Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Capital 4 Training Limited

Inspected 19 Feb 2021 · published 29 Mar 2021 · URN 1278614

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ken Merry

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    19 Feb 2021

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ken Merry

  • Postcode verified

    NE1 4XF

  • Name on report verified

    Capital 4 Training

  • URN verified

    1278614

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−57Criticalmore positive than 6% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectivesuccessfullyindependentsafesecure
Criticismtoo manytoo oftentoo fewconcernslimitedslowbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,164
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Capital 4 Training Progress monitoring report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Ken Merry, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address: 6 Charlotte Square Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4XF Monitoring visit: Capital 4 Training, 18–19 February 2021

p.1

Context and focus of visit

Capital 4 Training received a new provider monitoring visit in November 2018. At that time, inspectors made progress judgements under three themes.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

This monitoring visit focused on the extent to which leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action to provide education and training in the current circumstances. It was undertaken as outlined in the operational note on visits carried out from January 2021 and with reference to the further education and skills handbook.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

These visits are to help learners, parents, employers and government understand how providers are meeting the needs of learners in this period, including those with high needs and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, inspectors carried out this monitoring activity remotely. As a result, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would be the case during an on-site inspection. Therefore, this report provides a more limited level of assurance.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The impact of COVID-19 has been taken into account in the findings and progress judgement below. Inspectors did not evaluate leaders’ response to COVID-19 during the spring and summer of 2020, when the provider was not open to all learners and there were no national expectations regarding remote education.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Too many apprentices do not develop substantial new knowledge, skills and behaviours during their apprenticeship. At the beginning of programmes, trainers do not adequately assess what apprentices already know. As a result, they cannot identify what skills, knowledge and behaviours apprentices have gained since starting their apprenticeships. Too many highway maintenance apprentices have been in the same or similar job roles for many years. They receive certification through their apprenticeship for knowledge, skills and behaviours that they already had prior to starting the programme.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Apprentices on all programmes make slow progress. Over half of current apprentices are beyond their planned end date and many are still not ready for their end-point Monitoring visit: Capital 4 Training, 18–19 February 2021 assessment. Since the previous inspection, only a very small number of apprentices have successfully completed their apprenticeship.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Too few apprentices receive helpful careers advice before starting their programme. Too often, advice does not consider apprentices’ future career aspirations or their pre-existing knowledge and skills. As a result, too many apprentices start programmes without understanding fully the benefit of the apprenticeship to their work or future career.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Trainers do not monitor or review apprentices’ off-the-job training closely enough. For highway maintenance apprentices, too much of their off-the-job training requires them independently to research topics that they are already familiar with. Across all subject areas, apprentices include tasks in their off-the-job training logs that are part of their job roles and that they are already familiar with. For example, highway maintenance apprentices record that they take part in health and safety briefings, and leadership and management apprentices record that they interview new staff. This means that too many apprentices do not develop new knowledge and skills through their off-the-job training.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Trainers do not plan the curriculum well enough. Too often, the curriculum and assessment plans are generic and directly taken from the published apprenticeship standard without appropriate consideration of apprentices’ individual starting points. Trainers do not involve employers sufficiently in the planning of apprentices’ learning programmes. Employers rely on the knowledge of the trainer to lead the planning of the programme.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Highway maintenance apprentices achieve industry-recognised qualifications as part of their programme that are in addition to the requirements of their standards-based apprenticeship, such as awards in working in confined spaces and the safe use of abrasive wheels. As a result, they can complete more technical tasks at work. However, in too many instances, apprentices already have the existing knowledge and skills to achieve these qualifications.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Too often, apprentices do not benefit from helpful and constructive feedback on the quality of their work. In highway maintenance apprenticeships, the assessment evidence is mainly observations of apprentices at work, supported by photographs. Trainers do not record any feedback on the quality of apprentices’ practical work. In business management, when apprentices submit written work, trainers provide feedback that only occasionally identifies areas of further development. As a result, too few apprentices can demonstrate improvements in the quality of their work over time.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Staff continue to support apprentices well throughout the national COVID-19 restrictions. They make frequent telephone calls to apprentices to check on their well-being and mental health. Leaders recognise the potential risk that boredom during the ongoing restrictions could lead to an increase in the risk of apprentices being drawn into radicalisation and extremism. In response, leaders provide Monitoring visit: Capital 4 Training, 18–19 February 2021 apprentices with appropriate support materials to ensure that they are aware of the risks and how to avoid becoming radicalised.

p.3

Insufficient progress

The designated safeguarding office (DSO) uses his previous experience as a police officer working in child protection well to support apprentices and identify any possible concerns. The DSO has strong links with multi-agency support networks to draw on should apprentices have concerns that need external support.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.4

Insufficient progress

 identify the prior experience and qualifications of all potential apprentices to ensure that they can develop substantial new knowledge, skills, and behaviours as a direct result of their participation on programmes

p.4

Insufficient progress

 ensure that apprentices who are in learning beyond their planned end date make swifter progress and complete their apprenticeship as soon as possible

p.4

Insufficient progress

 review and improve the arrangements for apprentices’ off-the-job training to ensure that this element of their programmes helps apprentices to develop new knowledge and skills. Monitoring visit: Capital 4 Training, 18–19 February 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Insufficient progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Insufficient progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion