff have benefited from teachers working together across a range of schools to compare their judgements of pupils’ work. This has helped your staff make accurate assessments of what pupils know, can do and understand. You have also accessed reading and mathematics support.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, curriculum leaders, pupils, a representative of the local teaching school and the chief executive officer of Bay Education Trust to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We listened to pupils read. We also looked at a sample of curriculum plans, activities provided for pupils and a sample of pupils’ work. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 13 free-text responses, and 54 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of Bay Education Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Torbay. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion