Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 19 Mar 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Fiona Webb (lead), Fyfe Johnston

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Fiona Webb, Fyfe Johnston

  • Postcode verified

    PE30 2HU

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−36Criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisestrengthenjoyment
Criticismseriousweaknesseslimitedgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings826w−36
  • What needs to improve264w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,074
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 74%What needs to improve 24%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Amanda Fewkes Headteacher The Fen Rivers Academy Kilhams Way King’s Lynn Norfolk PE30 2HU

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Fen Rivers Academy

Following my remote inspection with Fiona Webb, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 3 and 4 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Fen Rivers Academy

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to have serious weaknesses.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Fen Rivers Academy

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Fen Rivers Academy

The inspection took place because the school was judged to require serious weaknesses at its previous section 5 inspection. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in June 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of The Fen Rivers Academy

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 accelerate plans to reintegrate those pupils who have been learning from home for some time while their placements are reassessed

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 make sure that there is a well-considered curriculum for early years through to key stage 4 that all staff understand and can deliver.

p.2

Context

 Since the previous inspection, many staff have changed. Some of these staff were on temporary contracts. You joined the school early in 2020. Several governors have left and the multi-academy trust are seeking to replace these.

p.2

Context

 Currently, pupils at the school are from Year 2 to Year 7. From September 2021, the school will expand. When all building work is complete, it will be able to admit pupils from the early years foundation stage to Year 11.

p.2

Context

 During the autumn term 2020, more than half of all pupils were educated remotely. This included pupils from all year groups who, at different times, needed to isolate.

p.2

Context

 In January 2021, the school closed for 10 days for safety reasons after advice from Public Health England. During this time, pupils were learning from home.

p.2

Context

 At the time of the inspection, around two thirds of pupils were being educated at home. All pupils in this special school have an education, health and care plan. A small number of pupils have been receiving off-site tuition not related to COVID-19. This is because their placements at the school are being reassessed.

p.2

Main findings

 You have offered places for all pupils to attend school during the current national lockdown. Some families have chosen to keep their children at home. You and your leadership team are encouraging pupils to return to on-site learning, wherever possible. Pupils working from home have remote lessons or, alternatively, have paper-based ‘home-working packs’. Pupils currently on site told inspectors that they feel they learn best in school.

p.2

Main findings

 Teachers take account of pupils’ complex needs. Staff work hard to communicate with parents so that they understand how they can support remote education at home. For example, staff contact parents to discuss how they can support practical tasks, such as counting or measuring, using household items. This is helping pupils access their learning.

p.2

Main findings

 Work to develop the school’s curriculum started last year and is ongoing. Leaders have developed subject plans so that pupils can be taught the most important knowledge they need, building on pupils’ prior learning. However, in the current plans, there are gaps in some aspects of the curriculum from early years through to key stage 4.

p.2

Main findings

 The small number of pupils who have been learning at home while their placements are reassessed receive a combination of off-site tutoring and the school’s remote learning offer. There are no agreed plans in place for these pupils to return to school, and for some pupils this has gone on for too long.

p.3

Main findings

 Well-being is a strength of the school. Teachers contact parents daily and there are plans in place if contact is not made. You make sure that parents know how to get in touch with staff and get the help they need.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders have prioritised behaviour management. This has resulted in less time being spent on developing the teaching of reading. Leaders know that they need to ensure that pupils learn how to read well. You have started to check the quality of reading remotely and on site. Pupils use the school’s new library and this is encouraging pupils’ enjoyment of reading.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors are receiving training. They are aware of their role to both support and challenge leaders and are in the early stages of achieving this. They support and value the actions you and your staff are taking to maintain pupils’ learning, both in school and at home.

p.3

Main findings

 The trust provides you with more advice than it did at the time of the previous inspection. Staff value this increased support and training, and it is helping them to better understand their role in supporting pupils’ social, emotional and mental health needs. The local authority has provided guidance and support which has helped you to consider the impact of the early work you have done on curriculum.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We held meetings with you and other senior leaders, two multi-academy trust representatives, a group of pupils, parents and carers, a group of staff, four governors and a representative of the local authority to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during the national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We also looked at pupils’ work and spoke with pupils to discuss the books they were reading. We reviewed academy documentation and looked at the checks and support undertaken for pupils working from home. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including one free-text response, and 25 staff questionnaires.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of Catch22 multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Norfolk. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion