Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Mar 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Amanda Stringer (lead), Simon Hunter

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Amanda Stringer, Simon Hunter

  • Postcode verified

    BB10 4BH

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveeffectivelyfalling behindimprovingconsistent
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings961w+41
  • What needs to improve144w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,091
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Ian Jones Headteacher St Mary's Roman Catholic Primary School Holcombe Drive Burnley Lancashire BB10 4BH

p.1

Primary School

Following my remote inspection with Amanda Stringer, Her Majesty's Inspector (HMI), of your school on 27 and 28 January 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Primary School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted's published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Primary School

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Primary School

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in July 2019.

p.1

Primary School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Context

 Since the last inspection, two new governors have been appointed. The number of pupils on the school’s roll has reduced. There is now one class in each year group. The nursery provision at the school closed in September 2020.

p.2

Context

 Across the autumn term 2020, around half of the pupils had to be educated remotely for short periods of time. Key stage 2 pupils were particularly affected due to repeated periods of self-isolation for several year groups.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, approximately one third of pupils are being educated on site. Half of these are the most vulnerable pupils and one third are pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.2

Context

 Currently, leaders are not dealing with any significant staffing issues.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders have focused on improving the curriculum since the last inspection. At the start of the pandemic, subject leaders had revised the curriculum plans to set out what pupils should learn in each year group. Since the pandemic took hold, subject leaders have been reviewing the content of their subjects from early years to Year 6. As a result, teachers are able to check that pupils are knowing more and remembering more in all subjects.

p.2

Main findings

 Subject leaders are currently evaluating the curriculum plans to check that pupils build their knowledge from year to year. Some subjects are further on with this action than others. This is due to the staffing issues in the autumn term and the difficulties that staff have faced in being able to meet and develop the curriculum plans. Both of these factors are a direct result of the pandemic.

p.2

Main findings

 In the current circumstances, leaders are adapting the plans for the subjects that they lead so that the curriculum can be taught remotely. This is ensuring that pupils are taught the most important knowledge in the correct order. Pupils who are working at home continue to learn the same things as those in school.

p.2

Main findings

 There is a coherent approach to providing remote education for pupils. Teachers check which pieces of work pupils complete and which recorded sessions they access. They also provide feedback to pupils. Parents and carers contribute to this process. Many parents upload comments about learning and videos of completed learning activities. This is supporting teachers to find out what pupils know and can do.

p.2

Main findings

 Staff are making sure that younger pupils in school, and those at home, continue with their phonics lessons every day. This is also the case for pupils in key stage 2 who are still at the early stages of reading. As a result of having to deliver phonics remotely, leaders have adapted the way that reading is taught. They have also invested in new reading books. Teachers record demonstration videos to help pupils learn the sounds that letters represent. This ensures that pupils who work in school or at home are not falling behind in their phonic knowledge. Pupils are able to continue their reading practise because they are given books that match their reading ability. As a result, there is a consistent approach to the teaching of reading in the current circumstances.

p.2

Main findings

 Vulnerable pupils who are working at home have extra support to meet their individual needs. For example, you have made sure that they have the equipment that allows them to access learning remotely. Leaders also work with other agencies to support vulnerable pupils and their families. This means that the most vulnerable pupils are being supported with their education and emotional well-being during these testing times.

p.3

Main findings

 The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) continues to work in partnership with other agencies. The SENCo also works closely with staff. Together they have completed risk assessments and adapted personalised plans to support these pupils whether they are working in school or at home. This means that pupils with SEND continue to receive an education regardless of where their learning takes place.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors are checking leaders’ actions in the current circumstances. Leaders and governors work together to ensure that a curriculum is in place for all pupils. Governors have taken steps to assure themselves that the education pupils currently receive in school, and at home, is appropriate.

p.3

Main findings

 The local authority has taken actions to support leaders and staff. Training has been provided for governors, subject leaders and teachers. This has had a positive impact on developing staff’s subject knowledge. It has also helped them to understand how to carry out their roles effectively. Local authority officers regularly review the work of leaders and governors, offering support where necessary.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher and deputy headteacher, other senior leaders, staff, five members of the governing body and two representatives of the local authority.

p.3

Evidence

Inspectors examined the school’s curriculum plans and reviewed documents relating to governance. Inspectors also observed pupils reading and talked to some pupils in key stage 2 about their current experiences in school. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Salford, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Lancashire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion