Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Mar 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Adam Sproston (lead), Ian Hardman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Adam Sproston, Ian Hardman

  • Postcode verified

    M5 3JP

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+65Positivemore positive than 63% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivesuccessfullyambitiousstrongclearenjoyconfidentclearly
Criticismconcernslimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1061w+65
  • What needs to improve159w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,206
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Rosemary Hince Headteacher St Joseph’s RC Primary School St Joseph’s Drive Salford Greater Manchester M5 3JP

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of St Joseph’s RC primary school

Following my remote inspection with Adam Sproston, Her Majesty's Inspector (HMI), of your school on 3 and 4 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of St Joseph’s RC primary school

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted's published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of St Joseph’s RC primary school

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of St Joseph’s RC primary school

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in May 2018.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of St Joseph’s RC primary school

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Context

 Following the previous inspection, you were appointed as headteacher. Three teachers have left the school and three have joined. Several other non- teaching staff have either left or joined the school during this period. In addition, four governors have left the school and three new governors have taken up their posts.

p.2

Context

 In the autumn term of 2020, all pupils were educated remotely for a short period of time. Pupils in Year 3 and Year 4 spent more time at home than pupils in other classes.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, approximately four out of ten pupils were being educated on site. This includes one third of vulnerable pupils and almost one half of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, leaders were not dealing with any significant staffing issues.

p.2

Main findings

 Since you joined the school, you have successfully led improvements to the curriculum and the effectiveness of subject leadership. By March 2020, clear and ambitious curriculum plans were in place for most subjects. These plans set out clearly what pupils need to learn and by when. They also consider the order in which pupils should learn new knowledge to help them remember more. In these subjects, for example in history, pupils recount with ease what they know and remember about earlier topics.

p.2

Main findings

 The pandemic has slowed improvements in curriculum planning in a small number of subjects, such as design and technology. Although effective plans have been written in these subjects, leaders have not had the opportunity to implement these plans as well as they have in other subjects.

p.2

Main findings

 Due to the current circumstances, leaders have adapted how teachers deliver the curriculum. Subject leaders, for instance in computing, have changed the order in which some topics are taught. For example, topics that require more specialist teaching, such as coding, will be taught by teachers when all pupils return to school. Leaders have high ambitions for those pupils working at home, as well as those who attend school. All pupils continue to learn the full range of subjects.

p.2

Main findings

 Pupils who are educated on site enjoy learning with their usual teacher every morning and with support staff in the afternoons. This provides consistency for pupils and allows them to follow the usual curriculum. During the afternoon, teachers focus on supporting those pupils who are learning at home. Teachers record short video clips to introduce learning and pupils record their work either on screen or on paper. Teachers also monitor pupils’ work in the afternoon and provide feedback, which helps to keep pupils focused. By working this way, pupils at home access learning successfully and are able to keep up with the curriculum.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders maintain a clear focus on the support given to vulnerable pupils and those with SEND. Staff are in regular contact with these pupils and their families. Leaders are alert to any concerns and make sure that support is provided quickly. Where help is required from other professionals, this is arranged swiftly so that pupils remain on track with their learning. Support to improve some pupils’ behaviour and speech and language has been particularly effective during the pandemic.

p.3

Main findings

 Before the pandemic, reading was a key priority. This remains the case. Pupils at home, as well as those in school, continue to receive effective daily phonics teaching and are expected to read daily. Video clips recorded for pupils at home, including children in the early years, are helpful for parents and carers, as well as pupils. This is because parents can understand how to support learning in phonics at home.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors have invested in appropriate resources to engage pupils in reading. This has allowed pupils at home to access e-books online which are the same as the books in school and are much loved by pupils. Books are well matched to the sounds that pupils are learning. This enables them to read fluently and to understand the text. The pupils who read to us were confident and used their phonic knowledge and skills well to read unfamiliar words.

p.3

Main findings

 The governing board has been strengthened since the last inspection. The new skills and experience offered by newly appointed governors complement those of existing governors. They provide strong support and challenge to ensure that the curriculum continues to be delivered and that remote education is effective.

p.3

Main findings

 The local authority has provided appropriate support and challenge, for example to strengthen governance and subject leadership. Links to mathematics and literacy ‘hubs’ have provided important training for staff. This has secured improvement, for example, in achieving a consistent approach to the teaching of phonics across the school, including in key stage 2.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We held meetings with the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, other senior leaders and middle leaders. We also spoke with a representative of both the local authority and the Diocese of Salford, three members of the governing board, groups of pupils and groups of staff. Meetings explored leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown. We considered eight responses from parents to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire, and 14 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire. One of us also listened to pupils reading to a familiar adult.

p.3

Evidence

We looked at a selection of evidence provided by leaders to show how they have developed the curriculum since the last monitoring inspection and how they are currently providing education. This included curriculum plans, examples of teaching materials and a sample of pupils’ work. We also looked at minutes from governing board meetings and information regarding the leadership of SEND.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Salford, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Salford. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion