Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
25 Feb 2021
- Inspectorssingle source
Russ Henry
- Postcode verified
NG1 1NG
- Name on report verified
Nottingham College
- URN verified
130776
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 21
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 7 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Nottingham College Progress monitoring report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Russ Henry, Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.1
Type of provider: General further education college
p.1
Address:
Adams Building Stoney Street Nottingham Nottinghamshire NG1 1NG Monitoring visit: Nottingham College, 24–25 February 2021
p.1
Context and focus of visit
Nottingham College was last inspected in January 2020. At that time, inspectors judged the overall effectiveness of the provision to require improvement.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
This monitoring visit focused on the extent to which leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action to provide education and training in the current circumstances. It was undertaken as outlined in the operational note on visits carried out from January 2021 and with reference to the further education and skills handbook.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
These visits are to help learners, parents, employers and government understand how providers are meeting the needs of learners in this period, including those with high needs and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, inspectors carried out this monitoring activity remotely. As a result, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would be the case during an on-site inspection. Therefore, this report provides a more limited level of assurance.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
The impact of COVID-19 has been taken into account in the findings and progress judgement below. Inspectors did not evaluate leaders’ response to COVID-19 during the spring and summer of 2020, when the provider was not open to all learners and there were no national expectations regarding remote education.
p.2
Reasonable
Since the previous inspection, managers have worked with staff to improve curriculum planning. Many staff have developed new teaching schemes that extend beyond the requirements of qualifications and address the needs of employers and universities. However, this has not yet permeated all areas of the college and in a few subjects, teachers continue to focus their teaching only on what learners need to do to pass their assessments.
p.2
Reasonable
Managers have resolved many of the staffing challenges noted at the previous inspection. There are now sufficient specialist teachers for health and social care apprenticeships. Although there remain some challenges within engineering apprenticeships, new staff recruits have substantially improved the picture. Monitoring visit: Nottingham College, 24–25 February 2021 Learners’ attitudes to studying English and mathematics have improved. Teachers now contextualise these subjects effectively, relating them to learners’ main vocational areas or their daily lives, and this helps learners to understand the relevance of these subjects. Managers have promoted good attendance more assiduously and this has contributed to improvements in English and mathematics achievements.
p.2
Reasonable
Governors now pay more attention to the quality of education offered at the college. Two new governors have particular knowledge of the further education curriculum. A new quality and learning committee scrutinises curriculum matters before these are presented to the whole board.
p.3
Reasonable
At the start of current pandemic restrictions, teaching moved online. For the most part, learners and apprentices attend live online lessons that follow a very similar timetable to the previous classroom lessons. Staff record most lessons and learners find these recordings useful for revisiting topics and reinforcing their understanding.
p.3
Reasonable
Teachers have made appropriate adjustments to the curriculum to take into account the challenges of learning remotely. For example, teachers of mathematics identified that learners find it difficult to complete work on graphs at home and have reordered lessons so that this topic will be taught when learners return to studying in-person.
p.3
Reasonable
Most staff plan and teach online lessons effectively. They organise material appropriately, provide clear explanations of topics, and make appropriate use of visual aids to reinforce key points. However, a small number of teachers sequence lesson material poorly, provide unclear explanations, require learners to complete tasks before they are ready, and use visual aids that contain spelling, punctuation and grammar errors. This was particularly evident in business studies lessons.
p.3
Reasonable
Managers have provided staff with extensive training on assessment and feedback since the previous inspection, but this has not yet led to consistent improvements. Although most teachers use questioning effectively during online lessons to ensure that learners and apprentices have understood material, a minority do not. Some teachers rely too much on whole group questioning and this excludes a few learners. Others use activities that do not really assess learners against the stated learning objectives. Others do not provide enough opportunities for learners to recall and practise what they have studied earlier in their courses.
p.3
Reasonable
Teachers mark work thoroughly and accurately. Most provide feedback that is clear and identifies both strengths and areas for improvement. Learners and apprentices often find it helpful to refer to this feedback when producing subsequent pieces of work. However, a few teachers provide feedback that is too vague to be of much help to learners and apprentices or do not return work quickly enough.
p.3
Reasonable
Staff make frequent contact with learners and apprentices who are studying at home to enquire about their welfare. Most learners appreciate this. In addition, learners are able to access an array of additional support services, including an online Monitoring visit: Nottingham College, 24–25 February 2021 ‘wellness café’ that many find a useful resource for coping with stress and isolation. When learners disclose personal difficulties, staff refer them to achievement coaches or to external organisations that provide the help that they need. Apprentices are well supported in the workplace through a mentoring scheme.
p.3
Reasonable
Learners with education, health and care plans benefit from effective online reviews that involve college staff, learners, parents and representatives from external agencies. Staff ensure that learners with special educational needs and/or disabilities receive support while they are at home.
p.4
Reasonable
Managers have adapted the arrangements for careers advice so that learners and apprentices are able to access guidance remotely. Teachers continue to help learners to complete their university applications.
p.4
Reasonable
Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:
p.4
Reasonable
improve the quality of online teaching in weaker subjects ensure that all teaching staff understand the purposes of assessment and are able to deploy a range of approaches to testing learners’ knowledge and skills ensure that feedback on marked work is consistently good and provided in a timely manner. Monitoring visit: Nottingham College, 24–25 February 2021 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding
p.4
Reasonable
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Reasonable
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Reasonable
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Reasonable
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion