Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Vic Wilkinson (lead), Helen Williams

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Helen Williams, Vic Wilkinson

  • Postcode verified

    LE3 3LJ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+4Mixedmore positive than 27% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffective
Criticismlimitednot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings741w+4
  • What needs to improve102w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
832
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

Andrew Kitchen Headteacher Stafford Leys Community Primary School Stafford Leys Leicester Forest East Leicester LE3 3LJ

p.1

Primary School

Following my remote inspection with Vic Wilkinson, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 10 and 11 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Primary School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require special measures.

p.1

Primary School

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Primary School

The inspection took place because the school was judged to require special measures at its previous section 5 inspection. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in April 2018.

p.1

Primary School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Context

 In February 2020, the school joined the Bradgate Education Partnership.

p.2

Context

 During the autumn term 2020, approximately a quarter of pupils needed to learn from home because they were self-isolating. Some isolation periods lasted only a few days as they coincided with school holidays.

p.2

Context

 Currently, approximately a quarter of pupils are learning in school. This includes a quarter of the school’s pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and half of the pupils who have an education, health and care plan.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders and those responsible for governance are determined that pupils receive an education as close to normal as possible. They have made sure that pupils at home can access online learning. When this has not been possible, leaders have invited pupils into school to make sure they do not miss out.

p.2

Main findings

 Before the pandemic, leaders were well on the way with developing their curriculum. Leaders had planned out what they wanted pupils to learn and when. Teachers are using this curriculum and are adjusting it well to make sure it meets the needs of pupils at home and in school. For example, teachers in Year 3 decided to wait until all pupils are back in school before they teach division. This is to make sure all pupils can use the same resources to support their learning.

p.2

Main findings

 Pupils in school and at home learn the same things. Some pupils in school and at home get support before and after lessons to make sure they understand what they are learning. If they need it, pupils in school and at home have one-to-one or small group support to help them to catch up.

p.2

Main findings

 Phonics teaching has continued during the lockdown. There has been no lost learning time. Pupils read online books which match the sounds that they have learned. Pupils who are less secure in their phonics knowledge receive extra support whether they are at home or in school.

p.2

Main findings

 The school’s ethos is that the curriculum should meet the needs of all pupils, including those with SEND. Teachers give these pupils resources and support to help them with their learning. The leader of the provision for pupils with SEND provides advice and support to staff to make sure learning is accessible to all pupils.

p.2

Main findings

 Governors know the challenges that staff are facing. They support leaders’ actions to make sure all pupils can continue their education. They ask leaders challenging questions and seek assurances about the education that pupils are getting. Governors check that the school’s vulnerable pupils are carefully monitored to make sure they can access learning.

p.2

Main findings

 The school joined the trust just before the pandemic. The trust has provided support through the pandemic to make sure the school’s COVID-19 procedures are effective. The trust has checked the school’s remote education offer to make sure it meets requirements.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We spoke to you, the senior leadership team, the trust’s director of schools, pupils, staff and representatives of those responsible for governance to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We also looked at samples of pupils’ work, viewed recorded lessons, listened to pupils read and reviewed the school’s curriculum plans. We looked at responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 89 free-text responses, and 43 questionnaires for staff.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Bradgate Education Partnership multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Leicestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion