Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
Gary Rawlings (lead), Alison Colenso
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Alison Colenso, Gary Rawlings
- Postcode verified
UB3 1PG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted p.1
- Since the previous inspection, two vice-principals have left the school. p.2
- A new senior vice-principal has been in post since September 2020. p.2
- A vice-principal for curriculum was appointed in April 2019. p.2
- Five members of the governing body, including the chair, have left. p.2
- Directors of the trust currently govern the school. p.2
- During the autumn term, two thirds of pupils had to work from home at some point. p.2
- This included whole-class closures, with two Year 5 classes affected twice. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,103
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Rachel Jacob Principal Pinkwell Primary School Pinkwell Lane Hayes Middlesex UB3 1PG
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Pinkwell Primary School
Following my remote inspection with Gary Rawlings, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 3 and 4 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Pinkwell Primary School
This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Pinkwell Primary School
Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Pinkwell Primary School
The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in March 2019.
p.1
Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Pinkwell Primary School
Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted
p.1
Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Context
Since the previous inspection, two vice-principals have left the school. A new senior vice-principal has been in post since September 2020. A vice-principal for curriculum was appointed in April 2019. Five members of the governing body, including the chair, have left. Directors of the trust currently govern the school.
p.2
Context
During the autumn term, two thirds of pupils had to work from home at some point. This included whole-class closures, with two Year 5 classes affected twice.
p.2
Context
At the time of this inspection, the Year 4 and special resourced provision ‘bubbles’ were isolating. Around one in every eight pupils were on site, with just under half of vulnerable pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) in attendance. This is lower than normal due to the bubbles isolating.
p.2
Context
One tenth of staff are currently absent due to COVID-19. Most of these absences are due to the bubble closures.
p.2
Main findings
Remote education has developed since last year. Online learning platforms were not used as extensively during previous periods of closure but are now utilised to set work for pupils remotely. The same work is set for all pupils, whether they are at school or at home. Teachers and teaching assistants are available throughout the day to support pupils as they complete activities.
p.2
Main findings
The current curriculum was launched in September 2019. Leaders decided to take a project-based approach for teaching subjects such as art, geography and history. Some aspects of this work are not able to be delivered remotely. Leaders explained that trips to local cafes and museums normally provide important experiences for their pupils, and these have been conducted virtually where possible.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders introduced a new mathematics programme in September 2019. It encourages deeper learning in each area of mathematics. Pupils are required to explain calculations in detail, to ensure they have mastered one concept before moving on to the next. Pupils in key stage 1 do this more confidently than those in Years 3 to 6. More work is therefore needed to embed the new curriculum consistently across the school.
p.2
Main findings
A new reading approach was introduced in November 2020. This new approach focuses on vocabulary and whole-class reading sessions. Teachers have found it challenging to teach whole-class reading remotely. Plans are in place to introduce live reading lessons for smaller groups of pupils in the coming weeks. The phonics programme for children in Reception and Year 1 was already well established and successful. Pupils at home and in school are able to access books that match sounds they know. However, leaders have identified that some pupils need one-to-one support with learning sounds when learning remotely from home. Individual phonics lessons started for these pupils during this inspection.
p.2
Main findings
Lessons in school continue for vulnerable pupils and children of key workers. Due to leaders’ efforts, numbers attending have gradually increased. Teachers and teaching assistants provide these pupils with targeted support on site in reading and mathematics. Leaders have provided a large number of laptops to families that need them.
p.3
Main findings
Leaders prepared pupils for the current partial closure by using online learning platforms in school during the autumn term. Staff have supported families effectively, for example showing parents how to use devices and how to support learning activities.
p.3
Main findings
Pupils with SEND receive the same provision, whether they are at home or in school. The special educational needs coordinator ensures that all teachers consider pupils with SEND when planning remote education. Teachers give feedback to these pupils when they complete work online. Support from external professionals has continued as far as possible. For example, the speech and language therapist provides sessions for families to attend in person and online.
p.3
Main findings
The school is governed by the Operations Group. This group meets every six weeks. Board members check the remote education offer through accessing the online provision for themselves. Parents, pupils and staff are surveyed regularly, and the trust responds by raising any concerns with the principal and senior leaders.
p.3
Main findings
The trust also monitors vulnerable pupils and those with SEND. Senior leaders provide weekly reports which enable trust members to challenge pupils’ attendance and involvement with learning. This has had an impact by increasing numbers of those being educated on site and increasing engagement with remote education.
p.3
Main findings
The trust brokers a range of support for leaders, including the use of consultants and subject specialists. The school continues to work with English and mathematics experts to embed new approaches in these subjects.
p.3
Evidence
This inspection was conducted remotely. We held meetings with the principal, senior leaders, and representatives from the multi-academy trust governance board to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown. We also spoke with pupils and heard pupils read. We looked at the school’s online learning platforms with teachers and reviewed pupils’ work. We met with year group leaders, teachers and teaching assistants, reviewed a range of documentation related to the curriculum and remote education and considered comments from both staff and Parent View surveys.
p.3
Evidence
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the chief executive officer of the Elliot Foundation multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hillingdon. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion