Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
Harry Ingham (lead), Catherine Old
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Catherine Old, Harry Ingham
- Postcode verified
SO18 5FW
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Since the previous section 5 inspection, the school has become part of Reach Cooperative Trust, which is made up of several Southampton schools. p.2
- All remain under local authority control. p.2
- The governing body has been reconstituted, with several new members having joined since September 2019. p.2
- A new deputy headteacher also joined the school in September 2019. p.2
- During the autumn term, approximately 10% of pupils had to be educated remotely for a short period of time. p.2
- No whole classes or year groups had to self-isolate. p.2
- At the time of this inspection, approximately 15% of pupils were being educated at school. p.2
- Approximately 25% of pupils who are vulnerable and 20% of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) were attending on site. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment5
“Pupils at home receive timely help and feedback from their teachers.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,158
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Jim Henderson Headteacher Woodlands Community College Minstead Avenue Southampton Hampshire SO18 5FW
p.1
College
Following my remote inspection with Harry Ingham, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 23 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.
p.1
College
This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.
p.1
College
This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.
p.1
College
The inspection took place because the school has received four successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in January 2019.
p.1
College
Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
strengthen the planning and sequencing of knowledge and skills in all subjects so that pupils deepen their understanding consistently well.
p.2
Context
Since the previous section 5 inspection, the school has become part of Reach Cooperative Trust, which is made up of several Southampton schools. All remain under local authority control. The governing body has been reconstituted, with several new members having joined since September 2019. A new deputy headteacher also joined the school in September 2019.
p.2
Context
During the autumn term, approximately 10% of pupils had to be educated remotely for a short period of time. No whole classes or year groups had to self-isolate.
p.2
Context
At the time of this inspection, approximately 15% of pupils were being educated at school. Approximately 25% of pupils who are vulnerable and 20% of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) were attending on site. This includes most of the pupils who have an education, health and care (EHC) plan.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders and governors are clearly determined to ensure that pupils continue to receive education in the current circumstances. They adapted their approach after governors’ consultation with parents and carers and pupils had identified the different preferences of pupils learning at home. For example, pupils are now able to access a variety of live and pre-recorded lessons, as well as paper-based work.
p.2
Main findings
Staff ensure that pupils learning at home have access to subject-specific resources. For example, pupils studying GCSE art have been provided with painting materials. Pupils at home receive timely help and feedback from their teachers. Leaders’ tracking of pupils’ engagement in learning from home shows that it has improved recently and is particularly high for pupils in Year 11.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers have adapted the curriculum to better meet the needs of pupils learning at home. Wisely, they have altered the order in which some topics are taught. For example, in personal, social and health education (PSHE), some more sensitive content will be taught when all pupils return to school. In physical education, additional lessons on well-being and fitness are being provided. Most pupils who are learning in school are given the same work as pupils at home. However, rightly, pupils with SEND and some vulnerable pupils receive additional support to better meet their needs. Since the previous inspection, leaders have prioritised improving the quality of the curriculum. Leaders’ decisions about what is the most important knowledge to be taught, and the best order in which to teach that knowledge, are further developed in some subjects than in others. For example, in science, plans show how key ideas are carefully sequenced so that pupils
p.2
Main findings
build on what they already know. However, in other subjects, such as English and physical education, it is not as clear what leaders want pupils to know by the end of their time in school.
p.3
Main findings
Developing the quality of provision for pupils with SEND is central to leaders’ ambition to improve the school. Although the circumstances of the pandemic have delayed some of the impact of their plans, leaders’ work to raise the profile of SEND is starting to be successful. Staff now all have access to information about pupils’ specific needs that they can use when planning how pupils will learn the curriculum. Staff have received training in how to adapt and structure activities to help pupils learn. Leaders’ monitoring of teaching and the curriculum now includes a specific focus on SEND.
p.3
Main findings
Leaders’ introduction of a nurture group in Year 7 has been well thought through. The curriculum followed by pupils in this class is carefully adapted to help them catch up with literacy. Progress has also been made in prioritising literacy across the school. For example, leaders have identified subject- specific vocabulary that pupils need to be taught. Leaders’ monitoring of the impact of various approaches in place to support the development of reading is in its early stages.
p.3
Main findings
Despite the challenges of the past year, leaders have made some improvements to how pupils’ behaviour is managed. Pupils told us that behaviour around the school was much better last term than previously.
p.3
Main findings
Before March 2020, leaders’ focus on improving pupils’ attendance led to a reduction in persistent absence. This work has stalled during the last year because of the challenges of the pandemic. Further reducing pupils’ absence remains leaders’ priority.
p.3
Main findings
Governors have an accurate understanding of the school’s priorities and what leaders are doing to address them. The carefully chosen external support they have commissioned provides an additional and useful means of holding leaders to account for the school’s development. In addition, the local authority provides support and training for leaders and staff. It has been particularly influential in supporting improvements in the curriculum and for the provision of pupils with SEND. School leaders are in the early stages of working with other schools within the trust to further develop this work.
p.3
Evidence
This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, five governors (including the chair of the governing body), three subject leaders, the special educational needs coordinator and assistant coordinator, a group of pupils, a group of staff and two representatives of the local authority to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.
p.4
Evidence
We also scrutinised some documentation relating to the work of governors. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 27 free- text responses, and 64 staff questionnaires.
p.4
Evidence
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Southampton. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion