Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Mar 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Wilson (lead), Tessa Holledge

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Wilson, Tessa Holledge

  • Postcode verified

    PE13 2JB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+16Mostly positivemore positive than 32% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisewell-plannedclearsecure
Criticismlimitedstruggle

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings805w+16
  • What needs to improve143w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
934
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Mr James Ayton Executive headteacher Ramnoth Junior School Ramnoth Road Wisbech Cambridgeshire PE13 2JB

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Ramnoth Junior School

Following my remote inspection with Paul Wilson, Her Majesty's Inspector (HMI), of your school on 3 and 4 February 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Ramnoth Junior School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted's published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require special measures.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Ramnoth Junior School

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Ramnoth Junior School

The inspection took place because the school was judged to require special measures at its previous section 5 inspection(s). The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in March 2019.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Ramnoth Junior School

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Context

 Since the previous inspection in 2019, there have been substantial changes in staffing. The head of school has been in place since September 2019. You started as executive headteacher in September 2020.

p.2

Context

 Prior to the previous inspection, the multi-academy trust (the trust) dissolved the local governing body. Trustees oversee the school’s work. The trust provided significant additional leadership capacity prior to the appointment of the permanent headteacher.

p.2

Context

 In the autumn term 2020, about one fifth of pupils had to work away from school at some point.

p.2

Context

 At the time of the inspection, about half of pupils are being educated on site. About two thirds of vulnerable pupils and two thirds of pupils with special needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are on site.

p.2

Main findings

 Senior leaders have ensured that every pupil can learn at home online or have a place in school. Leaders have set clear expectations about the amount of teaching all pupils will receive, and the work they will complete. Teachers give pupils feedback daily.

p.2

Main findings

 Pupils are learning very similar things, whether they are at home or at school. Teachers and support staff use a variety of recorded videos to help teach pupils new content. Teachers adapt activities in English and mathematics to fit pupils’ needs.

p.2

Main findings

 You have continued to develop the curriculum since the previous inspection. Leaders have planned out what key knowledge pupils should learn in each subject each year. Teachers are beginning to use curriculum plans to check that pupils learn and remember the most important information. You are delaying some work that pupils were struggling to complete at home. Pupils are completing more grammar and sentence structure work that would usually be covered later in the year.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders make daily checks to see if pupils working at home are completing their learning. Teachers are quick to make contact if work is not completed. Some pupils who struggle with home working have been offered places in school.

p.2

Main findings

 Reading has been a key focus for the school for some time. Leaders have continued with the improvements noted during the previous inspection. Books are matched to pupils’ reading ability. Leaders have set up an outside library so families can collect books for pupils working at home. Pupils can also read appropriate electronic books.  Pupils who are at an early stage of learning to read have additional teaching sessions if they are in school. Those at home complete tasks that help to secure their existing phonics learning and learn new sounds.

p.2

Main findings

 Pupils with SEND complete well-planned activities that meet their individual needs. Those pupils with an education, health and care plan who are not in school regularly are supported by the special needs coordinator and teaching assistants online.

p.3

Main findings

 The ‘Team Around the Academy’ group provides challenge and support to school leaders. Trust leaders know the school well. They have directly monitored the quality of the school’s home learning offer. School leaders report regularly to trust leaders on pupil engagement and access to remote provision, with a focus on those with SEND and/or those who are considered vulnerable. Trust leaders regularly survey parents to check on their opinions of the remote provision.

p.3

Main findings

 The school has benefited from being part of the Fenland and East Cambridgeshire Opportunity Area. School staff have had training in the teaching of phonics; middle leaders have taken part in leadership and subject- specific training.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. We held meetings with the executive headteacher, other senior leaders and the multi-academy trust chief executive officer. We also spoke with pupils, staff and representatives of those responsible for governance. Our conversations focused upon leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during a national lockdown.

p.3

Evidence

We scrutinised the online classrooms and the work set and completed remotely. We spoke to pupils being taught on site. We considered the 19 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey and 11 responses to Ofsted’s Parent View questionnaire, as well as eight comments submitted by parents.

p.3

Evidence

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Elliot Foundation Multi-Academy Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Cambridgeshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion