Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Mar 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Aimee Floyd (lead), Janet Pearce

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Aimee Floyd, Janet Pearce

  • Postcode verified

    PO30 2DX

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+49Positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseambitiousstrongenjoywell-preparedpositivenurturingswiftlysensitive
Criticismtoo lowlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings979w+45
  • What needs to improve176w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,142
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Matthew Parr-Burman Executive Headteacher Medina College Fairlee Road Newport Isle of Wight PO30 2DX

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Medina College

Following my remote inspection with Aimee Floyd, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 24 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Medina College

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Medina College

This monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on- site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Medina College

The inspection took place because the school has received four successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in January 2020.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Medina College

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 (coronavirus) on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances.

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to: Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted  fully implement the school’s plans to promote reading, including:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

– establishing the school’s literacy policy across the curriculum

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

– making better use of the school library resources to help all pupils enjoy reading for pleasure

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

– ensuring that pupils at an early stage of reading get the specific help they need.

p.2

Context

 Since the section 5 inspection in January 2020, nine teachers have left the school and ten have been appointed. One governor has left the governing body and two have been appointed.

p.2

Context

 During the autumn term 2020, a very small number of individual pupils had to work from home.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, nearly all pupils were being educated at home, with a small group of pupils attending on site. Just under one quarter of the school’s vulnerable pupils and those with education, health and care plans were learning on site.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders and governors were well-prepared for the partial school closure in January 2021. They had sensibly taken advantage of the earlier lockdown to adapt their existing curriculum plans. Staff were trained thoroughly in the use of digital technology, and leaders made sure that pupils had the necessary equipment to access lessons when working from home. As a result, pupils have benefited from a relatively smooth continuation of their education.

p.2

Main findings

 At the time of the section 5 inspection in January 2020, senior and faculty leaders had made a positive start to developing a broader and more ambitious curriculum. Leaders have continued to review their plans, while responding swiftly to what assessment of pupils is telling them. Leaders and teachers are now at the stage of thinking more deeply about what they teach, when they teach it and how to ensure that pupils learn and remember more.

p.2

Main findings

 Until recently, the proportion of vulnerable pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) attending on site had been too low. Understandably, some families were alarmed at the rapid increase in the number of COVID-19 cases on the island and were hesitant about sending their children to school when the lockdown began. However, at the time of the inspection, leaders were taking a firm but sensitive line with reluctant attenders to get them ready for the school’s full reopening. Numbers of pupils working on site have increased.  Pupils attending on site follow the same curriculum as those learning at home. Although they can directly contact staff supervising their lessons, most pupils prefer to message their own teacher through the ‘chat’ facility. Pupils with SEND have extra support, whether they are at home or on site. As numbers on site have increased, staff have wisely planned more bespoke programmes

p.2

Main findings

to help integrate pupils back into school.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders’ plans to raise the profile of reading have slowed during the pandemic. Leaders want to improve the school’s library resources and guidance for pupils, particularly those in key stage 3. Plans are in place to promote reading across all subjects and ensure that struggling readers get the intensive help they need. School leaders agreed with inspectors that promoting reading and improving literacy are an urgent priority.

p.3

Main findings

 Staff and governors are acutely aware of how important it is to prepare Year 11 and Year 13 pupils for the next stage of their education. Staff have kept these pupils on track through maintaining study and assessment routines, nurturing their mental health and focusing on career plans.

p.3

Main findings

 Staff’s knowledge of pupils with SEND is matched by a strong sense of responsibility for their well-being. Many staff have clearly gone ‘above and beyond’ to work closely with particular families. Every pupil with an education, health and care plan benefits from regular, if not daily, contact with their dedicated teaching assistant on site and when working at home. Specialist support, such as speech and language therapy, has not stopped during the restrictions.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors know the school’s current priorities and have closely monitored what the school has provided since the start of the pandemic. Governors helpfully stepped up communication with senior and faculty leaders, listening and providing reassurance. Governors ask searching questions about remote and on-site education. They check that leaders know not only that pupils are accessing remote education, but also progressing through the curriculum.

p.3

Main findings

 The school benefits from collaborative work across the federation. Leaders’ and governors’ oversight of both secondary schools has sustained curriculum improvements and kept aspirations high. School leaders and teachers value the support provided by the local authority advisory team. A partnership with a mainland secondary school has led directly to improvements in science. The school improvement partner knows the school and federation well. She supports senior leaders’ drive and ambition and has continued to provide challenging insights during the pandemic and as the school looks to the future.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, senior leaders across the federation, governors and the local authority adviser to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown. We spoke to groups of pupils who were attending school on site.

p.4

Evidence

We also reviewed the updated school improvement plan, documentation related to the work of governors and your survey of staff and parents. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 45 free-text responses and 110 staff questionnaire returns.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the co-chairs of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for the Isle of Wight. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion