Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Mar 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Julie Sackett (lead), Sue Cox

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Julie Sackett, Sue Cox

  • Postcode verified

    RH5 4QW

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−40Criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseengagingknowledgeablepositiveeffectivesensitivetimely
Criticismconcernsseriousweaknessesnot yetdecliningnot stronglimiteddelayed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings915w−35
  • What needs to improve213w−50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,111
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 75%What needs to improve 17%About the inspection 7%

Full report text

Mr James Baguley The Weald Church of England Primary School Newdigate Road Beare Green Dorking Surrey RH5 4QW

p.1

Primary School

Following my remote inspection with Julie Sackett, Her Majesty's Inspector (HMI), of your school on 3 and 4 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Primary School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted's published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to have serious weaknesses.

p.1

Primary School

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Primary School

The inspection took place because the school was judged to have serious weaknesses at its previous section 5 inspection(s). The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in November 2018.

p.1

Primary School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted Leaders and those responsible for governance should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 prioritise improvements to the teaching of phonics for those pupils who are learning at home

p.2

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

 strengthen the curriculum by making explicit what pupils will learn in each subject and the order in which pupils will learn this.

p.2

Context

 The number of pupils on roll is declining. There are currently no pupils in Reception and one class in key stage 1.

p.2

Context

 The executive headteacher and an assistant headteacher left in July 2020. A new headteacher took up post in September 2020. Currently an assistant headteacher is seconded to the school from another school in the trust.

p.2

Context

 A local governing committee replaced the interim academy board in December 2020. The chair of this board took up post in January 2021. Two new governors recently joined the board.

p.2

Context

 During the autumn, most pupils attended school and no classes were disrupted.

p.2

Context

 Currently, overall, 37% of pupils are learning in school. 65% of vulnerable pupils and 53% of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are learning in school.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection there was no COVID-19 staff absence.

p.2

Main findings

 You have ensured that pupils continue to receive an education during this challenging period. Pupils, including those learning at home, learn a broad range of subjects. However, the school’s curriculum for many subjects is not yet strong enough. In foundation subjects such as history and geography, leaders have not identified the precise knowledge pupils will learn. This is reflected in the school’s curriculum for pupils learning in school as well as those pupils learning at home. Leaders had begun to address this prior to the pandemic. However, you acknowledge that there is still more work to do.

p.2

Main findings

 You have made sure that pupils learning at home follow the same timetable as pupils in school. Teachers have considered carefully the routines and lessons they ask pupils to follow. Daily activities include a balance of online learning, practical and physical activities. This approach reflects the consideration leaders give to pupils’ mental health and well-being.  Leaders and teachers have adapted resources to support home learning. They provide a wide range of interesting and engaging resources for pupils to use. Leaders have adjusted the order of topics in subjects such as physical education and geography. For example, in geography, leaders have delayed teaching field studies until later in the school year.

p.2

Main findings

 Teachers keep a daily check of how pupils at home are getting on. They are alert to any pupils who are not logging on to the school’s learning platform and completing tasks. Leaders keep careful oversight of this. They keep in regular contact with families and follow up any concerns. This helps them to identify when they need to give extra support.

p.3

Main findings

 Teachers are knowledgeable about pupils. They are very aware of those pupils who are most vulnerable and respond quickly to any concerns. A key feature of leaders’ work is the close contact they maintain with families and the good relationships they have forged with them. Leaders and staff are sensitive to families’ individual circumstances. When needed, they draft in support from outside agencies and enlist early help.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders have ensured that younger pupils learning at home have access to a suite of phonics resources. They keep in regular contact with parents to find out how things are going. Leaders ask parents to follow the school’s planned phonics programme. However, leaders have not adapted this programme to meet the needs of all pupils. This is particularly so for pupils at an early stage of reading. Some books for these pupils include sounds and words that pupils have not yet learned. This limits the opportunities for pupils to apply their phonics skills.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders work hard to ensure that pupils with SEND receive the help and support that they need. On the whole, teachers adapt activities well to cater for pupils’ needs. They give these vulnerable pupils timely feedback about their learning to help them progress. Leaders have high ambition for pupils with SEND. They work in close partnership with parents. Parents’ responses to Ofsted’s survey, Parent View, are highly positive of the school’s support for pupils with SEND.

p.3

Main findings

 During the current pandemic, trust leaders have provided effective challenge and support to school leaders. They have implemented a new leadership structure. Roles are now much clearer and reflect the school’s needs, current context and circumstances. The new structure supports the school’s leadership team in their work to provide education during the current emergency. Trust leaders have also sought to improve leaders’ capacity during this challenging period. They have recently seconded an assistant headteacher from another local school from the trust. However, it is too soon to see the impact of this work.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, senior leaders, subject leaders, the trust’s director of education and chief executive officer, and two representatives of the local governing committee.

p.4

Evidence

Inspectors met with two groups of pupils, heard some pupils read to their teachers, sampled the school’s curriculum plans, including learning that is being provided remotely, and considered the minutes from trust meetings. They also took into account the 24 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey and the 54 responses to Ofsted’s survey, Parent View, along with parents’ written comments.

p.4

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Good Shepherd Trust, the director of education for the Diocese of Guildford, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Surrey. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion