Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 29 Mar 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Aimee Floyd (lead), Yasmin Maskatiya

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Aimee Floyd, Yasmin Maskatiya

  • Postcode verified

    TN17 2PJ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−2Mixedmore positive than 23% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconfidenttimely
Criticismfalling behindlimitedabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings969w0
  • What needs to improve213w−7

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,167
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 18%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Nicola Taylor Executive Principal The High Weald Academy Angley Road Cranbrook Kent TN17 2PJ

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The High Weald Academy

Following my remote inspection with Aimee Floyd, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 23 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The High Weald Academy

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The High Weald Academy

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The High Weald Academy

The inspection took place because the school has received three successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in April 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The High Weald Academy

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 increase the number of pupils accessing the full remote education offer

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 ensure that all pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) receive the additional support for their learning that they need.

p.2

Context

 The interim executive headteacher and three assistant principals have left the school since the last inspection. In addition, there have been new appointments to the role of interim chief executive officer of the Brook Learning Trust as well as to the chair of the board of trustees.

p.2

Context

 All pupils were educated remotely for the last four days of the autumn term 2020. The school was forced to close at this time because of COVID-related staff absence. Year 10 were the most affected year group over the autumn term 2020 because this year group had two separate periods of working from home.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection almost all pupils were being educated remotely. A quarter of vulnerable pupils and a tenth of pupils with SEND were attending school.

p.2

Context

 Leaders were not dealing with any staff absences relating to COVID-19 at the time of the inspection.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders had prepared well for the move to provide remote education in January 2021. They had trained staff and pupils to use the new technology in the summer term 2020. The method of delivery was trialled with those pupils who had to self-isolate in the autumn term. Therefore, when the school partially closed in January, pupils were confident in their use of the remote learning offer. Leaders had also made sure that almost all pupils had access to the internet and appropriate devices at home. A very small number of pupils still rely on paper resources.

p.2

Main findings

 As well as preparing for remote learning delivery, leaders have carried out an overhaul of the curriculum. Since September 2020, the school has put in place a coherent plan across the school for what pupils learn and in what order in each subject. There is still more work to do to establish consistency and quality across all areas. Through their monitoring work, leaders are focusing on areas that still need to improve.

p.2

Main findings

 Teachers are offering five ‘live’ lessons daily to pupils learning at home. This mirrors the normal school day. The range of subjects taught is the same as when all pupils are on site. There have been some adaptations or reordering of the curriculum content, but these have been minor. Teachers make sure that pupils receive timely feedback about the work they complete.

p.2

Main findings

 The executive headteacher and the head of school are focused on checking the quality and quantity of work provided and tracking how well pupils take part in the remote learning. They know this is especially important as the vast majority of pupils are at home. Their monitoring has found that while nearly all pupils join in at the beginning of the day, a minority of pupils miss some lessons, particularly later in the afternoon. As a result, some pupils are falling behind. Leaders are now putting in place different approaches to increase pupils’ motivation. They are working hard to re-engage those pupils who are missing out.

p.3

Main findings

 All vulnerable pupils and pupils with SEND have a member of staff who regularly checks on their well-being and learning. The special educational needs and or/disabilities coordinator (SENCo) briefs staff every week in her ‘spotlight’ meetings about pupils with SEND and how to support their learning. Those pupils currently in school are benefiting from their usual additional support. Pupils with SEND learning from home are not, which is slowing learning for some.

p.3

Main findings

 Pupils in Year 11 are all learning remotely. Leaders’ systems for checking on their attendance and quality of work picked up that some pupils’ motivation had dropped off. As a result, teachers recently put on a virtual ‘learning conference’ for all Year 11. This helped refocus pupils on their career aspirations and their current study. The event was well attended and leaders have since seen increased pupil commitment to their learning.

p.3

Main findings

 Trustees have made sure that systems are in place to offer education to all pupils in this partial closure period. They are assuring themselves that leaders are making every effort to encourage pupils to participate. Trustees have regularly checked on the quality and range of work that is provided and have also followed up on the school’s processes for checking on absence.

p.3

Main findings

 The school has set up a sequence of training and development for staff that has focused well on the curriculum and its leadership. Collaborating with other schools in the trust on curriculum development has helped leaders bring about worthwhile improvements. Teachers have also benefited from being part of a larger professional community. In addition, the school has also taken up the offer to work with other academy trusts. The support from one trust has led to significant improvements to the mathematics curriculum.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you in your role as both executive headteacher and interim chief executive officer for the trust, other senior leaders, pupils, staff, and the chair of the board of trustees to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We also looked at examples of teaching materials and considered a range of documentation provided by the school. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, and 15 responses to the staff questionnaire.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Kent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion