Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 16 Mar 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Chris Davies (lead), Rachel Tordoff

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Chris Davies, Rachel Tordoff

  • Postcode verified

    NN17 2JH

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+38Positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveambitiousproudimprovedconfidentsecure
Criticismworryinglimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings997w+38
  • What needs to improve126w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,109
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Robert Sloan Executive principal Lodge Park Academy Shetland Way Corby Northamptonshire NN17 2JH

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Lodge Park Academy

Following my remote inspection Chris Davies, Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), of your school on 3 and 4 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Lodge Park Academy

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require special measures.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Lodge Park Academy

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Lodge Park Academy

The inspection took place because the school was judged to require special measures at its previous section 5 inspection. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in January 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Lodge Park Academy

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Context

 A new chief executive officer joined the trust in July 2020. In September 2020, a new assistant principal was appointed, and three staff joined the school’s extended leadership team. A trust-wide vice-principal has been based at the school since January 2021.

p.2

Context

 In the autumn term 2020, only a small proportion of pupils experienced a period of remote education because of COVID-19. Most of these pupils were in Year 9.

p.2

Context

 Currently, the vast majority of pupils are being educated at home. About one quarter of pupils who are vulnerable and a minority of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are attending school on site.

p.2

Main findings

 You and other senior leaders are determined to improve the school. This approach has continued despite the impact of COVID-19 restrictions. Together you have created a culture of aspiration for pupils and staff. Pupils are proud of their school. They know that staff care about them and want them to do well.

p.2

Main findings

 You have prioritised developing the curriculum since the time of the previous inspection and during the pandemic. You have changed key stage 3 back to a three-year curriculum, so that pupils have time to secure their subject knowledge. You have ensured that pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) get the right support.

p.2

Main findings

 Training has helped curriculum leaders to develop the skills and confidence to lead their subject areas. They have improved their curriculum plans to make sure that pupils can build on what they know already. The new plans include opportunities for pupils to remember information and practise using their new knowledge. Some subjects are not as far ahead as others in developing their curriculums.

p.2

Main findings

 The plans for remote and on-site education are well thought-through and reviewed regularly. You communicate any changes to these arrangements to parents and carers. Leaders are mindful of the extra burdens placed on staff and take care to reduce these. Staff, families and pupils value your ‘family- first’ approach during the current circumstances.

p.2

Main findings

 Staff have taken different approaches to providing remote education. Some use video clips so that pupils can observe practical demonstrations, while others teach live lessons to the whole year group. These approaches are working well to ensure that all pupils learn the full curriculum. Teachers share ideas to improve online teaching. For example, they have developed more effective ways of using technology to give pupils feedback remotely.  You are confident that pupils entered for examinations will finish their courses. Some Year 13 curriculum plans have been modified. Year 11 pupils told us that they are focused on their learning, rather than worrying about their final grades. Leaders provide pupils in Years 11 and 13 with careers guidance to support their next steps.

p.2

Main findings

 Arrangements for education are the same for pupils in school and those at home. Vulnerable pupils and other pupils attending school on site receive extra help from learning support assistants. They take part in some practical activities, such as physical education, and design and technology.

p.3

Main findings

 You expect pupils to read each day as part of their daily timetable. They can choose books from the online digital library. Younger pupils attending on site get extra help if they are struggling to read, including with phonics. Older pupils do not all get the support they need to improve their reading during the current circumstances.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders are ambitious for pupils with SEND. The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) provides teachers with effective strategies to meet these pupils’ needs. Teachers use this information to make sure that these pupils can complete their learning remotely. Leaders have adjusted the curriculum for some of the pupils who are learning at home.

p.3

Main findings

 Trustees, governors and trust leaders work together closely. They use their considerable knowledge to provide you and other senior leaders with the right support and challenge, particularly in relation to the curriculum. The trust has supported senior and curriculum leaders to review the curriculum. Trust leaders have helped you to respond to the challenges of providing remote education, such as by offering pupils online enrichment activities and reading resources. They, like you, remain determined to ensure that the school continues to improve.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We held meetings with the executive principal and principal, and other members of the senior leadership team. We spoke with school and trust curriculum leaders. We had discussions with the SENCo and members of staff responsible for pastoral support and safeguarding. We spoke to a group of staff, a group of pupils and heard two pupils read. We held meetings with those responsible for governance and trust representatives, including the chief executive officer, to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We reviewed examples of remote lessons and looked at information about the curriculum and other documentation provided by school leaders. We considered the responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey, and the responses to the survey for staff. We also reviewed staff and parent responses to school surveys about remote education.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the David Ross Education Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Northamptonshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion