Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Chris Cook (lead), Gill Wild

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Chris Cook, Gill Wild

  • Postcode verified

    YO12 4HF

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−38Criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongengagingimproving
Criticismseriousweaknessesat riskfalling behindlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings975w−38
  • What needs to improve151w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,113
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Dominique Osborne Executive Headteacher Thomas Hinderwell Primary Academy Seamer Road Scarborough North Yorkshire YO12 4HF

p.1

Academy

Following my remote inspection with Chris Cook, Her Majesty's Inspector (HMI), of your school on 3 and 4 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Academy

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted's published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to have serious weaknesses.

p.1

Academy

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Academy

The inspection took place because the school was judged to have serious weaknesses at its previous section 5 inspection. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in February 2020.

p.1

Academy

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Context

 The head of school was appointed in June 2020. A new English Lead and two teachers have joined the school since the previous inspection. The governing body has reconstituted. A smaller Academy Improvement Board (AIB) is now in place. The previous chair of governors is currently co-chair, alongside another governor.

p.2

Context

 In the autumn term 2020, approximately one quarter of all pupils had to be educated remotely. Two thirds of pupils who had to self-isolate were in Years 5 and 6. This was mainly due to the closure of ‘bubbles’.

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, almost all pupils who are vulnerable and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are attending on site. Approximately one third of all pupils are attending school. The remaining two thirds are learning remotely.

p.2

Main findings

 Since the previous inspection, leaders have concentrated on improving pupils’ knowledge in reading, writing and mathematics. Leaders place a strong emphasis on ensuring that the curriculum is accessible to all pupils. They have adapted the curriculum so that it can be delivered in school and remotely. All pupils have access to education in the current circumstances.

p.2

Main findings

 In September 2020, you implemented new systems and procedures to improve the attendance of pupils. A strategy to improve behaviour included ‘Well-being Wednesdays’. This also provides an opportunity to engage with parents. Singing sessions promote the mental health of pupils and staff.

p.2

Main findings

 During the current national lockdown, you are trying to make sure that pupils who are learning at home are covering the same curriculum content as the pupils who are on site. You have worked closely with the trust to develop the school’s remote learning offer. A home learning package is available either online or in paper packs. Teachers personalise learning activities to promote engagement with the remote learning offer. This is fostered through weekly telephone calls to each family to check on provision and well-being.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders are checking the quality of education provided to pupils. Pupils at home learn through a mixture of live and recorded lessons. Teachers make regular checks on pupils accessing home learning, including how well they are doing in their learning. They provide written comments to pupils about their work and use this information to plan the next steps in learning. Misconceptions are retaught through weekly live lessons.

p.2

Main findings

 If pupils are not accessing learning, or are struggling with remote learning, they are offered a place in school. This is particularly the case for vulnerable pupils. Where pupils do not have access to online learning, devices or paper packs of work are provided. Pastoral staff make regular contact with these pupils to check on their learning and well-being.

p.2

Main findings

 You have placed reading at the heart of the curriculum. The teaching of phonics is a high priority for the school. Teachers in the early years and key stage 1 are continuing to teach daily phonics lessons. Teachers record reading lessons for those pupils learning from home. Pupils at risk of falling behind are offered further reading sessions. These are either in class or accessed remotely and are providing pupils with the additional help in reading that they need to catch up. There is similar provision in key stage 2. This is helping most pupils to catch up.

p.3

Main findings

 The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) has personalised the school’s provision map to support pupils with SEND. Pupils have additional resources targeted to meet their individual needs. During this national lockdown, you have offered all pupils with SEND a full-time place in school. Teachers and teaching assistants are adapting the work set to be suitable for them, and the SENCo is monitoring their engagement. From the evidence we gathered, most pupils with SEND appeared to be engaging with learning and making progress towards their personal targets.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors receive a wealth of information from leaders about the work of the school. Remote meetings enable governors continue to hold leaders to account. AIB members have oversight to an area of school improvement. They question and challenge leaders, with a particular focus on those pupils learning from home. Governors are mindful of staff well-being. They are also providing pastoral support when required.

p.3

Main findings

 The trust has been instrumental in the appointment of key staff. Trust directors make regular visits to the school. They check leaders’ actions and ensure the pace of improvement is being maintained. They support leaders with the development of curriculum plans. Members of the trust also quality assure the learning offer the school provides. This applies to learning offered both in school and at home.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We held meetings with the headteacher, other senior leaders, representatives from the multi-academy trust, pupils, staff and representatives of those responsible for governance to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We also examined leaders’ plans and viewed some samples of learning that is being provided remotely. They talked to some pupils in key stage 1 and key stage 2 about their current experiences in school. I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the David Ross Education multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for North Yorkshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion