Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Mar 2021

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lucy Bruce (lead), Brian Oppenheim

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Brian Oppenheim, Lucy Bruce

  • Postcode verified

    SE6 2SE

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+45Positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongwell sequencedambitiouscleareffectivelyeffectivepositivethoughtful
Criticismweakerlimitedabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings902w+54
  • What needs to improve159w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,046
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Jane Hadlow Headteacher Conisborough College Conisborough Crescent Catford London SE6 2SE

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Conisborough College

Following my remote inspection with Lucy Bruce, Her Majesty's Inspector (HMI), of your school on 27 to 28 January 2021, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Conisborough College

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 (2) of the Education Act 2005 (as amended) and in accordance with Ofsted's published procedures for visiting schools while routine inspections remain temporarily suspended. It was additional to the usual monitoring process for schools that are judged to require improvement.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Conisborough College

Following changes to government guidance and the imposition of COVID-19 (coronavirus) lockdown restrictions, this monitoring inspection was carried out remotely. As such, the range of evidence available to inspectors was narrower than would normally be the case during an on-site inspection. As a result, this letter provides a more limited level of assurance than our usual monitoring reports.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Conisborough College

The inspection took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement. The school’s most recent section 5 inspection took place in May 2018.

p.1

Additional, remote monitoring inspection of Conisborough College

Having considered all the evidence and taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on the school, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

to provide education in the current circumstances. Ofsted

p.1

Leaders and those responsible for governance are taking effective action

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Context

 Since your appointment in September 2018, there have been changes to the leadership team. This includes internal promotions and an external appointment. Five new subject leaders have been appointed, including the special educational needs coordinator. There are four new governors.

p.2

Context

 In the autumn term 2020, all pupils experienced remote education because of COVID-19. This affected approximately a quarter of the pupils at any one time. Year 11 pupils had two periods of remote education.

p.2

Context

 Nearly all pupils are learning remotely. Most of the pupils who are attending school are vulnerable or those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.2

Context

 At the time of this inspection, a small proportion of staff were absent due to COVID-19. The school was affected by high levels of staff absence before Christmas. Staff absence is managed through the arrangements for remote education.

p.2

Main findings

 You and your staff are taking strong action to ensure that pupils continue to receive a broad education in the current circumstances. You have focused on adapting the curriculum and supporting staff to teach remotely and ensure pupils’ well-being.

p.2

Main findings

 Leadership is dynamic and thoughtful. Before the start of the pandemic, you had already made significant improvements. Higher expectations for behaviour have been consolidated. Staff and pupils said that behaviour is much better. The number of pupils excluded from school has reduced significantly.

p.2

Main findings

 Your decision to develop the potential of existing staff through well-aimed training is making a significant difference. Staff new to the school bring fresh ideas. The cumulative effect of this work is clear. You, your leadership team and subject leaders are driving improvements, especially to the curriculum and pupils’ learning.

p.2

Main findings

 The work to improve how well subjects are taught is bearing fruit. Subject leaders are reviewing the content of their subjects to check that it is well sequenced. Leaders support subject leaders to adapt their teaching plans for remote education. The content of subjects has been reordered with the aim of helping pupils to learn at home. For example, in English, pupils study non- fiction instead of novels. Teachers understand that pupils need to revisit key knowledge so that they can remember it. This is evident in remote lessons, which start with a recap of previous work.  Leaders routinely check pupils’ work. Leaders and teachers are refining these checks so that the information they get can be used quickly to adapt their plans. Making sure that assessment is used effectively to check whether pupils know more and remember more is a priority.

p.2

Main findings

 Leaders take effective action to ensure that all pupils can continue to access a broad and relevant curriculum during the current restrictions. The bespoke programme of support for pupils with SEND is based on their individual needs. This mirrors the in-school programme. Leaders work in close partnership with external agencies to meet the needs of these pupils. For example, the speech and language service continues to support pupils.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders encourage vulnerable pupils to attend school in person. Where vulnerable pupils work from home, there is regular contact. Heads of year support subject teachers to make sure that all pupils attend lessons, including remotely. This is supported by remote assemblies, which follow the normal timetable. These celebrate pupils’ successes and allow them regular contact with teachers and their peers. Weaker readers are a priority. Teaching assistants continue to provide literacy support both in school and remotely.

p.3

Main findings

 Leaders are ambitious for Year 11. Pupils follow a clear timetable so that they can access all their subjects. They receive helpful feedback from their teachers whether they are at home or in school. Pupils know that their teachers are there to support them. Attendance in Year 11 remote lessons is strong.

p.3

Main findings

 Governors understand the school’s priorities and know what needs to be done. They receive helpful information about the school’s performance, and staff and pupil well-being. They support you and your staff, and hold you to account, in equal measure. Governors bring considerable expertise and are starting to adopt a more strategic role. Their focus is on getting the best out of the current situation but with an eye to the future.

p.3

Main findings

 The local authority provides targeted support. This has a positive impact, especially on the ability of leaders to drive improvement. Subject leaders are part of a local authority project to develop and share ideas on remote education with other schools.

p.3

Evidence

This inspection was conducted remotely. Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, senior leaders, staff and pupils to discuss leaders’ actions to provide education to all pupils during the current circumstances. They also spoke to members of the governing body and representatives of the local authority. Inspectors visited some remote lessons and looked at pupils’ work in English. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for the London Borough of Lewisham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion