Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tracey Reynolds (lead), Sarah McGinnis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sarah McGinnis, Tracey Reynolds

  • Postcode verified

    BS13 0RL

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−34Criticalmore positive than 10% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseengaginghigh-qualitysuccessfullyeffectiveclearlyconsistent
Criticismnot alwaysweaknessesseriousnot securelimitednot yetnot confident

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings938w−34
  • What needs to improve130w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,052
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Rupert Maule Headteacher Bridge Learning Campus William Jessop Way Hartcliffe Bristol BS13 0RL

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Bridge Learning Campus

Following my remote inspection with Tracey Reynolds, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 10 and 11 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Bridge Learning Campus

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted's published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to have serious weaknesses.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Bridge Learning Campus

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Bridge Learning Campus

The inspection took place because the school was judged to have serious weaknesses at its previous section 5 inspection. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in May 2018.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Bridge Learning Campus

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Context

 There have been relatively few staffing changes since the previous inspection. There is now a single chair of the local governing body. A new assistant headteacher oversees the teaching of reading and a new subject leader has taken responsibility for English in the primary phase.

p.2

Context

 In the autumn term 2020, a small number of pupils had to work from home at some time. Leaders closed ‘bubbles’ in Reception, Year 6 and part of Year 8, for a short period.

p.2

Context

 This term, approximately 10% of pupils are attending school. This includes the majority of pupils who are considered to be vulnerable and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.2

Main findings

 Trust leaders, governors and school leaders have made a concerted effort to provide education for pupils in the current circumstances. Staff say that they feel valued and that you have clearly explained the reasons for any decisions taken. Pupils and parents agree that staff have provided high-quality care throughout the pandemic.

p.2

Main findings

 Prior to March 2020, leaders had thought carefully about the curriculum and how it is taught. This provided the foundation for school improvement. The drive for improvement has continued, despite interruptions caused by the pandemic, to tackle weaknesses found at the last full inspection.

p.2

Main findings

 Pupils follow the usual curriculum, whether at home or in school. Leaders have reflected on the quality of the remote learning the school provides. As a result, they made some appropriate adjustments to keep this engaging for pupils, and participation in learning at home has risen.

p.2

Main findings

 You have ensured that there is now a consistent approach to the teaching of phonics. Leaders have identified that, although pupils can recognise letters and the sounds that they make, they are not always confident and fluent readers. To address this, leaders are developing a coherent approach to the teaching of reading that spans the full age range of the school. They have successfully prompted pupils to read a wider range of texts.

p.2

Main findings

 While plans for the teaching of mathematics are well advanced, curriculum leaders in other subjects have not yet fully considered the essential content that pupils need to know, and the order in which this is best learned. This means pupils find it difficult to remember what they have learned before, and are not always prepared well for what will come next. Although teachers identify where pupils’ knowledge is not secure, leaders do not reflect sufficiently on why misconceptions may arise in the first place.  Leaders understand the needs of pupils in their local community and work hard to meet these. You have actively encouraged vulnerable pupils to attend school, so that they can receive the support they need. A large proportion of the children of key workers also attend on site. Staff are vigilant about pupil welfare. Their regular contact with pupils serves to check pupils’ well-being and helps them to access the remote learning provided.

p.2

Main findings

 Staff provide effective support for Year 11 pupils to complete their qualifications. Pupils who need direct classroom teaching to do so have been invited into school to complete the necessary work. This has resulted in a significant improvement in the proportion of pupils who are engaging in their learning at home.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders advise teachers on how to match support to the needs of pupils with SEND, although this guidance is not always specific enough to help pupils in all subjects. Pupils continue to work well with external staff, such as speech and language therapists, who provide the specialist support they need.

p.3

Main findings

 Trust leaders and governors are mindful of staff well-being. They have taken the right actions to ensure school leaders can focus specifically on pupils and learning. Trust leaders and governors meet regularly together and with school leaders to discuss the challenges of the current circumstances and to plan for the return of all pupils.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders are curious about exploring the ways that pupils learn best, drawing on research to inform their decisions. They work closely with other school leaders in the trust and have carefully selected external advice to give them an outside perspective of how they can improve further.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, other senior leaders, the chair of the board of trustees, the multi-academy trust chief executive officer and local governors. In addition, we spoke to an external curriculum consultant who works with the school. We also took into account the views of pupils and staff.

p.3

Evidence

We also reviewed school policies and other documentation. We looked at pupils’ work and sampled some teaching sessions which had been recorded. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including two free-text responses.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Trust in Learning (TiLA) multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Bristol. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion