Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Susan Aykin (lead), Dale Burr

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Dale Burr, Susan Aykin

  • Postcode verified

    DT6 3TR

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+79Very positivemore positive than 80% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveconfidenthigh expectationswell-sequencedpositiveimprovingsecure
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings918w+77
  • What needs to improve176w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,080
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Sarah Terrey Headteacher St Catherine’s Roman Catholic School Pymore Road Bridport Dorset DT6 3TR

p.1

School

Following my remote inspection with Susan Aykin, Her Majesty's Inspector (HMI), of your school on 25 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted's published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

School

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

School

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in June 2019.

p.1

School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 improve the skills and expertise of new subject leaders to help them check how effectively pupils are learning the planned curriculum.

p.2

Context

 Since the last inspection in June 2019, there have been significant changes in the school’s leadership. You took up post as headteacher in January 2020. Two teachers, including an early years leader, have joined the school. The interim academy board has been replaced by a local governing body, including a new chair of governors, in February 2021.

p.2

Context

 Across the autumn term 2020, no pupils had to be educated remotely.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, approximately 45% of pupils were being educated at home. Around 95% of all vulnerable pupils and all pupils with education, health and care plans were attending on site.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, one member of staff was working from home due to COVID-19 restrictions.

p.2

Main findings

 You have worked with determination to bring about the necessary improvements to the quality of education. You have rightly focused on developing teachers’ expertise and redesigning the school’s curriculum. You and your team have ensured that effective on-site or remote education is available to all pupils.

p.2

Main findings

 In January 2020, you set about improving reading as a priority. In the early years and Year 1, a focus on also developing pupils’ speaking and listening skills is paying off. Daily phonics lessons are helping pupils to remember the sounds that letters make. Staff are well trained. They provide extra phonics sessions to help pupils to become more confident readers. By December 2020, many pupils were more secure in using their phonic knowledge to read new words.

p.2

Main findings

 Subject leaders overhauled the school’s curriculum in the summer term 2020. They have started to put in place well-sequenced plans to help teachers know what to teach and when to teach it. This is making a difference, particularly in English, geography and history. Nevertheless, you recognise that some new subject leaders are in the early stages of finding out how well pupils are learning. They need more support to carry out their roles effectively.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have made some effective adjustments to the curriculum. Staff are providing a range of carefully planned one-to-one and small-group support to pupils who need it, whether they are in school or learning remotely. For example, in mathematics, extra sessions are helping pupils to become more confident in the recall of important facts and methods to solve problems. Pupils say that this is helping them to become better mathematicians.

p.2

Main findings

 You have refined remote education in light of your evaluation from the first lockdown. Focused staff training has helped teachers to plan sequences of lessons that build on pupils’ previous learning. You have ensured that any pupils who are not in school have an electronic device to access remote learning. You keep a close check on how well all pupils are taking part in lessons. For example, teachers have set up daily ‘live keep up’ sessions to support pupils who need extra help.

p.3

Main findings

 You have high expectations for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). You have carried out extensive training to increase staff expertise. Your work as the special educational needs coordinator is helping teachers to provide pupils with better support. Adults prioritise supporting younger pupils to develop their early speech and language skills, for example showing children how to form sentences. As a result, many pupils with SEND are becoming more confident writers.

p.3

Main findings

 Governance is in a period of transition. Trust leaders and the former chair of the interim academy board are working closely with the new local governing body. This work is helping the governing body to understand the school’s priorities. Governors have made a positive start in checking the impact of leaders’ actions. For example, they have monitored how effectively leaders are using extra funding to support disadvantaged pupils’ needs.

p.3

Main findings

 You and your governors receive regular support and challenge from the trust. They have been instrumental in supporting you to put in place an effective remote education package. Trust leaders keep a close check on how well all pupils are receiving an education in the current circumstances. They continue to use other support, such as work with the local mathematics hub, to strengthen staff’s expertise.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, the assistant headteacher, the education standards manager and director of education from the trust. We also held meetings with staff and governors to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We also looked at samples of pupils’ work, reviewed documentation and talked to pupils. An inspector listened to pupils read. We looked at 16 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 11 free-text responses, and 16 staff questionnaires. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body and the chief executive officer of Plymouth CAST multi-academy trust, the director of education for the diocese of Plymouth, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Dorset. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion