Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care monitoring visit

Children's Home run by GS Social Care Solutions Limited in Lancashire

Inspected 3 Feb 2021 · published 20 Mar 2021 · URN 1271222

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Cheryl Field

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    GS Social Care Solutions Ltd

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Feb 2021

  • Inspectors verified

    Cheryl Field

  • Name on report verified

    1271222

  • URN verified

    1271222

Page 5 of 8
Page 5 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−31Criticalmore positive than 47% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseindependentsafeseriouseffectiveeffectivelyaccurate
Criticismharmat riskconcernconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings20w0
  • What needs to improve662w−31

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
682
about usual (typical 566)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 46
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 1%What needs to improve 35%About the inspection 64%

Full report text

Inspection report for children’s home – monitoring visit: 1271222 1

p.1

GS Social Care Solutions Ltd

Monitoring visit Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

This home is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to five young people who may have a learning and/or physical disability. The home is operated by a private organisation. The manager has been registered since August 2020.

p.1

This monitoring visit

The purpose of the on-site visit was to look at the quality of care provided to children, following an anonymous complaint received by Ofsted in relation to poor staff practice towards children and insufficient levels of staff training. There has also been a complaint from a parent in relation to the care of their child, which has been investigated and is still ongoing.

p.1

This monitoring visit

The inspector has looked at all the concerns raised in the anonymous complaint, by speaking with children, staff and social workers. There is no evidence to substantiate the concerns. With respect to the ongoing complaint, the management team has considered lessons learned as a result of the investigation and has implemented a learning outcomes plan to improve areas of practice.

p.1

This monitoring visit

Children have been kept occupied during the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic, with creative indoor and outdoor activities to meet children’s needs. The staff team works consistently within government guidance to ensure the safety of everyone in the home. The management team has ensured the well-being of the staff team during the pandemic. Staff have been given extra supervisions, offered support from the learning disability nurse or counselling service and because of this they feel extremely supported by the manager.

p.1

This monitoring visit

Staff have positive and nurturing relationships with children. Staff say that they genuinely love working with the children. The inspector observed caring and relaxed interactions between the children and staff. Staff understand the individual needs Inspection report for children’s home – monitoring visit: 1271222 2 and risk behaviour for children. Staff are extremely vigilant on shift and ensure that children are always supervised due to their level of need.

p.1

This monitoring visit

Children feel safe and happy living at the home. Children told the inspector that they trust staff. Staff communication skills with children are creative and have helped children to develop individual ways of communicating with staff to share their feelings. Children understand how to make a complaint and who to raise this with. Children are actively involved in planning their days, such as choosing their own menus and daily activities.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Social workers say that children are safe and make significant progress while living at the home. Some examples of the positive progress are children flourishing in education, children helped to manage their risks, increased confidence in communicating with others and improved diets. One social worker said: ‘The staff team are amazing. Everything they do is personalised to the child. They are the child’s biggest advocate. They are like a family.’

p.2

This monitoring visit

Behaviour management plans and risk assessments are robust and give staff clear guidance on effective strategies to use to support children to manage their behaviour. The plans are individualised to the child. They focus on the strengths of the child and triggers to their behaviour, and relate directly to the behaviour management model that staff are trained in.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Staff demonstrate that they understand de-escalation techniques to help children to manage their behaviour. Restraint records are clear and evaluate the effectiveness of the measure used. Key-work sessions are completed with children following the use of restraint. That said, not all records evidence a debrief with staff involved in the restraint. This prevents staff from having the opportunity to discuss the measure used and reflect on lessons learned to improve practice.

p.2

This monitoring visit

There has been one serious incident where a staff member has mismanaged a child’s behaviour and supporting staff did not use the whistle-blowing procedure appropriately. The manager has taken suitable action to investigate the incident, address the shortfalls in staff practice and report it to the appropriate safeguarding professionals. Subsequently, a team meeting has taken place to reinforce the staff team’s understanding of the whistle-blowing policy and a bespoke training course in safeguarding disabled children has been arranged. During discussion with the inspector, staff could evidence their knowledge of the whistle-blowing policy and of how to escalate any safeguarding concerns.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Staff have received all necessary training to meet children’s needs and complexities. However, all s taff have not been provided with whistle-blowing training. The training is a necessity to ensure that staff know how to take immediate action should they have any concerns about a staff member or professional’s practice who works with children living in the home. Inspection report for children’s home – monitoring visit: 1271222 3 Independent visitor reports do not meet regulatory requirements, as they do not always summarise whether the independent visitor feels that children are safeguarded effectively, and their welfare promoted. In addition, the reports do not include regular feedback from children, staff, parents or stakeholders to be able to obtain a full evaluation of the service provided in the home.

p.2

This monitoring visit

The manager has ensured that the core staff team has remained together to ensure continuity of care for the children. Staff and social workers say that the manager has brought stability to the staff team and the high turnover of staff has reduced. Three consistent agency staff are used regularly. Staff told the inspector that these specific agency staff understand the children’s needs, have positive relationships with the children and are part of the team.

p.3

This monitoring visit

The manager has used the time during the pandemic positively to get to know the children and the staff team, including reviewing the operation of the home and areas that needed improving.

p.3

This monitoring visit

Requirements made at Ofsted’s previous inspection were not looked at during this visit and so remain requirements and recommendations for the home’s next visit.

p.3

Recent inspection history

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement 03/03/2020 Interim Sustained effectiveness 12/06/2019 Full Good 19/03/2019 Interim Improved effectiveness 15/05/2018 Full Requires improvement to be good Inspection report for children’s home – monitoring visit: 1271222 4

p.3

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.4

Requirement Due date

The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.

p.4

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—

p.4

Requirement Due date

have the skills to identify and act upon signs that a child is at risk of harm;

p.4

Requirement Due date

understand the roles and responsibilities in relation to protecting children that are assigned to them by the registered person;

p.4

Requirement Due date

take effective action whenever there is a serious concern about a child’s welfare; and

p.4

Requirement Due date

are familiar with, and act in accordance with, the home’s child protection policies.

p.4

Requirement Due date

(Regulation 12 (1) (2)(a)(iii)(v)(vi)(vii))

p.4

Requirement Due date

Specifically, to ensure that all staff have been trained in and understand the whistle-blowing policy and procedure. The manager must ensure that staff know how to take appropriate, safe and immediate action should they have concerns about childcare practice in relation to staff or professionals working in the home. 18 March 2021

p.4

Requirement Due date

The registered person must ensure that all employees—

p.4

Requirement Due date

undertake appropriate continuing professional development; and

p.4

Requirement Due date

receive practice-related supervision by a person with appropriate experience. 9 April 2020 Inspection report for children’s home – monitoring visit: 1271222 5 (Regulation 33 (4)(a))

p.4

Requirement Due date

within 48 hours of the use of a measure of control, discipline or restraint, the registered person, or a person who is authorised by the registered person to do so (“the authorised person”)—

p.5

Requirement Due date

has spoken to the user about the measure; and

p.5

Requirement Due date

has signed the record to confirm it is accurate.

p.5

Requirement Due date

Specifically, that debriefs take place with all staff involved in a restraint or physical intervention. This is to enable staff and the management team to discuss the measure used and any lessons learned from the incident to improve practice. 18 March 2021

p.5

Requirement Due date

When the independent person is carrying out a visit, the registered person must help the independent person—

p.5

Requirement Due date

if they consent, to interview in private such of the children, their parents, relatives and persons working at the home as the independent person requires.

p.5

Requirement Due date

The independent person must produce a report about a visit (“the independent person’s report”) which sets out, in particular, the independent person’s opinion as to whether—

p.5

Requirement Due date

children are effectively safeguarded; and

p.5

Requirement Due date

the conduct of the home promotes children’s well-being.

p.5

Requirement Due date

(Regulation 44 (2)(a) (4)(a)(b)) 18 March 2021

p.5

Requirement Due date

The registered person must complete a review of the quality of care provided for children (“a quality of care review”) at least once every 6 months.

p.5

Requirement Due date

In order to complete a quality of care review the registered person must establish and maintain a system for monitoring, reviewing and evaluating—

p.5

Requirement Due date

the quality of care provided for children; 9 April 2020 Inspection report for children’s home – monitoring visit: 1271222 6 the feedback and opinions of children about the children’s home, its facilities and the quality of care they receive in it; and any actions that the registered person considers necessary in order to improve or maintain the quality of care provided for children.

p.5

Requirement Due date

After completing a quality of care review, the registered person must produce a written report about the quality of care review and the actions which the registered person intends to take as a result of the quality of care review (“the quality of care review report”).

p.6

Requirement Due date

supply to HMCI a copy of the quality of care review report within 28 days of the date on which the quality of care review is completed; and

p.6

Requirement Due date

make a copy of the quality of care review report available on request to a placing authority, if the placing authority is not the parent of a child accommodated in the home.

p.6

Requirement Due date

The system referred to in paragraph (2) must provide for ascertaining and considering the opinions of children, their parents, placing authorities and staff.

p.6

Requirement Due date

(Regulation 45 (1) (2)(a)(b)(c) (3) (5))

p.6

Information about this inspection

The purpose of this visit was to monitor the action taken and the progress made by the children’s home since its last Ofsted inspection.

p.6

Information about this inspection

This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000. Inspection report for children’s home – monitoring visit: 1271222 7

p.6

Children’s home details

Registered provider: GS Social Care Solutions Ltd

p.7

Inspector

Cheryl Field, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home – monitoring visit: 1271222 8 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion