Social care · Social care monitoring visit
Children's Home run by Aspris Care North West Limited in Lancashire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Sandcastle Care Ltd
- Inspection date verified
8 Feb 2021
- Inspectors verified
Charlie Bamber
- Name on report verified
2582246
- URN verified
2582246
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Any child who has been restrained should be given the opportunity express their feelings about their experience of the restraint as soon as is practicable, ideally within 24 hours of the restraint incident, taking the age of the child and the circumstances of the restraint into account. p.3
- In some cases, children may need longer to work through their feelings, so a record that the child has talked about their feelings should be made no longer than five days after the incident of restraint (regulation 35(3)(c)). p.3
- Children should be encouraged to add their views and comments to the record of restraint. p.3
- Children should be offered the opportunity to access an advocacy support to help them with this (regulation 7(2)(b)(iii)). p.3
- Staff should continually and actively assess the risks to each child and the arrangements in place to protect them. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 223
- shorter than usual (typical 566)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 46
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home - monitoring visit: 2582246 1
p.1
Sandcastle Care Ltd
Monitoring visit Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This children’s home is owned and operated by a private provider. It provides care and accommodation for up to two children who may have emotional or behavioural difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
There is a registered manager in post who was registered at the same time as the home in March 2020. The manager has the relevant level 5 qualification.
p.1
This monitoring visit
This monitoring visit took place as it was registered in March 2020 and has not yet had its post-registration inspection.
p.1
This monitoring visit
Children at this home are settled and are making progress. They both attend their respective education provisions. They engage and invest in staff who care for them. One child is progressing well in learning to become independent. The other child has made fantastic progress in relation to developing secure and trusting relationships. When asked what she liked best about the home, she replied, ‘Hugs and squeezes and tickles from [staff name]. I love her.’ Managers and staff speak of the children with genuine warmth, pride and affection.
p.1
This monitoring visit
Staff have been motivated and creative in thinking of activities to keep the children occupied during COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdowns. Examples of activities include building models, role play, making bug hotels, undertaking scientific experiments, performing magic tricks, using bath paints and making dens.
p.1
This monitoring visit
There are no concerns in relation to matching. Both children have been in placement since the home was registered (previously it was registered under a different provider). They are well matched and do not have a negative influence on each other. Their large age gap works well, and they relate to each other in sibling-like ways. Inspection report for children’s home - monitoring visit: 2582246 2 Children’s risks are understood and mitigated against. One child is staffed at a two- to-one ratio due to her high-level risks and her minimal understanding of personal safety. Another child has reduced her missing-from-home incidents considerably since the start of her placement. A child’s risk assessment omitted the risk of fire setting. Although this is believed to be low risk, it is still a potential risk which staff need to be aware of.
p.1
This monitoring visit
Restrictive physical intervention is used on some occasions to keep the youngest child safe. She has spoken to staff involved in the hold about how she feels. The child has not routinely had an opportunity to speak to a person who was not involved in the hold. This is raised as a good practice recommendation.
p.2
This monitoring visit
Staff speak to children about issues that are important to them or affect their safety and well-being. One child identified as non-binary for a period. Staff are not specifically trained to support issues of gender identity. However, there is evidence that they listened to the child’s wishes and acted on them accordingly, removing all gender-pronoun references in the child’s records.
p.2
This monitoring visit
The home has been through a difficult period in relation to COVID-19. Several staff and the children tested positive. This meant that many staff had to be off work and isolating. Managers, staff and the wider company did their best to minimise disruption during this time. Children did experience some disruption to their care, but every effort was made to provide as much continuity as possible. In general, children benefit from a stable staff team that provides good continuity of care.
p.2
This monitoring visit
A placing social worker spoken to as part of this inspection gave positive feedback. In particular, she commented on the reduced risks and the child being generally happier since she has been living at the home.
p.2
Recent inspection history
Not previously inspected. Inspection report for children’s home - monitoring visit: 2582246 3
p.2
Recommendations
Any child who has been restrained should be given the opportunity express their feelings about their experience of the restraint as soon as is practicable, ideally within 24 hours of the restraint incident, taking the age of the child and the circumstances of the restraint into account. In some cases, children may need longer to work through their feelings, so a record that the child has talked about their feelings should be made no longer than five days after the incident of restraint (regulation 35(3)(c)). Children should be encouraged to add their views and comments to the record of restraint. Children should be offered the opportunity to access an advocacy support to help them with this (regulation 7(2)(b)(iii)). (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 50 paragraph 9.60) Staff should continually and actively assess the risks to each child and the arrangements in place to protect them. Where there are safeguarding
p.3
Recommendations
concerns for a child, their risk assessment, agreed between the home and their placing authority, must include details of the steps the home will take to manage any assessed risks on a day-to-day basis. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 42, paragraph 9.5)
p.3
Information about this inspection
The purpose of this visit was to monitor the action taken and the progress made by the children’s home since its last Ofsted inspection.
p.3
Information about this inspection
This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000.
p.3
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Sandcastle Care Ltd
p.3
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: 49 Whitegate Drive, Blackpool FY3 9DG
p.3
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Penelope Rafferty
p.3
Inspector
Charlie Bamber, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home - monitoring visit: 2582246 4 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.3
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.4
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.4
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion